WolfS., “Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations,”Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics36, no. 2 (2008): 219–248, at 219.
2.
VernooijM. W., “Incidental Findings in Brain MRI in the General Population,”New England Journal of Medicine357, no. 18 (2007): 1821–1828; KumraS., “Ethical and Practical Considerations in the Management of Incidental Findings in Pediatric MRI Studies,”Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry45, no. 8 (2006): 1000–1006; IllesJ., “Ethical Consideration of Incidental Findings on Adult Brain MRI in Research,”Neurology62, no. 6 (2004): 888–890; WeberF.KnopfH., “Incidental Findings in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brains of Healthy Young Men,”Journal of Neurological Sciences240, no. 1 (2006): 81–84.
3.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, The Belmont Report, U.S. Government Printing OfficeWashington, D.C., 1979.
4.
EmanuelE.WendlerD., and GradyC., “What Makes Clinical Research Ethical?”Journal of the American Medical Association283, no. 20 (2000): 2701–2711, at 2701.
5.
Id.
6.
FriedC., Medical Experimentation: Personal Integrity and Social Policy (Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 1974).
7.
Id., at 47.
8.
WeijerC.MillerP. B., “Therapeutic Obligation in Clinical Research,”The Hastings Center Report33, no. 3 (2003): 3–4; ColemanC. H., “Duties to Subjects in Clinical Research,”Vanderbilt Law Review58, no. 2 (2005): 387–449; FreedmanB.GlassK. C., and WeijerC., “Placebo Orthodoxy in Clinical Research. II: Ethical, Legal and Regulatory Myths,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics24, no. 3 (2007): 252–259, at 253.
9.
MorreimH., “The Clinical Investigator as Fiduciary: Discarding a Misguided Idea,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics33, no. 3 (2005): 586–598.
10.
IllesJ., “Practical Approaches to Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging Research,”Neurology70, no. 5 (2008): 384–390; BeauchampT.ChildressJ., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001): At 173–176.
11.
MillerF. G.MelloM. M., and JoffeS., “Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: What do Investigators Owe Participants?”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics36, no. 2 (2008): 271–279.
12.
RichardsonBelsky also recognize that all moral agents, not just clinicians or researchers, have the duty to rescue those in need, at least when one can provide the help without serious sacrifice or risk. For a philosophically compelling defense of a duty to rescue, see ScanlonT. M., What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998). RichardsonBelsky's ancillary care duties are those that lie beyond these general duties to rescue and are specially incumbent on human subject researchers. RichardsonH. S.BelskyL., “Medical Researchers' Ancillary Clinical Care Responsibilities,”BMJ328, no. 7454 (2004): 1494–1496. RichardsonH. S.BelskyL., “The Ancillary Care Responsibilities of Medical Researchers: An Ethical Framework for Thinking about the Clinical Care That Researchers Owe Their Subjects,””Hastings Center Report34, no. 1 (2004): 25–33.
13.
Id. (RichardsonBelsky, “Medical Researchers' Ancillary Clinical Care Responsibilities”), at 26.
14.
As will be addressed later in the paper, I distinguish between anticipated and unanticipated IFs. Ancillary care will only create obligations for unanticipated IFs, while other research ethics standards will govern anticipated IFs.
15.
See RichardsonBelsky, “Medical Researchers' Ancillary Clinical Care Responsibilities,” supra note 12, at 27.
16.
Id., at 30.
17.
Id.
18.
See WeijerMiller, supra note 8.
19.
See Emanuel, supra note 4.
20.
Id.; MillerF. G.BrodyH., “A Critique of Clinical Equipoise: Therapeutic Misconception in the Ethics of Clinical Trials,”Hastings Center Report33, no. 3 (2003): 19–28, at 26.
21.
RichardsonH. S., “Incidental Findings and Ancillary Care Obligations,”Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics36, no. 2 (2008): 256–270, at 259.
22.
RoyalJ. M.PetersonB. S., “The Risks and Benefits of Searching for Incidental Findings in MRI Research Scans,”Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics36, no. 2 (2008): 305–314, at 306.
23.
KatzmanG.DagherA. P., and PatronasN. J., “Incidental Findings on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging from 1000 Asymptomatic Volunteers,”JAMA282, no. 1 (1999): 36–39, at 36.
24.
IllesJ.DesmondJ. E.HuangL. F.RaffinT. A., and AtlasS. W., “Ethical and Practical Considerations in Managing Incidental Findings in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging,”Brain and Cognition50, no. 3 (2002): 358–365; KimB. S.IllesJ.KaplanR. T.ReissA., and AtlasS. W., “Neurologic Findings on Brain Magnetic Imaging from 1000 Asymptomatic Volunteers,”JAMA282, no. 1 (2002): 36–39; see Katzman, supra note 23; IllesJ.KimB. S.KaplanR. T.ReissA., and AtlasS. W., “Neurologic Findings in Healthy Children on Pediatric fMRI: Incidence and Significance,”International Society for Magnetic Resonance Imaging23, no. 1 (2002): 1–4.
25.
IllesJ.ChinV. N., “Bridging Philosophical and Practical Implications of Incidental Findings in Brain Research,”Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics36, no. 2 (2008): 298–304, at 303.
26.
See Wolf, supra note 1; NIH Conference Proceedings, Detection and Disclosure of Incidental Findings in Neuroimaging Research, 2005; see RoyalPeterson, supra note 22.
27.
ParkerL., “The Future of Incidental Findings: Should They Be Viewed as Benefits?”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics36, no. 2 (2008): 341–351.
28.
KingN. M. P., “Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical Trials,”Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics28, no. 4 (2000): 332–343, at 338.