KalfoglouA. L.GellerG., “Navigating Conflict of Interest in Oocyte Donation: An Analysis of Donors' Experiences,”Women's Health Issues10, no. 5 (2000): 226–239.
3.
KawwassJ. F.MonsourM.CrawfordS.KissinD. M.SessionD. R.KulkarniA. D.JamiesonD. J., “Trends and Outcomes for Donor Oocyte Cycles in the United States, 2000–2010,”JAMA310, no. 22 (2013): 2426–2434.
4.
National Research Council, “Two Principles for Identifying and Assessing Conflicts of Interest,” in Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice (Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2009).
5.
DickensB. M.CookR. J., “Conflict of Interest: Legal and Ethical Aspects,”International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics92, no. 2 (2006): 192–197.
6.
See National Research Council, supra note 4.
7.
BergJ. W., “Risky Business: Evaluating Oocyte Donation,”American Journal of Bioethics1, no. 4 (2001): 18–19.
8.
See KalfoglouGeller, supra note 2.
9.
Id.
10.
DickensonD., Property in the Body: Feminist Perspectives (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007); WaldbyC., “Oocyte Markets: Women's Reproductive Work in Embryonic Stem Cell Research,”New Genetics and Society27, no. 1 (2008): 19–31.
137 Cong. Rec. E4145–02 (1991) (statement of Rep. Wyden).
14.
Id.
15.
KleinJ. U.SauerM. V., “Ethics in Egg Donation: Past, Present, and Future,”Seminars in Reproductive Medicine28, no. 4 (2010): 322–328; DanielsC. R.Heidt-ForsytheE., “Gendered Eugenics and the Problematic of Free Market Reproductive Technologies: Sperm and Egg Donation in the United States,”Signs37, no. 3 (2012): 719–747.
16.
RobertsonJ. A., “The Presumptive Primacy of Procreative Liberty,” in Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994): At 22–42.
17.
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973); Griswold v. Conn., 381 U.S. 479 (1965); Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972); Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
18.
See Robertson, supra note 16.
19.
Id.
20.
RaoR., “Equal Liberty: Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Equality,”George Washington Law Review76, no. 6 (2008): 1457–1489.
21.
National Conference of State Legislatures, “State Laws Related to Insurance Coverage for Infertility Treatment” (updated June 2014), available at <http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/insurance-coverage-for-infertility-laws.aspx> (last visited May 1, 2015); AschA.MarmorR., “Assisted Reproduction,” in CrowleyM., ed., From Birth to Death and Bench to Clinic: The Hastings Center Bioethics Briefing Book for Journalists, Policymakers, and Campaigns (Garrison, NY: The Hastings Center, 2008): 5–10.
22.
La. Rev. Stat § 9:122 (2011).
23.
Ind.Code § 35-46-5-3 (2014).
24.
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 36–1702 (2011).
25.
Cal. Health & Safety Code § 125325.15 (2009).
26.
See KalfoglouGeller, supra note 2.
27.
American Society for Reproductive Medicine, “2006 Guidelines for Gamete and Embryo Donation,”Fertility and Sterility86, no. 5 (2006): S38–S50.
28.
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, “Financial Compensation of Oocyte Donors,”Fertility and Sterility88, no. 2 (2007): 305–309 [hereinafter Financial Compensation].
29.
Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine, “Repetitive Oocyte Donation,”Fertility and Sterility90, no. 5, Supp. (2008): S194–S195 [hereinafter Repetitive Donation].
30.
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, “Using Family Members as Gamete Donors or Surrogates,”Fertility and Sterility98no. 4 (2012): 797–803 [hereinafter Family Members].
31.
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, “Donating Spare Embryos for Stem Cell Research,”Fertility and Sterility91, no. 3 (2009): 667–670 [hereinafter Spare Embryos].
32.
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, “Interests, Obligations and Rights of the Donor in Gamete Donation,”Fertility and Sterility102, no. 3 (2012): 675–681 [hereinafter Rights of the Donor].
33.
See Financial Compensation, supra note 28.
34.
