HallM. A., “The Legal and Historical Foundations of Patients as Medical Consumers,”Georgetown Law Journal96, no. 2 (2008): 583–597, at 585 n.8.
2.
PickeringW. G., “A Nation of People Called Patients,”Journal of Medical Ethics17, no. 2 (1991): 91–92, at 91.
3.
NeubergerJ.TallisR., “Do We Need a New Word for Patients?”British Medical Journal318, no. 7222 (1999): 1756–1758, at 1756, 1757. See also Hall, supra note 1, at 585.
4.
HallM. A.SchneiderC. E., “Patients as Consumers: Courts, Contracts and the New Medical Marketplace,”Michigan Law Review106, no. 4 (2008): 643–689, at 688.
5.
Id., at 652, 688. See also TomesN., “Patients or Health Care Consumers? Why the History of Contested Terms Matters,” in StevensR. A.RosenbergC. E.BurnsJ. R., eds., History and Health Policy in the United States: Putting the Past Back In (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2006): At 106.
6.
See Tomes, supra note 5, at 85, 87.
7.
Id.
8.
See Pickering, supra note 2.
9.
See NeubergerTallis, supra note 3, at 1756–1757.
10.
See Hall, supra note 1, at 584; Hall and Schneider, supra note 4, at 647. Until recent years, however, health insurance has most often covered “in-network” services and not given care seekers incentives to research health care costs or seek out the least expensive providers.
11.
HerzbergS. R., “Client or Patient: Which Term Is More Appropriate for Use in Occupational Therapy?”American Journal of Occupational Therapy44, no. 6 (1990): 561–564, at 562.
12.
LoudonJ., “Patients, Clients, Users or Customers: What Should We Call People Attending Sexual Health Services?”Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care38, no. 1 (2012): 19–22, at 19, 21; see Hall, supra note 1, at 584.
13.
See Herzberg, supra note 11, at 561; AnnasG., Some Choice: Law, Medicine, and the Market (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998): At 46.
14.
See Tomes, supra note 5, at 83.
15.
ArrowK. J., “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care,”American Economic Review53, no. 5 (1963): 941–73, at 965.
16.
See Tomes, supra note 5, at 85.
17.
See Hall, supra note 1, at 585.
18.
RaphaelB.EmersonB., “Are Patients Clients or People?”Medical Journal of Australia154, no. 3 (1991): 183–184, at 184.
19.
RamdassM. J., “Question of ‘Patients’ Versus 'Clients,”Journal of Qualitative Clinical Practice21, no. 1–2 (2001): 14–15; WingP. C., “Patient or Client? If in Doubt, Ask,”Canadian Medical Association Journal157, no. 3 (1997): 287–280; SimmonsP., “Service User, Patient, Client, User or Survivor: Describing Recipients of Mental Health Services,”Psychiatrist Online34, no. 1 (2010): 20–23; NairB. R., “Patient, Client, or Customer?”Medical Journal of Australia169, no. 11–12 (1998): 593; McGuire-SnieckusR.McCabeR.PriebeS., “Patient, Client or Service User? A Survey of Patient Preferences of Dress and Address of Six Mental Health Professions,”Psychiatric Bulletin27, no. 8 (2003): 305–308.
20.
EvansD., “Commodification,” in SouthertonD., ed., Encyclopedia of Consumer Culture, vol. 1 (Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2011): 212–214, at 212; ErtmanM.WilliamsJ., “Preface: Freedom, Equality, and the Many Futures of Commodification,” in ErtmanM.WilliamsJ., eds., Rethinking Commodification (New York City: New York University Press, 2005): 1–7, at 1.
RadinM. J., “Market Inalienability,”Harvard Law Review100, no. 8 (1987): 1849–1937.
26.
505 U.S. 833 (1992).
27.
See SiegelR. B., “The Right's Reasons: Constitutional Conflict and the Spread of Women-Protective Anti-Abortion Argument,”Duke Law Journal57, no. 6 (2008): 1641–1692.
28.
Missouri Right to Life, “Missouri House Passes Legislation That Extends Reflection Period to 72 Hours and Requires Parental Notification,” May 13, 2014, available at <http://missourilife.org/news/2014/2014-03-12.html> (last visited April 10, 2015).
