SnowC.Hoefnagel-HöihleM., “The Critical Period for Language Acquisition: Evidence from Second Language Learning,”Child Development49, no. 4 (1978): 1114–1128.
2.
LennebergE., Biological Foundations of Language (New York: Wiley, 1967);
3.
WoodsB. T.CareyS., “Language Deficits after Apparent Clinical Recovery from Childhood Aphasia,”Annals of Neurology6, no. 5 (1979: 405–409;.
4.
MartinsI. P., “Persistent Acquired Childhood Aphasia,” in FabroF., ed., Neurogenic Language Disorders in Children (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004): At 231–251.
5.
ShattuckR., The Forbidden Experiment: The Story of the Wild Boy of Aveyron (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1980).
6.
CurtissS., “Language as a Cognitive System: Its Independence and Selective Vulnerability,” in OteroC., ed., Noam Chomsky: Critical Assessments: 4 (London: Routledge, 1994): At 211–255;.
7.
DruryS. S.TheallK. P.GleasonM. M.SmykeA. T.DevivoI.WongJ. Y. Y.FoxN. A.ZeanahC. H.NelsonC. A., “Telomere Length and Early Severe Social Deprivation: Linking Early Adversity and Cellular Aging,”Molecular Psychiatry17, no. 7 (2011: 719–727.
8.
MayberryR.FischerS., “Looking through Phonological Shape to Lexical Meaning: The Bottleneck of Non-native Sign Language Processing,”Memory and Cognition17, no. 6 (1989): 740–754;.
9.
NewportE., “Maturational Constraints on Language Learning,”Cognitive Science14, no. 1 (1990: 11–28;.
10.
EmmoreyK.CorinaD., “Lexical Recognition in Sign Language: Effects of Phonetic Structure and Morphology,”Perceptual and Motor Skills71, no. 3f (1990): 1227–1252;
11.
EmmoreyK., “Repetition Priming with Aspect and Agreement Morphology in American Sign Language,”Journal of Psycholinguistic Research20, no. 5 (1991: 365–388;.
12.
MayberryR.EichenE., “The Long-lasting Advantage of Learning Sign Language in Childhood: Another Look at the Critical Period for Language Acquisition,”Journal of Memory and Language30, no. 4 (1991: 486–512;.
13.
see Curtiss, supra note 4;.
14.
GrimshawG.AdelsteinA.BrydenM.MacKinnonG., “First-Language Acquisition in Adolescence: Evidence for a Critical Period for Verbal Language Development,”Brain and Language63, no. 2 (1998: 237–255;.
15.
NewportE.BavelierD.NevilleH. J., “Critical Thinking about Critical Periods: Perspectives on a Critical Period for Language Acquisition,” in DupouxE., ed., Language, Brain, and Cognitive Development: Essays in Honor of Jacques Mehler (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001): At 481–502;.
HumphriesT.KushalnagarP.MathurG.NapoliD. J.PaddenC.RathmannC.SmithS., “Bilingualism: A Pearl to Overcome Certain Perils of Cochlear Implants,”Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology21, no. 2 (2013).
19.
For an overview and citations,
20.
see KushalnagarP.MathurG.MorelandC. J.NapoliD. J.OsterlingW.PaddenC.RathmannC., “Infants and Children with Hearing Loss Need Early Language Access,”Journal of Clinical Ethics21, no. 2 (2010): 143–154.
21.
For an overview and citations,
22.
see HumphriesT.KushalnagarP.MathurG.NapoliD. J.PaddenC.RathmannC.SmithS., “Language Acquisition for Deaf Children: Reducing the Harms of Zero Tolerance to the Use of Alternative Approaches,”Harm Reduction Journal9, no. 16 (2012), available at <http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/16> (last visited November 6, 2013).
23.
MeschJ., Tactile Sign Language: Turn Taking and Question in Signed Conversations of Deaf-Blind People (Camarillo, CA: Signum, 2001).