LevineA. D., “Self-Regulation, Compensation, and the Ethical Recruitment of Oocyte Donors,”Hastings Center Report40, no. 2 (2010): 25–36.
35.
AlbertaH. B.BerryR. M.LevineA. D., “Compliance with Donor Age Recommendations in Oocyte Donor Recruitment Advertisements in the USA,”Reproductive Biomedicine Online26, no. 4 (2013): 400–405 [hereinafter Donor Age Recommendations].
36.
AlbertaH. B.BerryR. M.LevineA. D., “Risk Disclosure and the Recruitment of Oocyte Donors: Are Advertisers Telling the Full Story?”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics42, no. 2 (2014): 232–243 [hereinafter Risk Disclosure and Recruitment].
37.
KeehnJ.HolwellE.Abdul-KarimR.ChinL. J.LeuC.SauerM. V.KlitzmanR., “Recruiting Egg Donors Online: An Analysis of in Vitro Fertilization Clinic and Agency Websites' Adherence to American Society for Reproductive Medicine Guidelines,”Fertility and Sterility98, no. 4 (2012): 995–1000.
38.
LukJ.PetrozzaJ. C., “Evaluation of Compliance and Range of Fees among American Society for Reproductive Medicine-Listed Egg Donor and Surrogacy Agencies,”Journal of Reproductive Medicine53, no. 11 (2008): 847–852.
39.
Kamakahi v. Am. Soc'y Reprod. Med., No. C 11–01781, 2013 WL 1768706 (U.S. Dist. N. Cal 2013).
40.
KrawiecK. D., “Egg-Donor Price Fixing and Kamakahi v. American Society for Reproductive Medicine,”The Virtual Mentor: VM16, no. 1 (2014): 57–62.
41.
KenneyN. J.McGowanM. L., “Looking Back: Egg Donors' Retrospective Evaluations of Their Motivations, Expectations and Experiences During Their First Donation Cycle,”Fertility and Sterility93, no. 2 (2010): 455–466.
42.
LindheimS. R.FrumovitzM.SauerM. V., “Recruitment and Screening Policies and Procedures Used to Establish a Paid Donor Oocyte Registry,”Human Reproduction13, no. 7 (1998): 2020–2024.
43.
See KalfoglouGeller, supra note 2.
44.
See Financial Compensation, supra note 28.
45.
Id.
46.
See DisclosureRiskRecruitment, supra note 36.
47.
See Levine, supra note 34.
48.
See Keehn, supra note 37.
49.
GurmankinA. D., “Risk Information Provided to Prospective Oocyte Donors in a Preliminary Phone Call,”American Journal of Bioethics1, no. 4 (2001): 3–13.
50.
Id.
51.
Id; CialdiniR. B.CacioppoJ. T.BassettR.MillerJ. A., “Low-Ball Procedure for Producing Compliance: Commitment Then Cost,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology36, no. 5 (1978): 463–476.
52.
TverskyA.KahnemanD., “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,”Science185, no. 4157 (1974): 1124–1131; BrewerN. T.ChapmanG. B.SchwartzJ. A.BergusG. R., “The Influence of Irrelevant Anchors on the Judgments and Choices of Doctors and Patients,”Medical Decision Making27, no. 2 (2007): 203–211.
53.
See Gurmankin, supra note 49.
54.
Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine, and Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, “Recommendations for Gamete and Embryo Donation: A Committee Opinion,”Fertility and sterility99, no. 1 (2013): 47–62.
55.
See Donor Age Recommendations, supra note 35.
56.
AlmelingR., “Selling Genes, Selling Gender: Egg Agencies, Sperm Banks, and the Medical Market in Genetic Material,”American Sociological Review72, no. 3 (June 2007): 319–340.
57.
Id.; see LindheimFrumovitzSauer, supra note 42.
58.
See LindheimFrumovitzSauer, supra note 42.
59.
The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law, Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Analysis and Recommendations for Public Policy (New York: The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law, 1998); RobertsonJ. A., “Is There an Ethical Problem Here?”Hastings Center Report40, no. 2 (2010): 3; see Rights of the Donor, supra note 32.
60.
See Almeling, supra note 56.
61.
Id.
62.
