Left to their own devices: “Medtronic and the Woes of America's Medical-Technology Industry,”The Economist, September 11, 2011, available at <http://www.economist.com/node/21528644>(last visited December 5, 2014).
3.
AvornJ.KesselheimA., “The NIH Translational Research Center Might Trade Public Risk for Private Reward,”Nature Medicine17, no. 10(2011): 1176.
4.
MunosB. H.ChinW. W., “How to Revive Breakthrough Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry,”Science Translational Medicine3, no. 89(2011): 9cm16.
5.
ArrowsmithJ., “Trial Watch: Phase II Failures: 2008–2010,”Nature Reviews Drug Discovery10, no. 5(May 2011): 328–329.
JulianoR., “Pharmaceutical Innovation and Public Policy: The Case for a New Strategy for Drug Discovery and Development,”Science and Public Policy40, no. 3(2013): 393–405.
8.
PaulS. M.MytelkaD. S.DunwiddieC. T., “How to Improve R&D Productivity: The Pharmaceutical Industry's Grand Challenge,”Nature Reviews Drug Discovery9, no. 3(2010): 203–214.
9.
ChabnerB. A.RobertsT. G.Jr., “Timeline: Chemotherapy and the War on Cancer,”Nature Reviews Cancer5, no. 1(2005): 65–72.
10.
CutlerD. M.McClellanM., “Is Technological Change in Medicine Worth It?”Health Affairs (Millwood)20, no. 5(2001): 11–29.
HannaK. E.ManningF. J.BouxseinP.PopeA., Innovation and Invention in Medical Devices: Workshop Summary, Institute of Medicine (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2001).
13.
KrucoffM. W.BrindisR. G.HodgsonP. K.MackM. J.HolmesD. R.Jr., “Medical Device Innovation: Prospective Solutions for an Ecosystem in Crisis: Adding a Professional Society Perspective,”JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions5, no. 7(2012): 790–796.
14.
UblS. J., “The Medical Device Excise Tax – Before It Begins?”New England Journal of Medicine369, no. 10(2013): 984.
15.
StaffC., “Internal Memorandum: Ten Bills to Fix FDA's Medical Device Regulation: Saving American Jobs and Saving American Patients,” Commerce HoRCoEa, Washington, D.C., 2011.
16.
ShermanR. E.LiJ.ShapleyS.RobbM.WoodcockJ., “Expediting Drug Development: The FDA's New ‘Breakthrough Therapy’ Designation,”New England Journal of Medicine369, no. 20(2013): 1877–1880.
17.
See Kesselheim and Avorn, supra note 3.
18.
DruckerP. F., “The Discipline of Innovation,”Harvard Business Review63, no. 3(1985): 67–72.
19.
KesselheimA. S.AvornJ., “The Most Transformative Drugs of the past 25 Years: A Survey of Physicians,”Nature Reviews Drug Discovery12, no. 6(2013): 425–431.
20.
ConstasM. A., “Qualitative Analysis as a Public Event: The Documentation of Category Development Procedures,”American Educational Research Journal29, no. 2(1992): 253–266.
21.
BradleyE. H.HolmboeE. S.MatteraJ. A.RoumanisS. A.RadfordM. J.KrumholzH. M., “A Qualitative Study of Increasing Beta-Blocker Use after Myocardial Infarction: Why Do Some Hospitals Succeed?”JAMA285, no. 20(2001): 2604–2611.
22.
WillmsD. G.BestJ. A.TaylorD. W., “A Systematic Approach for Using Qualitative Methods in Primary Prevention Research,”Medical Anthropology Quarterly4, no. 4(1990): 391–409.
23.
DruckerP. F., “The Discipline of Innovation,”Harvard Business Review63, no. 3(1985): 67–72.
24.
SchmooklerJ., Invention and Economic Growth (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966).
25.
ShaneS.VenkataramanS., “The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research,”Academy of Management Review25, no. 1(2000): 217–226.
26.
SarasonY.DeanT.DillardJ. R., “Entrepreneurship as the Nexus of Individual and Opportunity: A Structuration View,”Journal of Business Venturing21, no. 3(2006): 286–305.
27.
EichlerH. G.Bloechl-DaumB.BrasseurD., “The Risks of Risk Aversion in Drug Regulation,”Nature Reviews Drug Discovery12, no. 12(2013): 907–916.
