WolfS., Managing Incidental Findings and Research Results in Genomic Research Involving Biobanks and Archived Data Sets, Genetics in Medicine14, no. 4 (2012): 361–384.
2.
HodkinsonK., The Need to Know – Therapeutic Privilege: A Way Forward, Health Care Analysis21, no. 2 (2013): 105–129.
3.
ChadwickR.LevittM., and ShinckleD., eds., The Right to Know and Right Not to Know (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company, 1997).
4.
WertzD.FletcherJ. C., eds., Ethics and Human Genetics: A Cross-Cultural Perspective (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1989).
5.
BennettR., Antenatal Genetic Testing and the Right to Remain in Ignorance, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics22, no. 5 (2001): 461–471.
6.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, 1997, art. 5c.
7.
Council of Europe, Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (Oveido Convention), 1997, art. 10(2).
8.
World Medical Association (WMA), Declaration of Lisbon on the Rights of the Patient, 1981 (revised in 2005), art. 7(d)
9.
Public Population Project in Genomics and Society, available at <http://p3g.org/> (last visited January 31, 2014).
10.
European Society of Human Genetics, available at <https://www.eshg.org/> (last visited January 31, 2014).
11.
KnoppersB. M.DescheCnesM.ZawatiM. H., and TasséeA.-M., Population Studies: Return of Research Results and Incidental Findings Policy Statement, European Journal of Human Genetics21, no. 3 (2013): 245–247.
12.
Van ElC. G.CornelM. C., and DondorpW., Whole Genome Sequencing and Analysis and the Challenges for Health Care Professionals: Recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics, European Journal of Human Genetics21, no. 6 (2013): 580–584.
13.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, December 2010.
14.
Id., at art. 13.2
15.
Id., at art. 13.3
16.
Id., at art. 3.4
17.
Id.
18.
Id., at art. 13.3
19.
Finding of Rare Disease Genes in Canada (FORGE Canada) – Adult consent form.
20.
KnoppersB. M., Paediatric Research and the Communication of Not-So Incidental Findings, Journal of the Canadian Paediatric Society14 no. 4 (2012): 190–192.
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, Privacy and Progress in Whole Genome Sequencing, Recommendation 3.3 (October 2012), available at <http://bioethics.gov/cms/node/764> (last visited January 31, 2014).
23.
GreenR. C.BergJ. S., and GrodyW. W. for The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, ACMG Recommendations for Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing, Genetics in Medicine15, no. 7 (2013): 565–574.
24.
See supra note 5, at 469.
25.
RhodesR., Genetic Testing: Is There a Right Not to Know?MCN/The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing31, no. 3 (2006): 145.
26.
ThorogoodA.KnoppersB. M., Whole-Genome Sequencing and the Physician, Clinical Genetics81, no. 6 (2012): 511–513.
27.
TaborH. K.BerkmanB. E.HullS. C., and BamshadM. J., Genomics Really Gets Personal: How Exome and Whole Genome Sequencing Challenge the Ethical Framework of Human Genetics Research, American Journal of Medical GeneticsPart A 155, no. 12 (2011): 2916–2924.