Ernst Bloch stood in intellectual opposition to Max Weber, yet they have a similar framework through which they both analyzed religion. Both Weber and Bloch engaged in a class analysis of the Bible. In Ancient Judaism, Weber provides the historical, political, and socio-economic context in which we can understand the origins of the belief in the Messiah. Bloch's dialectical theory of secularization of Judeo-Christian Messianism into Marxism has a parallel structure to Weber's theory of religious rationalization in Ancient Judaism. For Weber, ancient Judaism experienced a process of religious rationalization that is marked by a dialectic between the charisma of the prophet and the tradition of the priest, between value and substantive rationality, between disaster and salvation. Bloch's dialectical theory of secularization, which takes place from Moses through the prophets to Jesus and from Feuerbach to Marx, views the process of secularization as being driven by a contradiction between faith in God and faith in man. Bloch, who embraced Jewish Messianic beliefs, had hope in the resolution of this dialectical conflict while Weber, who was far more pessimistic, did not. Combining elements from Weber's theory of religious rationalization and Bloch's theory of secularization, provides the basis for a dialectical theory of secularization in which the tensions between the sacred and profane, while driving the process of secularization forward, remain unresolved.
Abraham, Gary1992Max Weber and the Jewish Question. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
2.
Beckford, James A.1985 “Religious Organizations.” In: PhilipHammond (ed.), The Sacred in a Secular Age. Pp. 125-138. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3.
Bendix, Reinhard1977Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
4.
Berger, Peter L.1963 “Charisma and Religious Innovation: The Social Location of Israelite Prophecy.” American Sociological Review28: 940-950.
1964Geist der Utopie. Zweite Fassung, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
7.
1968Atheismus im Christentum. Frankfurt am Main : Suhrkamp Verlag.
8.
1970Man on his Own: Essays in the Philosophy of Religion. Translated by E.B. Ashton. New York: Herder and Herder.
9.
1971Geist der Utopie, Erste Fassung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
10.
1972Atheism in Christianity: the religion of the Exodus and the Kingdom. Translated by J.T. Swann, New York: Herder and Herder.
11.
1995The Principle of Hope. 3 Vols. Translated by Neville Plaice. Stephen Plaice and Paul Knight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Cohen, Jere, Lawrence E. Hazelrigg AND Whitney Pope1975 “De-Parsonzing Weber: A Critique of Parsons' Interpretation of Weber's Sociology.” American Sociological Review40: 229-241.
13.
Collins, Randall1985Four Sociological Traditions. New York : Oxford University Press.
14.
Connell, R.W.1997 “Why is Classical Theory Classical?” American Journal of Sociology102: 1511-57.
15.
Duncan, J. AND M. Derrett1985 “Recht und Religion im Neuen Testament (bis zum Jahr 135)”, pp. 317-362. In: Wolfgang Schluchter (ed.), Max Webers Sicht des antiken Christentum . Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag .
16.
Durkheim, Emile1995The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by Karen E. Fields. New York: The Free Press .
17.
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N.1981 “Max Webers antikes Judentum und der Charakter der jüdischen Zivilisation”, pp. 134-184. In: Wolfgang Schluchter (ed.), Max Webers Studie über das Antike Judentum. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
18.
Fahey, Tony1982 “Max Weber's Ancient Judaism.” American Journal of Sociology88: 62-87.
19.
Fleischmann, Eugène1981 “Max Weber, die Juden und das Ressentiment .” Max Weber's Studie über das Antike Judentum, pp. 263-286. In: Wolfgang Schluchter (ed.), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
20.
Frend, William H.C.1985 “Die Bedeutung von Max Webers Ansatz für die Untersuchung der frühen Christlichen Sektenbewegung”, pp. 466-485. In: Wolfgang Schluchter (ed.), Max Webers Sicht des antiken Christentum. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
21.
Gager, John G.1985 “Paulus und das antike Judentum: Eine Kritik an Max Webers Interpretation,” pp. 386-403. In: Wolfgang Schluchter (ed.), Max Webers Sicht des antiken Christentum. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
22.
