PfeifferD., “The ICIDH and the Need for Its Revision,”Disability and Society13, no. 4 (1998): 503–523.
3.
HäyryM., “The Moral Contestedness of Selecting ‘Deaf Embryos,’” in KristjanaK.VehmasS.ShakespeareT., eds., Arguing about Disability: Philosophical Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2009): At 154–168.
4.
AmundsonR., “Against Normal Function,”Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Science31, no. 1 (2001): 33–53.
5.
World Health Organization, World Report on Disability, Geneva, 2011.
6.
ShakespeareT.IezzoniL. I.GroceN. E., “The Art of Medicine: Disability and the Training of Health Professionals,”The Lancet374, no. 9704 (2009): 1815–1816.
7.
ShakespeareT., “Still a Health Issue,”Disability and Health Journal5, no. 3 (2012): 129–131.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General, “The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Improve the Health and Wellness of Persons With Disabilities,”Washington, D.C., 2005.
10.
Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation, Fundamental Principles of Disability, London, 1976;.
11.
OliverM., The Politics of Disablement (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990).
CallahanD., “The WHO Definition of ‘Health,’”Studies of the Hastings Center1, no. 3 (1973): 77–88.
14.
BoorseC., “On the Distinction between Disease and Illness,”Philosophy and Public Affairs5, no. 1 (1975): 49–68;.
15.
BoorseC.,. “Wright on Functions,”Philosophical Review85, no. 1 (1976): 70–86;.
16.
BoorseC., “Health as a Theoretical Concept Source,”Philosophy of Science44, no. 4 (1977): 542–573.
17.
NordenfeltL., On the Nature of Health: An Action-Theoretical Approach (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987).
18.
See, e.g., ShakespeareT., Disability Rights and Wrongs (London: Routledge, 2006).
19.
EmersonE., Intellectual and Physical Disability, Social Mobility, Social Inclusion and Health, Center for Disability Research, Lancaster University, UK, 2009.
20.
LollarD. J., “Public Health and Disability: Emerging Opportunities,”Public Health Report117, no. 2 (2002): 131–1362;.
21.
WilberN.MitraM.WalkerD. K.AllenD.MeyersA. R.TupperP., “Disability as a Public Health Issue: Findings and Reflections from the Massachusetts Survey of Secondary Conditions,”Milbank Quarterly80, no. 2 (2002): 393–421;.
22.
KinneS.PatrickD. L.DoyleD. L., “Prevalence of Secondary Conditions among People with Disabilities,”American Journal of Public Health94, no. 3 (2004): 443–445;.
23.
see WHO, supra note 5.
24.
ScotchR. K., From Good Will to Civil Rights: Transforming Federal Disability Policy, 2nd ed. (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1984/2001);
25.
DriedgerD., The Last Civil Rights Movement (London: Hurst, 1989);
26.
BickenbachJ. E., Physical Disability and Social Policy (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993);
27.
BraddockD.ParishS., “An Institutional History of Disability,” in AlbrechtG. L.SeelmanK. D.BuryM., eds., Handbook of Disability Studies (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001): 11–68;.
28.
BickenbachJ. E., Ethics, Law, and Policy, vol. 4 of The SAGE Reference Series on Disability: Key Issues and Future Directions (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2012).
29.
See, e.g., AbberleyP., “The Concept of Oppression and the Development of a Social Theory Disability,”Disability, Handicap and Society2, no. 1 (1987): 5–19;.
30.
MorrisJ., Pride against Prejudice: Transforming Attitudes to Disability (London: The Women's Press, 1991);
31.
HughesB.PatersonK., “The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment,”Disability and Society12, no. 3 (1997): 325–340;.
32.
ShakespeareT.WatsonN., “The Social Model of Disability: An Outmoded Ideology?” in BarnarttS. N.AltmanB. M., Research in Social Science and Disability, vol. 2. (Bingkey, UK: Emerald Group Publishing, 2001): At 9–28;.
33.
See Shakespeare, supra note 14.
34.
See, e.g., Ville, “Self Representations and Physical Impairment: A Social Constructionist Approach,”Sociology of Health & Illness16, no. 3 (1994): 301–321;.
35.
TigheC. A., “Working at Disability: A Qualitative Study of the Meaning of Health and Disability for Women with Physical Impairments,”Disability and Society16, no. 4 (2001): 511–529;.
36.
PutnamM.GeenenS.PowersL., “Health and Wellness: People with Disabilities Discuss Barriers and Facilitators to Well Being,”Journal of Rehabilitation69, no. 1 (2003): 37–45;.