SchneidermanD., “Constitutionalizing the Culture-Ideology of Consumerism,”Social and Legal Studies7, no. 2 (1998): 213–238, at 219.
31.
Id., at 218–219.
32.
TaylorJ. S., The Public Life of the Fetal Sonogram: Technology, Consumption, and the Politics of Reproduction (Rutgers: Rutgers University Press, 2008): At 118–119.
33.
RadinM. J.SunderM., “Introduction: The Subject and Object of Commodification, in Rethinking Commodification,” in Rethinking Commodification, supra note 20.
34.
FletcherR., “Legal Form, Commodities and Reproduction: Reading Pashukanis,” in DrakopoulouM., ed., Feminist Encounters with Legal Philosophy (New York: Routledge, 2013): At 138–157.
35.
KrawiecK., “The Dark Side of Commodification Critiques: Politics and Elitism in Standardized Testing,”Washington University Journal of Law and Policy35 (2011): 349–362, at 350–354; CohenI. G., “The Price of Everything, the Value of Nothing: Reframing the Commodification Debate,”Harvard Law Review117, no. 2 (2003): 689–710, at 690–691.
36.
ZelizerV. A., The Purchase of Intimacy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007): At 22.
37.
See Radin, supra note 25.
38.
PellegrinoE. D., “The Commodification of Medical and Health Care: The Moral Consequences of a Paradigm Shift from a Professional to a Market Ethic,”Journal of Medicine and Philosophy24, no. 3 (1999): 243–66, at 252.
39.
Id.
40.
PetcheskyR., “The Body as Property: A Feminist Re-vision,” in GinsburgF.D.RappR., eds., Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995): At 387–406. See also DuxburyN., “Do Markets Degrade?”Modern Law Review59, no. 3 (1996): 331–348, at 343.
41.
See Krawiec, supra note 35, at 349–350.
42.
See RadinSunder, supra note 33, at 13; Zelizer, supra note 36; SatzD., Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012): At 11; SandelM. J., What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2012): At 15.
43.
ErtmanM. M., “What's Wrong With a Parenthood Market? A New and Improved Theory of Commodification,” in Rethinking Commodification, supra note 20.
I am indebted to I. Glenn Cohen for this observation.
47.
KrawiecK., “Altruism and Intermediation in the Market for Babies,”Washington and Lee Law Review66, no. 1 (2009): 203–257, at 241.
48.
Id., at 75.
49.
SassatelliR., Consumer Culture: History, Theory and Politics (Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc., 2007): At 115, 142.
50.
BeckerG., “Selling Hope: Commercialization and Consumption of the New Reproductive Technologies in the United States,”Sciences Sociales et Sante18, no. 4 (2000): 105–126, at 109, 120.
51.
SchneiderC. E.HallM. A., “The Patient Life: Can Consumers Direct Health Care?”American Journal of Law and Medicine35, no. 1 (2009): 7–65, at 14.
52.
See Becker, supra note 50, at 116–117.
53.
MadeiraJ., “Woman Scorned: Resurrecting Infertile Women's Decision-Making Autonomy,”Maryland Law Review71, no. 2 (2012): 339–410, at 366.
54.
HarrisL., “Dynamics of Stigma in Abortion Work: Findings from a Pilot Study of the Providers Share Workshop,”Social Science & Medicine73, no. 7 (2011): 1062–1070, at 1062–63.
55.
See Krawiec, supra note 47, at 213.
56.
HawkinsJ., “Selling ART: An Empirical Assessment of Advertising on Fertility Clinics' Websites,”Indiana Law Journal88, no. 4 (2013): 1147–1179, at 1149.
57.
HawkinsJ., “Doctors as Bankers: Evidence From Fertility Markets,”Tulane Law Review84, no. 4 (2010): 841–898, at 843, 849.
BreittonK., “Surrogate Motherhood, Disability, and Abortion in the Case of ‘Baby S,”’Penn Bioethics JournalVIII, no. ii (2012): 8–9, at 8.
79.
HouleK. L. F., Responsibility, Complexity, and Abortion: Toward a New Image of Ethical Thought (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2014): At 86.
80.