24.
NewportE.SupallaT., “A Critical Period Effect in the Acquisition of a Primary Language” (unpublished manuscript from University of Rochester, 1987);
25.
JohnsonJ. S.NewportE., “Critical Period Effects in Second Language Learning: The Influence of Maturational State on the Acquisition of English as a Second Language,”Cognitive Psychology21, no. 1 (1989): 60–99;.
26.
see Newport, supra note 5;.
27.
GalvanD., “Differences in the Use of American Sign Language Morphology by Deaf Children: Implication of Parents and Teachers,”American Annals of the Deaf144, no. 4 (1999: 320–324;.
28.
Boyes BraemP., “Rhythmic Temporal Patterns in the Signing of Deaf Early and Late Learners of Swiss German Sign Language,”Language and Speech42, nos. 2–3 (1999: 177–208;.
29.
HelmuthL., “From the Mouths (and Hands) of Babes,”Science293, no. 5536 (2001: 1758–1759;.
30.
SingletonJ.NewportE., “When Learners Surpass Their Models: The Acquisition of American Sign Language from Inconsistent Input,”Cognitive Psychology49, no. 4 (2004: 370–407;.
31.
MorfordJ.Hänel-FaulhaberB., “Homesigners as Late Learners: Connecting the Dots from Delayed Acquisition in Childhood to Sign Language Processing in Adulthood,”Language and Linguistics Compass5, no. 8 (2011: 535–537;.
32.
among many.
33.
ChamberlainC.MayberryR., “Theorizing about the Relation between American Sign Language and Reading,” in ChamberlainC.MorfordJ.MayberryR., eds., Language Acquisition by Eye (Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum, 2000): At 221–259;.
34.
Goldin-MeadowS.MayberryR., “How do Profoundly Deaf Children Learn to Read?”Learning Disabilities Research & Practice16, no. 4 (2001): 221–228;.
35.
MooresD., “Print Literacy: The Acquisition of Reading and Writing Skills,” in MooresD.MartinD., eds., Deaf Learners: Developments in Curriculum and Instruction (Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press, 2006): At 41–55;.
36.
AllenT. E.HwangY.StanskyA., “Measuring Factors That Predict Deaf Students' Reading Abilities: The VL2 Toolkit Project Design and Early Findings,”paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of College Educators of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, New Orleans, LA, March 2009;.
37.
among many.
38.
SchickB.MarscharkM.SpencerP., Advances in the Sign Language Development of Deaf Children (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).
39.
See Humphries, supra note 8.
40.
NewportE.MeierR., “The Acquisition of American Sign Language,” in SlobinD. I., ed., The Cross-Linguistic Study of Language Acquisition (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1985): At 881–938;.
41.
PetittoL. A.MarentetteP. F., “Babbling in the Manual Mode: Evidence for the Ontogeny of Language,”Science251, no. 5000 (1991: 1493–1496;.
Institute for Educational Equity & Opportunity, Education in the 50 States: A Deskbook of the History of State Constitutions and Laws about Education (Washington, D.C. and Philadelphia: IFEEO, 2008).
ChenA. H.YoudelmanM. K.BrooksJ., “The Legal Framework for Language Access in Healthcare Settings: Title VI and Beyond,”Journal of General Internal Medicine22, supp. 2 (November 2007): 362–367, available at <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2150609> (last visited November 6, 2013).
54.
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411U.S.1 (1972);
55.
also Plyler v. Doe, 457U.S.202 (1982).
56.
473 U.S. 432 (1985).
57.
See Mills v. Board of Education, 348 F. Supp. 866 (D.D.C. 1972).
SchwartzM. A., “Deaf Patients, Doctors, and the Law: Compelling a Conversation about Communication,”Florida State University Law Review35, no. 4 (2008): 947–1002;.
65.
and for access to “a nursery, elementary, secondary, undergraduate, or postgraduate private school, or other place of education,” see ADA, Title III, § 301.
