This scenario is loosely based on fictional Season 10, Episode 19 ofLaw & Order: Special Victims Unit.
2.
JungkindD., “Re: Tracing Viruses,”email to David Hoke, March 7, 2011 (emphasis added).
3.
CDC NCIRD DVD Inquiry, “FW: ‘FW: Tracking Viruses,’” email to David Hoke, March 14, 2011.
4.
HuntR., “Human Immunodeficiency Virus. Anti-HIV Therapy,”University of South Carolina School of Medicine, available at <http://pathmicro.med.sc.edu/lecture/hiv14a.htm>(last visited June 26, 2012):
5.
ShragS. J.RotaP. A.BelliniW. J.“Spontaneous Mutation Rate of Measles Virus: Direct Estimation Based on Mutations Conferring Monoclonal Antibody Resistance,”Journal of Virology73, no. 1 (1999): 51–54.
6.
JulkunenI.DavidkinI.Oker-BlomC., “Methods for Detecting Anti-Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Virus Antibodies,” in StephensonJ. R.WarnesA., eds., Diagnostic Virology Protocols (Totowa: Humana Press, 1998): At 154.
“Placing a clear level of certainty on this is pretty difficult… I would be making up percentages on this but would say 90–95% certain… assuming there was no one else the infant came into contact with that had measles.” LautenbachE., “Hypothetical Measles Question,” email to David Hoke, April 13, 2011; “I think the epidemiological evidence can build a strong case but I think certainty is not possible. if all of the epidemiological features pointed to the first child infecting the second, then I think the certainty of that is very high (>>95%) given that measles is otherwise such a rare infection in the US currently.”.
10.
MetlayJ., “Hypothetical Measles Epi Question,” email to David Hoke, April 13, 2011.
11.
It should be noted, further, that Mr. and Mrs. P might likewise pursue a claim for the negligent infliction of emotional distress, due to the personal suffering they would experience in losing their child. While such an action is certainly a viable option, it has no direct bearing on our argument that liability ought to be applied where harm has resulted from claiming a philosophical objection to vaccination.
12.
TeretS. P.VernickJ. S., “Gambling with the Health of Others,”Michigan Law Revie First Impressions107, no. 110 (2009): 110–113, at 111.
13.
John B. v. Superior Ct., 45 Cal. Rptr. 3d 316, 324, 137 P.3d 153, 159 (2006);