Guttmann, Julius1925 “Max Webers Soziologie des antiken Judentums .” Monatschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judentums69: 195-223.
23.
Habermas, Jürgen1984Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
Jäger, Alfred1969Reich ohne Gott: Zur Eschatologie Ernst Blochs. Zürich: EVZ Verlag.
25.
Kalberg, Stephen1980 “Max Weber's Types of Rationality: Cornerstones for the Analysis of Rationalization Processes of History.” American Journal of Sociology85: 1145-1179.
26.
2001 “The Spirit of Capitalism Revisited: Stephen Kalberg on His Translation of Weber's Protestant Ethic.” Perspectives: The ASA Theory Section Newsletter23: 1-4.
27.
Löwy, Michael1980 “Jewish Messianism and Libertarian Utopia in Central Europe (1900-1933).” New German Critique20: 105-115.
28.
Meeks, Wayne1985 “ Die Rolle des paulinischen Christentums bei der Entstehung einer rationalen ethischen Religion,” pp. 363-385. In: Wolfgang Schluchter (ed.), Max Webers Sicht des antiken Christentums. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Velag.
29.
Mommsen, Wolfgang J.1974The Age of Bureaucracy: Perspectives on the Political Sociology of Max Weber. New York: Harper & Row.
30.
Münster, Arno (ED.) 1978Tagträume vom aufrechten Gang. Sechs Interviews mit Ernst Bloch. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
31.
1982Utopie, Messianismus und Apokalypse im Frühwerk von Ernst Bloch . Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag .
32.
Parsons, Talcott1937The Structure of Social Action. New York: The Free Press.
33.
Raphaël, Freddy1981 “Die Juden als Gastvolk im Werk Max Webers”, pp. 224-262. In: Max Weber's Studie über das Antike Judentum . edited by Wolfgang Schluchter, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
34.
Ratschow, Carl Heinz1971Atheismus im Christentum? Eine Auseinanderzetzung mit Ernst Bloch. Güterloh: Güterloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn.
35.
Schiper, I.1959 “Max Weber on the Sociological Basis of the Jewish Religion.” Jewish Journal of Sociology1: 250-260.
36.
Schluchter, Wolfgang1981a “Altisraelistische religiöse Ethik und okzidentaler Rationalismus,” pp. 11-77. In: Wolfgang Schluchter (ed.), Max Webers Studie über das Antike Judentum. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
37.
1981 b The Rise of Western Rationalism: Max Weber's Developmental History. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
38.
1985 “Einleitung: Max Webers Analyse des antiken Christentum Grundzüge eines unvollendeten Projekts,” pp. 11-71. In: Wolfgang Schluchter (ed.), Max Webers Sicht des antiken Christentums. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Velag.
39.
1989Rationalism, Religion, and Domination: A Weberian Perspective. Translated by Neil Solomon. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40.
Shmueli, Efraim1968 “ The Pariah People and its Charismatic Leadership: A reevaluation of Max Weber's Ancient Judaism” in Proceedings -American Academy for Jewish Research36: 167-247.
41.
Taubes, Jacob1966 “ Die Entstehung des jüdischen Pariavolkes: Ideologiekritische Noten zu Max Webers `Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionsoziologie,' Bd. III, `Das antike Judentum'.” In: Max Weber: Gedächtnisschrift der Ludwig-Maximilian-Universität München zur 100. Wiederkehr seines Geburtstages 1964. hrsg. v. Karl Engisch, Bernhard Pfister and Johannes Winckelmann. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
42.
Tenbruck, Friedrich H.1980 “The Problem of thematic unity in the works of Max Weber.” British Journal of Sociology31: 316-351.
43.
Tschannen, Oliver1991 “The Secularization Paradigm: A Systematization .” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion30: 395-415.
44.
Warner, R. Stephen1993 “Work in Progress toward a new Paradigm for the Sociological Study of Religion in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology98: 1044-93.
45.
Wax, Murray1960 “Ancient Judaism and the Protestant Ethic .” American Journal of Sociology65: 449-455.
46.
Weber, Marianne1989Max Weber: Ein Lebensbild. München: R. Piper GmbH & Co.
