The category of “people with HIV” includes people diagnosed with AIDS as well as those who are asymptomatic. In the present article, I generally frame the discussion in terms of people with HIV The exception is in my discussion of some public opinion data and some specific incidents that refer specifically to people with AIDS.
3.
HerekG.M., “Illness, Stigma, and AIDS,” in CostaE.T.Jr., and VandenBosG.R., eds., Psychological Aspects of Serious Illness: Chronic Conditions, Fatal Diseases, and Clinical Care (Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1990): 107–50; HerekG.M. and GluntE.K., “An Epidemic of Stigma: Public Reactions to AIDS,”American Psychologist, 43 (1988): 886–91; ChesneyM.A. and SmithA.W., “Critical Delays in HIV Testing and Care: The Potential Role of Stigma,”American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1162–74.
4.
My discussion provides only a brief and somewhat idiosyncratic introduction to social psychological thinking about stigma and HIV Readers who desire additional information about stigma in general will find the following sources helpful: GoffmanE., Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1963); CrockerJ.MajorB., and SteeleC., “Social Stigma,” in GilbertD.T.FiskeS.T., and LindzeyG., eds., The Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 2, 4th ed. (Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1998): 504–53; JonesE.E., Social Stigma: The Psychology of Marked Relationships (New York: W.H. Freeman, 1984); LinkB.G. and PhelanJ.C., “Conceptualizing Stigma,”Annual Review of Sociology, 27 (2001): 363–85. For more detailed discussions of HIV-related stigma, see the papers in HerekG.M., ed., “AIDS and Stigma,” a thematic issue ofAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 42, no. 7 (1999).
5.
The source for my comments about the etymology of stigma is the Oxford English Dictionary (1971 edition).
6.
Oxford English Dictionary (1971): at 954.
7.
Id.
8.
Goffman, supra note 4.
9.
DuckittJ.H., The Social Psychology of Prejudice (New York: Praeger, 1992): at 7–24.
10.
Id. at 9.
11.
AjzenI. and FishbeinM., Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1980); EaglyA.H. and ChaikenS., eds., The Psychology of Attitudes (Fort Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1993); AjzenI., “Nature and Operation of Attitudes,”Annual Review of Psychology, 52 (2001): 27–58; FishbeinM. and AjzenI., Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior (Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1975).
12.
Eagly and Chaiken, supra note 11; Ajzen and Fishbein, supra note 11.
13.
Ajzen and Fishbein, supra note 11; HeiderF., The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1958).
14.
ScamblerG., Epilepsy (London: Routledge, 1989): at 56–57. I am grateful to Scott Burris for making me aware of Scambler's work.
15.
HerekG.M., “AIDS and Stigma: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda,”AIDS and Public Policy Journal, 13, no. 1 (1998): 36–47.
16.
MannJ.M.TarantolaD.J.M., and NetterT.W., eds., AIDS in the World (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992); Panos Institute, The 3rd Epidemic: Repercussions of the Fear of AIDS (Budapest: Panos Institute, 1990); AggletonP., HIV and AIDS-Related Somatization, Discrimination and Denial: Research Studies From Uganda and India (Geneva: UNAIDS, 2000); GoldinC.S., “Stigmatization and AIDS: Critical Issues in Public Health,”Social Science and Medicine, 39 (1994): 1359–66; MalcolmA.“HIV-Related Stigmatization and Discrimination: Its Forms and Contexts,”Critical Public Health, 8 (1998): 347–70.
17.
For more extensive discussion of how AIDS-related stigma has been enacted, see Herek, supra note 3; Herek and Glunt, supra note 3; National Association of People with AIDS [NAPWA], HIV in America: A Profile of the Challenges Facing Americans Living with HIV (Washington, D.C.: NAPWA, 1992).
18.
GielenA.C., “Women's Disclosure of HIV Status: Experiences of Mistreatment and Violence in an Urban Setting,”Women and Health, 25, no. 3 (1997): 19–31; KlitzmanR., Being Positive: The Lives of Men and Women with HIV (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1997); ZierlerS., “Violence Victimization After HIV Infection in a U.S. Probability Sample of Adult Patients in Primary Care,”American Journal of Public Health, 90 (2000): 208–15; NAPWA, supra note 17; PageS., “Accommodating Persons with AIDS: Acceptance and Rejection in Rental Situations,”Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29 (1999): 261–70; FifeB.L. and WrightE.R., “The Dimensionality of Stigma: A Comparison of Its Impact on the Self of Persons with HIV/AIDS and Cancer,”Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41 (2000): 50–67.
