National Institutes of Health, National Human Genome Research Institute, “All About the Human Genome Project,”available at <http://www.genome.gov/l0001772> (last visited March 12, 2009).
2.
Genetics and Public Policy Center, “Genetic Testing Quality Initiative,”available at <http://www.dnapolicy.org> (last visited April 9, 2009); JavittG. H.HudsonK., “Federal Neglect: Regulation of Genetic Testing,”Issues in Sciences and Technology27, no. 3 (2006): 59–66, at 59.
3.
Genetics and Public Policy Center, “Publication Announcement: Comparison of State Laws for Direct-to-Consumer Testing,”available at <http://www.dnapolicy.org> (last visited April 9, 2009).
Genetics and Public Policy Center, “Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies,”available at <http://www.dnapolicy.org> (last visited April 9, 2009).
AllianceGenetic, “Promotion of Genetic Testing Services Directly to Consumers,”available at <http://www.geneticalliance.org> (last visited April 9, 2009).
8.
McGuireA. L.DiazC. M.WangT.HilsenbeckS. G., “Social Networkers' Attitudes toward Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing,”American Journal of Bioethics (forthcoming July 2009).
9.
HallM. A.McEwenJ. E.BartonJ. C.WalkerA. P., “Concerns in a Primary Care Population About Genetic Discrimination by Insurers,”General Medicine7, no. 5 (2005): 311–316.
10.
H.R. 493, Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act of 2008, available at <http://www.genome.gov/24519851> (last visited March 12, 2009).
HunterD. J.KhouryM. J.DrazenJ. M., “Letting the Genome Out of the Bottle: Will We Get Our Wish?”New England Journal of Medicine358, no. 2 (2008): 105–107.
18.
American College of Medical Genetics, “ACMG Statement on Direct-To-Consumer Testing,”available at <http://www.geneticsinmedicine.org> (last visited April 9, 2009).
Medical News Today, “American Medical Association Adopts New Direct-To-Consumer Policy Recommendations,” August 14, 2008, available at <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/118231.php> (last visited on April 9, 2009).
24.
Certain web sites provide a listing of the various state laws that define the practice of medicine. See American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, “Definition of the Practice of Medicine: A State-by-State Survey,”available at <https://www.aapl.org/state_law_prac_med.htm (last visited April 9, 2009).
25.
For instance, the statutes regulating the practice of medicine in the States of California, Florida, Illinois, New York, and Texas contain a combination of these words.
26.
Hurley v. People, 63 P.2d 1227, 1229–1230 (Colo. 1936); Underwood v. Scott, 23 P. 942, 943 (Kan. 1890).
27.
Hurley, 63 P.2d at 1229.
28.
Curley v. State, 16 So.2d 440, 440–41 (Fla. 1944).
29.
See, e.g., Hernon v. EG Corrigan Constr. Co., 595 N.E.2d 561, 562 (Ill. 1992).
30.
Webster's New International Dictionary (3d ed.1993): 622; see also Curley, supra note 27.
31.
NunnallyA. C., “Commercialized Genetic Testing: The Role of Corporate Biotechnology in the New Genetic Age,”Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law8, no. 1 (2002): 306–346, at 326.
32.
HanJ., “The Optimal Scope of FDA Regulation of Genetic Tests: Meeting Challenges and Keeping Promises,”Harvard Journal of Law & Technology20, no. 2 (2007): 423–441, at 434.
33.
See Nunnally, supra note 31.
34.
United States Government Accountability Office, Nutrigenetic Testing: Tests Purchased from Four Web Sites Mislead Consumers, July 27, 2006, available at <http://www.gao.gov> (lasted visited April 9, 2009).
CohenM. H., “Healing at the Borderland of Medicine and Religion: Regulating Potential Abuse or Authority by Spiritual Healers,”Journal of Law and Religion18, no. 2 (2002): 373–426, at 409.
39.
McGuireA. L.BurkeW., “An Unwelcome Side Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing: Raiding the Medical Commons,”JAMA300, no. 22 (2008): 2669–2671.
40.
See 42 C.F.R. Part 493 (2008).
41.
Report of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society, U.S. System of Oversight of Genetic Testing: A Response to the Charge of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, April 2008, available at <http://www4.od.nih.gov/oba/sacghs/reports/SACGHS_oversight_report.pdf. (last visited April 9, 2009).
ABIM, ACP-ASIM Foundation, European Federation of Internal Medicine, “Medical Professionalism in the New Millenium: A Physician Charter,”Journal of the American College of Surgeons196, no. 1 (2003):115–18.
45.
See generally Bovara v. St. Francis Hosp., 700 N.E.2d 143 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998); Corbet v. McKinney, 980 S.W.2d 166 (Mo. 1998); Irvin v. Smith, 31 P.3d 934 (Kan. 2001); Kelley v. Middle Tennessee Emergency Physicians, 133 S.W.3d 587 (Tenn. 2004); Lownesbury v. Van Buren, 762 N.E.2d 354 (Ohio 2002); Raptis-Smith v. St. Joseph's Medical Ctr., 755 N.Y.S.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003); Sterling v. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 802 A.2d 440 (Md. 2002); St. John v. Pope, 901 S.W.2d 420 (Tex. 1995); Walters v. Rinker, 520 N.E.2d 468 (Ind. 1988).
46.
See generally Bovara, 700 N.E.2d at 143; Corbet, 980 S.W.2d at 166; Irvin, 31 P.3d at 934; Kelley, 133 S.W.3d at 587; Lownesbury, 762 N.E.2d at 354; Sterling, 802 A.2d at 440; St. John, 901 S.W.2d at 420; Walters, 520 N.E.2d at 468.
47.
See Walters, 520 N.E.2d at 472.
48.
Id. at 472; see also Dougherty v. Gifford, 826 S.W.2d 668, 675 (Tex. App. – Texarkana 1992, no writ).
49.
St. John, 901 S.W.2d at 424.
50.
Dougherty, 826 S.W.2d at 675 (concerning a pathologist); Peterson v. St. Cloud Hosp., 460 N.W.2d 635 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990) (concerning a pathologist); Phillips v. Good Samaritan Hosp., 416 N.E.2d 646 (Ohio 1979) (concerning a radiologist); Raptis-Smith, 755 N.Y.S.2d at 386 (concerning a radiologist); Walters, 520 N.E.2d at 468 (concerning a pathologist).
51.
GrosseS. D.KhouryM., “What is the Clinical Utility of Genetic Testing?”Genetics in Medicine8, no. 7 (2006): 448–450, at 448.
52.
Id., at 448.
53.
See Report of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society, supra note 41.
54.
Id.
55.
Id.
56.
See McGuire, supra note 39, at 2669–2670; see also id.