See KenneyMcGowan, supra note 41.
63.
Id.
64.
SkillernA. A.CedarsM. I.HuddlestonH. G., “Oocyte Donors' Comprehension as Assessed by the EDICT (Egg Donor Informed Consent Tool),”Fertility and Sterility101, no. 1 (2014): 248–251.
65.
CrockinS. L.DaarJ., “American Society for Reproductive Medicine Updated Consent Forms,”Virtual Mentor16, no. 4 (April 2014): 302–303.
66.
See KalfoglouGeller, supra note 2.
67.
See Rights of the Donor, supra note 32.
68.
Id.
69.
SchaeferG. O.SinaiiN.GradyC., “Informing Egg Donors of the Potential for Embryonic Research: A Survey of Consent Forms from US in Vitro Fertilization Clinics,”Fertility and Sterility97, no. 2 (2012): 427–433.
70.
Id.
71.
Id.
72.
BodriD.GuillénJ. J.PoloA.TrullenqueM.EsteveC.CollO., “Complications Related to Ovarian Stimulation and Oocyte Retrieval in 4052 Oocyte Donor Cycles,”Reproductive Biomedicine Online17, no. 2 (2008): 237–243; MaxwellK. N.CholstI. N.RosenwaksZ., “The Incidence of Both Serious and Minor Complications in Young Women Undergoing Oocyte Donation,”Fertility and Sterility90, no. 6 (2008): 2165–2171.
KushnirV. A.KhannaP.BaradD. A.GleicherN., “Establishment of Comparative Performance Criteria for IVF Centers: Correlation of Live Birth Rates in Autologous and Donor Oocyte IVF Cycles,”Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology12, no. 1 (2014): 122.
76.
See Financial Compensation, supra note 28.
77.
See Kawwass, supra note 3.
78.
SunkaraS. K.RittenbergV.Raine-FenningN.BhattacharyaS.ZamoraJ.CoomarasamyA., “Association between the Number of Eggs and Live Birth in IVF Treatment: An Analysis of 400 135 Treatment Cycles,”Human Reproduction26, no. 7 (2011): 1768–1774.
79.
BodriD., “Risk and Complications Associated with Egg Donation,” in SauerM. V., ed., Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation (Springer: London, 2013): At 205–219.
80.
See Kawwass, supra note 3.
81.
See KalfoglouGeller, supra note 2.
82.
See Almeling, supra note 56.
83.
See Financial Compensation, supra note 28.
84.
See Keehn, supra note 37.
85.
See Repetitive Donation, supra note 29.
86.
See KenneyMcGowan, supra note 41.
87.
AlmelingR., Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm (University of California Press, 2011): At 119.
TruogR. D., “The Ethics of Organ Donation by Living Donors,”New England Journal of Medicine353, no. 5 (2005): 444–446.
96.
See Family Members, supra note 30.
97.
McKneallyM. F., “Beyond Disclosure: Managing Conflicts of Interest to Strengthen Trust in Our Profession,”Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery133, no. 2 (2007): 300–302.
98.
See Financial Compensation, supra note 28.
99.
Id.
100.
Stiver v. Parker, 975 F.2d 261 (6th Cir. 1992).
101.
See KalfoglouGeller, supra note 2.
102.
Id.
103.
See Family Members, supra note 30; Financial Compensation, supra note 28; EmbryosSpare, supra note 31.
Moore v. Regents of the University of California, 793 P2d 479 (S. Ct. Cal. 1990); Murthy v. Abbott Labs., 847 F. Supp. 2d 958, 972 n.5 (S.D. Tex. 2012).
107.
See KalfoglouGeller, supra note 2.
108.
See Dickenson, supra note 10; DanielsHeidt-Forsythe, supra note 15; KenneyMcGowan, supra note 40.
109.
See McKneally, supra note 97.
110.
CainD. M.LoewensteinG.MooreD. A., “The Dirt on Coming Clean: Perverse Effects of Disclosing Conflicts of Interest,”Journal of Legal Studies34, no. 1 (2005): 1–25.
111.
See KalfoglouGeller, supra note 2.
112.
See Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act, supra note 12.