TeitelbaumJ.Cartwright-SmithL.RosenbaumS., “Translating Rights into Access: Language Access and the Affordable Care Act,”American Journal of Law & Medicine38, nos. 2–3 (2012): 348–373. Quote is from page 372.
United Nations, “The Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities,” available at <http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/dissre00.htm> (last visited November 6, 2013).
RawlsJ., A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971);
95.
see also RawlsJ., The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999): At 115.
96.
RothB., “State Sovereignty, International Legality, and Moral Disagreement,”Panel on ‘Questioning the Aspiration to Global Justice,’ Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (2005): 24, available at <http://www.law.uga.edu/intl/roth.pdf> (last visited November 6, 2013).
WrightQ., The Control of American Foreign Relations (New York: Macmillan, 1922): At 207;.
108.
see also HenkinL.GlennonM.RogersW., Foreign Affairs and the Constitution (Boston: Brill Academic Publishers, 1972): At 156–162;.
109.
and see HenkinL., Foreign Affairs and the United States Constitution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977).
110.
ChayesA.ChayesA. H., The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements 3 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996);
111.
FranckT. M., Fairness in International Law and Institutions (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995);
112.
KohH. H., “Why do Nations Obey International Law?”Yale Law Journal106, no. 8 (1997): 2599–2659;.
113.
GoldsmithJ.PosnerE. A., “The New International Law Scholarship,”Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law (2006), available at <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=901991> (last visited November 6, 2013);
114.
BessonS.TasioulasJ., eds., The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010);
115.
GilmanD., “A Bilingual Approach to Language Rights: How Dialogue between US and International Human Rights Law May Improve the Language Rights Framework,”Harvard Human Rights Journal24, no. 1 (2011: 1–70.
WarrenS. D.BrandeisL. D., “The Right to Privacy,”Harvard Law Review4, no. 5 (1890): 193–220.
118.
381 U.S. 479 (1965).
119.
SearleJ., The Construction of Social Reality (New York: The Free Press, 1995): At 70.
120.
For elaboration, see TrovatoS., “A Stronger Reason for the Right to Sign Languages,”Sign Language Studies13, no. 2 (2013): 401–422;.
121.
and for a bio-ethical, legal slant on this issue, see OulletteA., “Hearing the Deaf: Cochlear Implants, the Deaf Community, and Bioethical Analysis,”Valparaiso University Law Review45, no. 3 (2011): 1244–1268.
122.
For several pointed examples of the need to such advocacy, see SiegelL. M., The Human Right to Language (Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press, 2008).
123.
MooresD., Educating the Deaf: Psychology, Principles, and Practices (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 2001).
As recently argued in KnoorsH.MarscharkM., “Language Planning for the 21st Century: Revisiting Bilingual Language Policy for Deaf Children,”Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education17, no. 3 (2012: 291–305.
126.
See suggestions in Blankmeyer BurkeT.KushalnagarP.MathurG.NapoliD. J.RathmannC.VanGilderK., “The Language Needs of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Infants and Children: Information for Spiritual Leaders and Communities,”Journal of Religion, Disability & Health15, no. 3 (2011: 272–295;.
127.
and see suggestions in Humphries et al., supra note 6.
KrausnekerV.WilcoxS. E.ArmstrongD. F., “Language Policies and the Deaf Community,” in SpolskyB., ed., Cambridge Handbook of Language Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012): At 374–395;.
134.
KrausnekerV., “On the Legal Status of Sign Languages: A Commented Compilation of Resources,”Current Issues of Language Planning10, no. 3 (August 2009): 351–354.
135.
MayS., “Language Rights: The ‘Cinderella’ Human Right,”Journal of Human Rights10, no. 3 (2011): 265–289, at 265;.
136.
and for the benefits of linguistic inclusion, see RodriguezC. M., “Language and Participation,”California Law Review94, no. 3 (May 2006): 687–767.