28.
KesselheimA. S.XuS.AvornJ., “Clinicians' Contributions to the Development of Coronary Artery Stents: A Qualitative Study of Transformative Device Innovation,”PloS One9, no. 2(2014): e88664.
29.
Tralau-StewartC. J.WyattC. A.KleynD. E.AyadA., “Drug Discovery: New Models for Industry-Academic Partnerships,”Drug Discovery Today14, nos. 1–2(2009): 95–101.
30.
MeleseT.LinS. M.ChangJ. L.CohenN. H., “Open Innovation Networks between Academia and Industry: An Imperative for Breakthrough Therapies,”Nature Medicine15, no. 5(2009): 502–507.
31.
SwinneyD. C.AnthonyJ., “How Were New Medicines Discovered?”Nature Reviews Drug Discovery10, no. 7(2011): 507–519.
32.
AgarwalP.SearlsD. B., “Can Literature Analysis Identify Innovation Drivers in Drug Discovery?”Nature Reviews Drug Discovery8, no. 11(2009): 865–878.
33.
ZinnerD. E.Bolcic-JankovicD.ClarridgeB.BlumenthalD.CampbellE. G., “Participation of Academic Scientists in Relationships with Industry,”Health Affairs (Millwood)28, no. 6(2009): 1814–1825.
34.
FeldmanM.DesrochersP., “Truth for Its Own Sake: Academic Culture and Technology Transfer at Johns Hopkins University,”Minerva42, no. 2(2004): 105–126.
35.
JongS., “How Organizational Structures in Science Shape Spin-Off Firms: The Biochemistry Departments of Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF and the Birth of the Biotech Industry,”Industrial and Corporate Change115, no. 2(2006): 251–283.
36.
See Melese, supra note 23.
37.
BlumenthalD.CampbellE. G.CausinoN.LouisK. S., “Participation of Life-Science Faculty in Research Relationships with Industry,”New England Journal of Medicine335, no. 23(1996): 1734–1739.
38.
BokD. C., Beyond the Ivory Tower: Social Responsibilities of the Modern University (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982).
39.
KrimskyS., Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefiel, 2003).
40.
AzoulayP.DingW.StuartT., The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research Output,”Journal of Industrial Economics57, no. 4(2009): 637–676.
41.
GrimaldiR.KenneyM.SiegelD. S.WrightM., “30 Years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship,”Research Policy40, no. 8(2011): 1045–1057.
42.
KenneyM.PattonD., “Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model,”Research Policy38, no. 9(2009): 1407–1422.
43.
SwamidassP. M.VulasaV., “Why University Inventions Rarely Produce Income? Bottlenecks in University Technology Transfer,”Journal of Technology Transfer34, no. 4(2009): 343–363.
44.
See KenneyPatton, supra note 33.
45.
InnesC., “Best Practices in Transforming Research into Innovation: Creative Approaches to the Bayh-Dole Act,”U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation, 2012.
46.
XuS.AvornJ.KesselheimA. S., “Origins of Medical Innovation: The Case of Coronary Artery Stents,”Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes5, no. 6(2012): 743–749.
47.
ScannellJ. W.BlanckleyA.BoldonH.WarringtonB., “Diagnosing the Decline in Pharmaceutical R&D Efficiency,”Nature Reviews Drug Discovery11, no. 3(2012): 191–200.
48.
FernandezJ. M.SteinR. M.LoA. W., “Commercializing Biomedical Research through Securitization Techniques,”Nature Biotechnology30, no. 10(2012): 964–975.
49.
See MunosChin, supra note 3.
50.
PaulsenE.AltmireJ., “New Tax Will Hurt Medical Device Innovation,”The Hill's Congress Blog vol. 2013, 2012.
51.
BloomJ.TorreeleE., “Should Patents on Pharmaceuticals Be Extended to Encourage Innovation?”Wall Street Journal, January 23, 2012.
52.
See Staff, supra note 11.
53.
EbersoleT. J.GuthrieM. C.GoldsteinJ. A., “Patent Pools and Standard Setting in Diagnostic Genetics,”Nature Biotechnology23, no. 8(2005): 937–938.
54.
HunterJ.StephensS., “Is Open Innovation the Way Forward for Big Pharma?”Nature Reviews Drug Discovery9, no. 2(2010): 87–88.