WaldN., “Use of Personal Medical Records for Research Purposes,”BMJ309, no. 6966 (1994): 1422–1424; SimonG. E., “Large Medical Databases, Population-Based Research, and Patient Confidentiality,”American Journal of Psychiatry157, no. 11 (2000): 1731–1737.
2.
BlackN., “Secondary Use of Personal Data for Health and Health Services Research: Why Identifiable Data Are Essential,”Journal of Health Services Research & Policy8, Supplement 1 (2003): 36–40.
3.
WoolfS. H., “Selection Bias from Requiring Patients to Give Consent to Examine Data for Health Services Research,”Archives of Family Medicine9, no. 9 (2000): 1111–1118; TuJ. V., “Impracticability of Informed Consent in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network,”New England Journal of Medicine350, no. 14 (2004): 1414–1421; BuckleyB., “Selection Bias Resulting from the Requirement for Prior Consent in Observational Research: A Community Cohort of People with Ischaemic Heart Disease,”Heart93, no. 10 (2007): 1116–1120.
4.
Protection of Human Subjects, Department of Health and Human Services, Code of Federal Regulations (1991), 45 C. F.R. 46.102 (f).
The United National International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966, at Article 7, available at <www.hrweb.org/legal/cpr.html> (last visited June 3, 2008).
7.
BeauchampT. L.ChildressJ. F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001): at 297.
8.
GostinL. O.HodgeJ. G.Jr., “Personal Privacy and Common Goods: A Framework for Balancing under the National Health Information Privacy Rule,”Minnesota Law Review86, no. 6 (2002): 1439–79, at 1454.
9.
Id., at 1455.
10.
Id., at 1441.
11.
FeinbergJ., Harm to Self (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986): At 54–55.
12.
Protection of Human Subjects, Department of Health and Human Services, Code of Federal Regulations (1991), 45 C. F. R. 46.116 (d) (2).
13.
StarrP., “Health and the Right to Privacy,”American Journal of Law & Medicine25, nos. 2 and 3 (1999): 193–201, at 200.
14.
Id., at 201.
15.
RawlsJ., A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999): at 96.
16.
HarrisJ., “Scientific Research Is a Moral Duty,”Journal of Medical Ethics31, no. 4 (2005): 242–248.
17.
MillJ. S., “On Liberty,” in Utilitarianism, Liberty and Representative Government (London: J. M. Dent, 1971): at 74.
18.
CapronA. M., “Protection of Research Subjects: Do Special Rules Apply in Epidemiology?”Journal of Clinical Epidemiology44, Supplement 1 (1991): 81S–89S, at 87S.
19.
LowranceW., “Learning From Experience: Privacy and the Secondary Use of Data in Health Research,”Journal of Health Services Research & Policy8, Supplement 1 (2003): 2–7.
20.
MillerF. G.WertheimerA., “Facing up to Paternalism in Research Ethics,”Hastings Center Report37, no. 3 (2007): 24–34.
21.
GostinL. O., “National Health Information Privacy: Regulations under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act,”JAMA285, no. 23 (2001): 3015–3021.
22.
KassN. E., “The use of Medical Records in Research: What Do Patients Want?”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics31, no. 3 (2003): 429–433; WillisonD. J., “Patient Consent Preferences for Research Uses of Information and Electronic Medical Records: Interview and Survey Data,”BMJ326, no. 7385 (2003): 373–337; RoblingM. R., “Public Attitudes towards the Use of Primary Care Patient Record Data in Medical Research without Consent: A Qualitative Study,”Journal of Medical Ethics30, no. 1 (2004): 104–109; and DamschroderL. J., “Patients, Privacy, and Trust: Patients' Willingness to Allow Researchers to Access Their Medical Records,”Social Science and Medicine64, no. 1 (2007): 223–235.
23.
MillerF. G.WendlerD., “The Relevance of Empirical Research in Bioethics,”Schizophrenia Bulletin32, no. 1 (2006): 37–41.