LauD.OgboguU., “Stem Cell Clinics Online: The Direct-to-Consumer Portrayal of Stem Cell Medicine,”Cell Stem Cell3, no. 6 (2008): 591–594; RegenbergA. C.HutchinsonL. A., “Medicine on the Fringe: Stem Cell-Based Interventions in Advance of Evidence,”Stem Cells27, no. 9 (2009): 2312–2319.
2.
EnserinkM.ArticleNews, “Selling the Stem Cell Dream,”Science313, no. 5784 (2006): 160–163.
3.
See Lau, supra note 1; Regenberg, supra note 1.
4.
Nature, Editorial, “Order from Chaos,”Nature466, no. 7302 (2010): 7–8.
5.
See Lau, supra note 1.
6.
See Regenberg, supra note 1.
7.
RyanK. A.SandersA. N., “Tracking the Rise of Stem Cell Tourism,”Regenerative Medicine5, no. 1 (2010): 27–33.
8.
See, e.g., ZaremboA., “A Desperate Injection of Stem Cells and Hope,”Los Angeles Times, February 20, 2005. See also LedfordH., “Stem-Cell Scientists Grapple with Clinics,”Nature474, no. 7353 (2011): 550 for a discussion of an important exception, stem cell clinics which claim their treatment methodologies are not subject to FDA oversight.
9.
See Regenberg, supra note 1.
10.
See Lau, supra note 1; Regenberg, supra note 1.
11.
SippD., “Stem Cell Stratagems in Alternative Medicine,”Regenerative Medicine6, no. 3 (2011): 407–414.
12.
See Regenberg, supra note 1; see Ryan, supra note 7.
13.
Id. (Ryan).
14.
See Ryan, supra note 7.
15.
HyunI.LindvallO., “New ISSCR Guidelines Underscore Major Principles for Responsible Translational Stem Cell Research,”Cell Stem Cell3, no. 6 (2008): 607–609; NelsonB., “Stem Cell Researchers Face Down Stem Cell Tourism,”Nature Reports Stem Cells (2008), available at <http://www.nature.com/stemcells/2008/0806/080605/full/stemcells.2008.89.html> (last visited January 23, 2012).
16.
AmariglioN.HirshbergA., “Donor-Derived Brain Tumor Following Neural Stem Cell Transplantation in an Ataxia telangiectasia Patient,”PLoS Medicine6, no. 2 (2009): E1000029.
17.
ThirabanjasakD.TantiwongseK., “Angiomyeloproliferative Lesions Following Autologous Stem Cell Therapy,”Journal of the American Society of Nephrology21, no. 7 (2010): 1218–1222.
FurrowB.GreaneyT., Health Law (St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co., 1995): At § 6–1.
31.
Id.
32.
See, e.g., Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1972).
33.
Schloendorf v. Society of New York Hospital, 211, N.Y. 125, 105 N.E. 92 (1914).
34.
See, e.g., Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1972).
35.
See Furrow, supra note 30, at § 6–9.
36.
92 Cal. App. 4th 692 (2001).
37.
92 Cal. App. 4th at 697. Several of the legal charges were resolved in the physician's favor, but only after the Schiff's daughter had been treated. Id., at 698–699. The father also acknowledged that he was aware that the American Medical Association and the American Cancer Society were critical of the Texas physician, who was considered a “fraud” by many, and his experimental treatment. Id., at 697–699.
38.
Schiff v. Prados, 92 Cal.App. 4th at 700.
39.
Schiff v. Prados, 92 Cal.App. 4th at 702, citing Cobbs v. Grant, 8 Cal. 3d 229, 245 (1972).
40.
Schiff v. Prados, 92 Cal. App. 4th at 701, citing Vandi v. Permanente Medical Group Inc., 7 Cal.App.4th 1064, 1071 (1992).
41.
Schiff v. Prados, 92 Cal. App. 4th at 707, citing Spencer By and Through Spencer v. Seikel, 742 P.2d 1126 (1987).
42.
VinclerL. A.NicolM. F., “When Ignorance Isn't Bliss: What Healthcare Practitioners and Facilities Should Know about Complementary and Alternative Medicine,”Journal of Health and Hospital Law30, no. 3 (1997): 160–178, discussing physician obligations with respect to patient inquiries regarding complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). They suggest that physicians in an ongoing relationship have an obligation to inquire regarding CAM usage and provide information about the risks and benefits of the particular CAM in use. They suggest physicians have a minimum obligation to obtain and share information regarding basic efficacy and safety of the CAM in use, although they also indicate that obligation may be limited to the “reasonable efforts of a similarly trained practitioner.”
LantosJ.MatlockA. M.WendlerD., “Clinician Integrity and Limits to Patient Autonomy,”JAMA305, no. 5 (2011): 495–499, at 497–498.
45.
MartinA. W., “Legal Malpractice: Negligent Referral as a Cause of Action,”Cumberland Law Review29, no. 3 (1999): 679–703, at 682–684 (discussing the negligent referral cause of action and emphasizing the “duty of the referring physician to use reasonable care in making the recommendation”).
46.
See VinclerNicol, supra note 42; Lantos, supra note 44.
47.
See Lantos, supra note 44.
48.
Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. Cir. 2007) cert. denied 552 U.S. 1159 (2008).
49.
See Lantos, supra note 44.
50.
See VinclerNicol, supra note 42.
51.
WolfL. E.LoB., “When Parents Reject Interventions to Reduce Postnatal Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission,”Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine155, no. 8 (2001): 927–933, at 928; ZarzecznyA.CaulfieldT., “Stem Cell Tourism and Doctors Duties to Minors – A View from Canada,”American Journal of Bioethics10, no. 5 (2010): 3–15, at 6.
52.
See WolfLo, supra note 51 and Zarzeczny, supra note 51.
53.
Id. (Wolf and Lo).
54.
Id.
55.
Id.
56.
See ZarzecznyCaulfield, supra note 51.
57.
N. Kellogg and American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Abuse and Neglect, “The Evaluation of Sexual Abuse in Children,”Pediatrics116, no. 2 (2005): 506–512, at 511.
58.
See, e.g., NY Penal §265.25. See id. (Kellogg and American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Abuse and Neglect), supra note 57.
59.
See, e.g., Fla. Stat. Ann. §39.201.
60.
See ZarzecznyCaulfield, supra note 51 (reaching similar conclusions under Canadian law).
61.
See Ryan, supra note 7.
62.
MurdochC. E.ScottC. T., “Stem Cell Tourism and the Power of Hope,”American Journal of Bioethics10, no. 5 (2010): 16–23.
63.
See, for instance, H-480.964 Alternative Medicine, which outlines the AMA policy on alternative medicine highlighting the lack of safety of efficacy information on most alternative therapies and calling for such studies and for physicians to routinely inquire into their patients' use of such alternative therapies and educate both themselves and their patients about the state of scientific knowledge on these options. In addition, see D-480.981 Increasing Awareness of the Benefits and Risks Associated with Complementary and Alternative Medicine, calling on the AMA the “promote awareness among medical students and physicians of the wide use of complementary or alternative medicine, including its benefits, risks, and evidence of efficacy or lack thereof.”