Benefits of Collegiate Recreational Sports Participation: Results from the 2013 NASPA Assessment and Knowledge Consortium Study

Abstract

This study reports the results from the 2013 National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (NASPA) Assessment and Knowledge Consortium. Students (N = 33,522) from 38 different colleges and universities across the United States completed the Recreation and Wellness Benchmark instrument. Using Astin's Theory of Student Involvement (1984), this study sought to determine if there were significant differences between different depth and breadth levels of participants' campus recreational sports involvement/participation on student retention, health and wellness, and student learning outcomes. Heavy Users placed significantly more importance on campus recreational sports facilities and programs when deciding to continue at their college/university, and felt they had increased or improved every health and wellness and student learning outcome from their participation in campus recreation significantly more when compared with Moderate, Light, and Non-Users. Findings from this nationwide study demonstrate the value of collegiate recreation to the college and university experience.

Keywords

campus recreation health and wellness outcomes quality of life retention student learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American College Health Association. (2014). American College Health Association– National College Health Assessment II: Reference Group Executive Summary Spring 2014. Hanover, MD: American College Health Association.

Artinger

, Clapham

, Hunt

, Meigs

, Milord

, Sampson

, & Forrester

(2006). The social benefits of intramural sports. NASPA Journal, 43, 69–86. doi[:]10.2202/0027-6014.1572

Astin

A.W.

(1984). Student involvement: A development theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297–308.

Astin

A.W.

(1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Barcelona

(2002). Student involvement in campus recreational sports activities and gains in team-functioning. LARnet; The Cyber Journal of Applied Leisure and Recreation Research, 1–13.

Belch

H.A.

, Gebel

, & Mass

G.M.

(2001). Relationship between student recreation complex use, academic performance, and persistence of first-time freshmen. NASPA Journal, 38, 254–268. doi[:]10.2202/0027-6014.1138

Blankenship

(2010). Applied research and evaluation methods in recreation. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Bryant

J. A.

, & Bradley

J. L.

(1993). Enhancing academic productivity, student development and employment potential. National-Intramural-Recreational Sports Association Journal, 42–44.

Bryant

, Bradley

, & Milborne

(1994). Comparing student participation in campus recreation to other aspects of campus life. NIRSA Annual Conference Review, 45, 144–168.

10.

Bryant

J.A.

, Banta

T.W.

, & Bradley

J.L.

(1995). Assessment provides insight into the impact and effectiveness of campus recreation programs. NASPA Journal, 32, 153–160.

11.

Christie

N.G.

, & Dinham

S.M.

(1991). Institutional and external influences on social integration in the freshman year. The Journal of Higher Education, 62, 412–428. doi[:]10.2307/1982003

12.

Colditz

G.A.

, & Mariani

(2000). The cost of obesity and sedentarism in the United States. In Bouchard

(Ed.), Physical activity and obesity (pp. 55–65). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

13.

Collins

J.R.

, Valerius

, King

, & Graham

(2001). The relationship between college students' self-esteem and the frequency and importance of their participation in recreational activities. National-Intramural-Recreational Sports Association Journal, 25, 38–47.

14.

Corbin

C.B.

, & Lindsey

(2005). Fitness for life. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

15.

Field

(2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

16.

Forrester

(2006). An examination of the factors contributing to student satisfaction with their overall academic experience. Schole: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 21, 21–34.

17.

Geller

(1980). Selected bibliography of the influence of intramural sports on individual development. National-Intramural-Recreational Sports Association Journal, 5, 24–28.

18.

Haines

D.J.

(2001). Undergraduate student benefits from university recreation. National-Intramural-Recreational Sports Association Journal, 25, 25–33.

19.

Hall

D.A.

(2006). Participation in a campus recreation program and its effect on student retention. Recreational Sports Journal, 30, 40–45.

20.

Henderson

K.A.

, & Bialeschki

(2010). Evaluating leisure services: Making enlightened decisions. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.

21.

Huesman

R.L.

Jr. , Brown

A.K.

, Lee

, Kellogg

J.P.

, & Radcliffe

P.M.

(2009). Gym bags and mortarboards: Is use of campus recreation facilities related to student success? NASPA Journal, 46, 50–71.

22.

Kanters

, & Forrester

(1997). The motivations and self-esteem of intramural sports participants. National-Intramural-Recreational Sports Association Journal, 21, 3–7.

23.

Kanters

M.A.

(2000). Recreational sport participation as a moderator of college stress. Recreational Sports Journal, 24, 11–24.

24.

Kimball

, & Freysinger

V.J.

(2003). Leisure, stress and coping: The sport participation of collegiate student-athletes. Leisure Sciences, 25, 115–141. doi[:]10.1080/01490400306569

25.

Light

R.J.

(1990). The Harvard assessment seminars: Explorations with students and faculty about teaching, learning, and student Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Education and Kennedy School of Government.

26.

Lindsey

, Sessoms

, & Willis

(2009). Impact of campus recreational sports facilities and programs on recruitment and retention among African American students: A pilot study. Recreational Sports Journal, 33, 25–34.

27.

Milton

P.R.

(1992). Relating student development theory to women's recreational sports participation. National-Intramural-Recreational Sports Association Journal, 17, 3–7.

28.

National Intramural Recreational Sports Association. (1991). Quality and importance of recreational services: Technical manual and survey. Corvallis, OR: NIRSA National Center.

29.

National Intramural Recreational Sports Association. (2000). Quality and importance of recreational services: Technical manual and survey. Corvallis, OR: NIRSA National Center.

30.

National Intramural Recreational Sports Association. (2004). Value of recreational sports in higher education: Impact on student enrollment, success, and buying power. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

31.

National Intramural Recreational Sports Association. (2010). 2010 NIRSA/NASPA Consortium campus recreation impact study. Retrieved from http://www.nirsa.org/docs/Discover/Research/Campus_Rec_Impact_Study.PDF

32.

Nesbitt

G.M.

(1993). What effect do our programs have on our participants? National-Intramural-Recreational Sports Association Journal, 17, 16–18.

33.

Nesbitt

G. M.

(1998). Social-emotional development and extracurricular involvement of sport club participants. National-Intramural-Recreational Sports Association Journal, 22, 6–9.

34.

Ragheb

, & McKinney

(1993). Campus recreation and perceived academic stress. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 5–10.

35.

Smith

M.K.

, & Thomas

(1989). The relationship of college outcomes to post-graduate success. Assessment of student outcomes in higher education. Knoxville, TN: The University of Tennessee, Center for Assessment Research and Development.

36.

Todaro

(1993). The impact of recreational sports on student development: A theoretical model. National-Intramural-Recreational Sports Association Journal, 17, 23–26.