CampbellE. G., “Data Withholding in Academic Genetics: Evidence from a National Survey,”JAMA287, no. 4 (2002): 473–480.
2.
National Institutes of Health, Request for Information (RFI): Proposed Policy for Sharing of Data Obtained in NIH Supported or Conducted Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS), 2006, available at <http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/N0T-0D-06-094.html> (last visited February 12, 2008).
3.
NIH Pharmacogenetics Research Network, “Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base,”2007, available at <http://www.nigms.nih.gov/Initiatives/PGRN/> (last visited February 12, 2008).
4.
PulleyJ. M., “Attitudes and Perceptions of Patients towards Methods of Establishing a DNA Biobank,”Cell & Tissue Banking8, no. 3 (2007): 233–241.
5.
National Action Plan for Breast Cancer, “Consent Form for Use of Tissue for Research,”1997, available at <www.4woman.gov/napbc/catalog.wci/napbc/consent.htm> (last visited February 12, 2008); National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance, vol. 1, Rockville, MD, 1999.
6.
BeskowL. M., “Informed Consent for Population-Based Research Involving Genetics,”JAMA286, no. 18 (2001): 2315–2321.
7.
WeirR. F.HortonJ. R., “DNA Banking and Informed Consent: Part 1,”IRB17, no. 4 (1995): 1–4.
8.
Office for Human Research Protections, Department of Health and Human Services, Guidance on Research Involving Coded Private Information or Biological Specimens, 2004, available at <http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/cdebiol.pdf> (last visited February 12, 2008).
9.
Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, “Genome-Wide Association Study of 14,000 Cases of Seven Common Diseases and 3,000 Shared Controls,”Nature447, no. 7145 (2007): 661–678.
10.
FullerB. P., “Privacy in Genetics Research,”Science285, no. 5432 (1999): 1359–1361.
11.
PullmanD.HodgkinsonK., “Genetic Knowledge and Moral Responsibility: Ambiguity at the Interface of Genetic Research and Clinical Practice,”Clinical Genetics69, no. 3 (2006): 199–203.
12.
PeliasM. K., “Research in Human Genetics: The Tension between Doing No Harm and Personal Autonomy,”Clinical Genetics67, no. 1 (2005): 1–5.
13.
ShalowitzD. I.MillerF. G., “Disclosing Individual Results of Clinical Research: Implications of Respect for Participants,”JAMA294, no. 6 (2005): 737–740.
14.
KohaneI. S., “Reestablishing the Researcher-Patient Compact,”Science316, no. 5826 (2007): 836–837.
15.
AlexanderD.van DyckP. C., “A Vision of the Future of Newborn Screening,”Pediatrics117, no. 5 (2006): S350–S354; PollittR. J., “Introducing New Screens: Why Are We All Doing Different Things?”Journal of Inherited and Metabolic Diseases30, no. 4 (2007): 423–429.
16.
AndersonK. G., “How Well Does Paternity Confidence Match Actual Paternity? Evidence from Worldwide Nonpaternity Rates,”Current Anthropology47, no. 3 (2006): 513–520.
17.
WertzD. C.FletcherJ. C., “Ethics and Medical Genetics in the United States: A National Survey,”American Journal of Medical Genetics29, no. 4 (1988): 815–827.
18.
RossL. F., “Disclosing Misattributed Paternity,”Bioethics10, no. 2 (1996): 114–130; TurneyL., “The Incidental Discovery of Nonpaternity through Genetic Carrier Screening: An Exploration of Lay Attitudes,”Qualitative Health Research15, no. 5 (2005): 620–634.
19.
WertzD. C.FletcherJ. C.BergK., Review of Ethical Issues in Medical Genetics, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2003.
20.
DeCampM.SugarmanJ., “Ethics in Population-Based Genetic Research,”Accountability in Research11, no. 1 (2004): 1–26.
21.
TaitA. R.Voepel-LewisT.MalviyaS., “Do They Understand? (Part I): Parental Consent for Children Participating in Clinical Anesthesia and Surgery Research,”Anesthesiology98, no. 3 (2003): 603–608; TurnerP.WilliamsC., “Informed Consent: Patients Listen and Read, but What Information Do They Retain?”New Zealand Medical Journal115, no. 1164 (2002): U218; PesudovsK.LuscombeC. K.CosterD. J., “Recall from Informed Consent Counseling for Cataract Surgery,”Journal of Law & Medicine13, no. 4 (2006): 496–504.
22.
WachbroitR., “The Question Not Asked: The Challenge of Pleiotropic Genetic Tests,”Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal8, no. 2 (1998): 131–144.
23.
RobertsJ. S., “Who Seeks Genetic Susceptibility Testing for Alzheimer's Disease? Findings from a Multisite, Randomized Clinical Trial,”Genetics in Medicine6, no. 4 (2004): 197–203; CheckE., “Celebrity Genomes Alarm Researchers,”Nature447, no. 7143 (2007): 358–359.
ScheunerM. T., “Genetic Evaluation for Coronary Artery Disease,”Genetics in Medicine5, no. 4 (2003): 269–285.
26.
ClaytonE. W., “Informed Consent for Genetic Research on Stored Tissue Samples,”JAMA274, no. 22 (1995): 1786–1792.
27.
See National Bioethics Advisory Commission, supra note 5.
28.
AndrewsL. B., eds., Committee on Assessing Genetic Risks, Division of Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine, Assessing Genetic Risks: Implications for Health and Social Policy (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1994).
29.
42 U.S.C. § 263a (2007).
30.
BookmanE. B., “Reporting Genetic Results in Research Studies: Summary and Recommendations of an NHLBI Working Group,”American Journal of Medical Genetics140A, no. 10 (2006): 1033–1040; National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, NHLBI Working Group on Reporting Genetic Results in Research Studies, Meeting Summary, 2004, available at <http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/meetings/workshops/gene-results.htm> (last visited February 12, 2008).
31.
BieseckerB. B., “Psychosocial Factors Predicting BRCA1/BRCA2 Testing Decisions in Members of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Families,”American Journal of Medical Genetics93, no. 4 (2000): 257–263; FosterC., “Non-Uptake of Predictive Genetic Testing for BRCA1/2 Among Relatives of Known Carriers: Attributes, Cancer Worry, and Barriers to Testing in a Multicenter Clinical Cohort,”Genetic Testing8, no. 1 (2004): 23–29; see Roberts, supra note 23; QuaidK. A.MorrisM., “Reluctance to Undergo Predictive Testing: The Case of Huntington Disease,”American Journal of Medical Genetics45, no. 1 (1993): 41–45; HaydenM. R., “Predictive Testing for Huntington's Disease: The Calm After the Storm,”The Lancet356, no. 9246 (2000): 1944–1945.