See RobertsS., “Out-of-Pocket Costs and Insurance Coverage for Abortion in the United States,”Women's Health Issues24, no. 2 (March-April 2014): e211–e218.
81.
See, e.g., ChelstowskaA., “Stigmatisation and Commercialisation of Abortion Services in Poland: Turning Sin into Gold,”Reproductive Health Matters19, no. 37 (2011): 98–106; WolfeA., Whose Keeper? Social Science and Moral Obligation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989): At 240.
82.
GitlowH. S., “Abortion Services: Time for a Discussion of Marketing Policies,”Journal of Marketing42, no. 2 (1978): 71–82, at 72; GarbarinoK., The Abortion Business: A Report on Free-Standing Abortion Clinics (Cambridge, MA: Women's Research Action Project, 1975).
83.
See Todd, supra note 74, at 405.
84.
HoffmanM., Intimate Wars: The Life and Times of the Woman Who Brought Abortion from the Back Alley to the Boardroom (New York: Feminist Press at CUNY, 2012): At 82.
85.
Id., at 183.
86.
Id., at 184.
87.
SimondsW., Abortion at Work: Ideology and Practice in a Feminist Clinic (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1996): At 108.
88.
FletcherR., “Reproductive Consumption: Adapting British Abortion Services to Irish Women's Needs,” Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association (May 27, 2004), available at <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/1/7/0/6/p117062_index.html?phpsessid=6nfu69vna6a7t4du8q7s866nc2> (last visited April 10, 2015); WhittakerA.SpeierA., “‘Cycling Overseas’: Care, Commodification, and Stratification in Cross-Border Reproductive Travel,”Medical Anthropology29, no. 4 (2010): 363–383.
89.
See Sassatelli, supra note 49, at 154.
90.
Id., at 154, 156.
91.
Id., at 156.
92.
See Madeira, supra note 53.
93.
See Sassatelli, supra note 49, at 156–157.
94.
Id., at 160.
95.
Id.
96.
Id., at 197.
97.
GalvinR. S., “Consumerism and Controversy: A Conversation with Regina Herzlinger,”Health Affairs26, no. 5 (2007): 552–59, at 553.
KorobkinR., “Comparative Effectiveness Research As Choice Architecture: The Behavioral Law and Economics Solutions to the Health Care Cost Crisis,”Michigan Law Review112, no. 4 (2014): 523–574, at 525.
BitlerM.SchmidtL., “Health Disparities and Infertility: Impacts of State Level Insurance Mandates,”Fertility and Sterility85, no. 4 (2006): 858–865; StephenE. H.ChandraA., “Use of Infertility Services in the United States: 1995,”Family Planning Perspectives32, no. 3 (2000): 132–137.
115.
See DomarA., “A Prospective Investigation into the Reasons Why Insured United States Patients Drop Out of In Vitro Fertilization Treatment,”Fertility & Sterility94, no. 4 (September 2010): 1457–1459.
116.
See Guttmacher Institute, “Characteristics of Women Having Abortions,”available at <http://www.guttmacher.org/in-the-know/characteristics.html> (last visited April 10, 2015) (reporting that women with family incomes below the federal poverty level account for more than 40% of abortions, whereas those with incomes 200% above the poverty line have abortions at half the national rate).
CohenI. G., “Protecting Patients with Passports: Medical Tourism and the Patient-Protective Argument,”Iowa Law Review95, no. 5 (2010): 1467–1567, at 1507–1508.
122.
See SchneiderHall, supra note 51; Korobkin, supra note 99, at 531–538.
123.
See Kaiser Family Foundation, supra note 108.
124.
See MadisonK., “Regulating Health Care Quality in an Information Age,”U.C. Davis Law Review40, no. 5 (2007): 1577–1654.
125.
See Gawande, supra note 107.
126.
See Galvin, supra note 97, at 557–558.
127.
See Korobkin, supra note 99, at 527.
128.
SwansonK., “The Doctor's Dilemma: Paternalism in the Medicolegal History of Assisted Reproduction and Abortion,”Intersections in Reproduction: Perspectives on Abortion, Assisted Reproductive Technologies, and Judicial Review, Program for the Study of Reproductive Justice, Yale Law School, April 2014.