MenikoffJ.RichardsE. P., What the Doctor Didn't Say: The Hidden Truth about Medical Research (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006): At 15–16.
2.
Id., at 16.
3.
Id., at 49.
4.
Id., at 38.
5.
See TruogR. D., “Is Informed Consent Always Necessary for Randomized, Controlled Trials?”New England Journal of Medicine340, no. 10 (1999): 448–450; LantosJ., “The ‘Inclusion Benefit’ in Clinical Trials,”Journal of Pediatrics134, no. 2 (1999): 130–131.
6.
AppelbaumP.RothL. H.LidzC. W., “The Therapeutic Misconception: Informed Consent in Psychiatric Research,”International Journal of Law and Psychiatry5, nos. 3–4 (1982): 319–329; AppelbaumP.RothL. H.LidzC. W.BensonP.WinsladeW., “False Hopes and Best Data: Consent to Research and the Therapeutic Misconception,”Hastings Center Report17, no. 2 (1987): 20–24; DresserR., “The Ubiquity and Utility of the Therapeutic Misconception,”Social Philosophy and Policy19, no. 2 (2002): 271–294; DaughertyC., “Quantitative Analysis of Ethical Issues in Phase I Trials: A Survey Interview Study of 144 Advanced Cancer Patients,”IRB22, no. 3 (2000): 6–14.
7.
DaughertyC., “Perceptions of Cancer Patients and Their Physicians Involved in Phase I Trials,”Journal of Clinical Oncology13, no. 5 (1995): 1062–1072; id. (Dresser); RaysonD., “Lisa's Stories,”JAMA282, no. 17 (1999): 1605–1606; BambergM.BudwigN., “Therapeutic Misconceptions: When the Voices of Caring and Research Are Misconstrued as the Voice of Curing,”Ethics and Behavior2, no. 3 (1992): 165–184; MillerM.“Phase I Cancer Trials: A Collusion of Misunderstanding,”Hastings Center Report30, no. 4 (2000): 34–43.
8.
MorreimH. E., “Litigation in Clinical Research: Malpractice Doctrines Versus Research Realities,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics32, no. 3 (2004): 474–484; MorreimH. E., “The Clinical Investigator as Fiduciary: Discarding a Misguided Idea,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics33, no. 3 (2005): 586–598; see, for example, Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute, Inc., 264 F. Supp. 2d 1064 (S.D. Fla. 2003); Kernke v. Menninger Clinic, Inc., 172 F. Supp. 2ds 1347 (D. Kan. 2001).
9.
Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, 366 Md. 29, 782 A.2d 897 (2001).
10.
Institute of Medicine (IOM), Ethical Considerations for Research on Housing-Related Health Hazards Involving Children, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 2005.
11.
See Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, supra note 9, at 103.
12.
Abney v. Amgen, Inc. 443F.3d 540 (6th Cir. 2006).
13.
MelloM.JoffeS., “Compact versus Contract — Industry Sponsors' Obligations to Their Research Subjects,”New England Journal of Medicine356, no. 26 (2007): 2737–2743, at 2738.
14.
See Abney v. Amgen, supra note 12; id.
15.
See, for example, Ande v. Rock, 647 N.W. 2d 265 (2002); Spenceley v. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 938 F.Supp. 398, (S.D. Tex. 1996).
16.
See, for example, BennerP., “Living Organ Donors: Respecting the Risks Involved in the ‘Gift of Life,’”American Journal of Critical Care11, no. 3 (2002): 266–268; RossL. F., “Donating a Second Kidney: A Tale of Family and Ethics,”Seminars in Dialysis13, no. 3 (2000): 201–203.
17.
See Morreim, supra note 8; MillerF. G.RosensteinD. L., “The Therapeutic Orientation to Clinical Trials,”New England Journal of Medicine348, no. 14 (2003): 1383–1386.