37.
DrumC. E.KrahnG.CulleyC.HammondL., “Recognizing and Responding to the Health Disparities of People with Disabilities,”California Journal of Health Promotion3, no. 3 (2005): 29–42;.
38.
NazliA., “‘I'm Healthy”’: Construction of Health in Disability,”Disability and Health Journal5, no. 4 (2012): 233–240.
39.
NagiS. Z., “Some Conceptual Issues in Disability and Rehabilitation,” in SussmanM. B., ed., Sociology and Rehabilitation, American Sociological Association, Washington, D.C., 1965;
40.
NagiS. Z., Disability and Rehabilitation: Legal, Clinical and Self-Concepts and Measurement (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1969);
41.
NagiS. Z., “The Concept and Measurement of Disability,” in BerkowitzE. D., ed., Disability Policies and Government Programs (New York: Praeger,1979): At 1–15;.
42.
NagiS. Z., “Disability Concepts Revisited: Implications for Prevention,” in PopeA. M.TarlovA. R., eds., Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention (Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine National Academy Press, 1991): At 309–327.
43.
Id. (Pope and Tarlov).
44.
VerbruggeL. M.JetteA. M., “The Disablement Process,”Social Science and Medicine38, no. 1 (1994): 1–14.
45.
WHO, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Geneva, 2001.
46.
PetersF. E., Greek Philosophical Terms: A Historical Lexicon (New York: New York University, 1967).
47.
See, e.g., Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, trans. by RossW. D. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980): At Book 1, 1097b22–1098a20.
48.
See, e.g., ClancyC. M.EisenbergJ. M., “Outcomes Research: Measuring the End Results of Health Care,”Science282 (1998): 245–246;.
49.
PatrickD. L.ChiangY. P., “Measurement of Health Outcomes in Treatment Effectiveness Evaluations: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges,”Medical Care38, sup. II (2000): 14–25.
50.
DrumC. E.Horner-JohnsonW.KrahnG. L., “Self-Rated Health and Healthy Days: Examining the ‘Disability Paradox,’”Disability and Health Journal1, no. 2 (2008): 71–78;.
51.
KrahnG., “Changing Concepts in Health, Wellness and Disability,” in Rehabilitation Research & Training Center: Health and Wellness Consortium, State of the Science Proceedings (Portland, OR: Oregon Health & Science University, 2003);
52.
KrahnG. L.FujiuraG.DrumC. E.CardinalB. J.NosekM. A., “The Dilemma of Measuring Perceived Health Status in the Context of Disability,”Disability and Health Journal2, no. 2 (2009): 49–56.
53.
PatrickD. L.KinneS.EngelbergR. A.PearlmanR. A., “Functional Status and Perceived Quality of Life in Adults with and without Chronic Conditions,”Journal of Clinical Epidemiology53, no. 8 (2000): 779–785;.
54.
see Drum, supra note 19;.
55.
Drum, supra note 26.
56.
McDermottS.TurkM. A.Margaret, “The Myth and Reality of Disability Prevalence: Measuring Disability for Research and Service,”Disability and Health Journal4, no. 1 (2011): 1–5.
57.
See Krahn, supra note 28.
58.
See supra note 24.
59.
See BoorseC., “Disability and Medical Theory,” in RalstonC. D.HoJ., eds., Philosophical Reflections on Disability (New York: Springer, 2010): At 55–90.
60.
See Drum, supra note 26;.
61.
Krahn, supra note 26.
62.
SalomonJ. A.MathersC. D.ChatterjiS.SadanaR.UstunT. B.MurrayC. J. L., “Quantifying Individual Levels of Health: Definitions, Concepts, and Measurement Issues,” in MurrayC. J. L.EvansD. B., eds., Health Systems Performance Assessment: Debates, Methods and Empiricism (Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003): At 301–318.
63.
See Pfeiffer, supra note 1;.
64.
see Amundson, supra note 4;.
65.
SilversA., ‘“Defective” Agents: Equality, Difference and the Tyranny of the Normal,”Journal of Social Philosophy, 25th Anniversary Special Issue (1994): 154–175.
66.
EnglehardtH. T.Jr., The Foundations of Bioethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).
67.
WassermanD., “Philosophical Issues in the Definition and Social Response to Disability,” in AlbrechtG.SeelmanK. D.BuryM., eds., Handbook of Disability Studies (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001): At 219–251.
68.
AschA., “Disability, Bioethics and Human Rights,” in AlbrechtG.SeelmanK. D.BuryM., eds., Handbook of Disability Studies (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001): At 297–326.