Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20117 (2d Cir. Aug. 3, 2006 ).
2.Id.
3.Id. , at *6.
4.Id.
5.Id.
6.Id.
7.Id.
8.Id.
9.Id.
10.Id.
11.Id.
12.Id.
13.Id.
14.Id.
15.Id.
16.Id .
17.Id.
18.Id.
19.Id.
20.Id. , at *8.
21.Id.
22.Id.
23.Id.
24.Id .
25.Id .
26.Id .
27.Id.
28.Id.
29.Id.
30.Id. , at *9.
31.Id.
32.Id .
33.Id.
34.Id. , at *10.
35.Id.
36.Id.
37.Id .
38.Id.
39.White v. Napoleon , 897 F.2d 103, 113 (3d Cir. 1990 ) (holding that prisoners “retain a limited right to refuse treatment and a related right to be informed of the proposed treatment and viable alternatives”).
40.Benson v. Terhune , 304 F.3d 874, 884–885 (9th Cir. 2002 ).