19.
GostinL.O., “The AIDS Litigation Project: A National Review of Court and Human Rights Commission Decisions, Part I: The Social Impact of AIDS,”JAMA, 263 (1990): 1961–70; GostinL.O., “The AIDS Litigation Project: A National Review of Court and Human Rights Commission Decisions, Part II: Discrimination,”JAMA, 263 (1990): 2086–93; GostinL.O. and WebberD.W., “The AIDS Litigation Project: HIV/AIDS in the Courts in the 1990s, Part 1,”AIDS and Public Policy Journal, 12 (1997): 105–21; GostinL.O. and WebberD., “The AIDS Litigation Project: HIV/AIDS in the Courts in the 1990s, Part 2,”AIDS and Public Policy Journal, 13 (1998): 3–19.
20.
BlakeS.M. and ArkinE.B., AIDS Information Monitor: A Summary of National Public Opinion Surveys on AIDS: 1983 Through 1986 (Burlingame, California: Down There Press, 1988); SingerE. and RogersT.F., “Public Opinion and AIDS,”AIDS and Public Policy Journal, 1 (1986): 1–13; RogersT.F.SingerE., and ImperioJ., “AIDS: An Update,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 57 (1993): 92–114; HerekG.M. and GluntE.K., “AIDS-Related Attitudes in the United States: A Preliminary Conceptualization,”The Journal of Sex Research, 28 (1991): 99–123; Herek, supra note 3.
21.
HerekG.M.CapitanioJ.P., and WidamanK.F., “HIV-Related Stigma and Knowledge in the United States: Prevalence and Trends, 1991–1999,”American Journal of Public Health, 92 (2002): 371–77, at 372–75.
22.
Id. at 372.
23.
WeinerB., “AIDS from an Attributional Perspective,” in PryorJ.B. and ReederG.D., eds., The Social Psychology of HIV Infection (Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993): 287–302.
24.
HerekCapitanio, and Widaman, supra note 21, at 373.
25.
LentineD.A., “HIV-Related Knowledge and Stigma — United States, 2000,”Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 49 (2000): 1062–64.
26.
For more findings from the survey, see HerekCapitanio, and Widaman, supra note 21. See also CapitanioJ.P. and HerekG.M., “AIDS-Related Stigma and Attitudes Toward Injecting Drug Users Among Black and White Americans,”American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1148–61; HerekG.M. and CapitanioJ.P., “AIDS Stigma and Sexual Prejudice,”American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1130–47.
27.
In his classic analysis of stigma, for example, Goffman paid relatively little notice to how a particular characteristic or condition comes to be stigmatized in the first place, taking this to be largely a given, a part of the social structure. Instead, he focused mainly on how stigma affects face-to-face encounters.
28.
E.g., Goffman, supra note 4; Jones, supra note 4.
29.
Weiner, supra note 23.
30.
E.g., Capitanio and Herek, supra note 26; Herek and Capitanio, supra note 26.
31.
E.g., Herek and Capitanio, supra note 26.
32.
Blake and Arkin, supra note 20.
33.
Goffman, supra note 4; Jones, Supra note 4.
34.
Herek, supra note 3.
35.
HerekCapitanio, and Widaman, supra note 21. For analyses of how beliefs about casual contact interact with prejudice against people with HIV, see HerekG.M., “The Social Construction of Attitudes: Functional Consensus and Divergence in the U.S. Public's Reactions to AIDS,” in MaioG.R. and OlsonJ.M., eds., Why We Evaluate: Functions of Attitudes (Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000): 325–64; HerekG.M. and CapitanioJ.P., “Symbolic Prejudice or Fear of Infection? A Functional Analysis of AIDS-Related Stigma Among Heterosexual Adults,”Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20 (1998): 230–241; Herek and Capitanio, supra note 26.
36.
Goffman, supra note 4, at 4.
37.
Id.; Jones, supra note 4.
38.
Goffman, supra note 4, at 28.
39.
Id.
40.
Id. at 4.
41.
Klitzman, supra note 18.
42.
Goffman, supra note 4, at 28–31.
43.
PoindexterC.C. and LinskN.L., “HIV-Related Stigma in a Sample of HIV-Affected Older Female African American Caregivers,”Social Work, 44 (1999): 46–61; van der StratenA., “Managing HIV Among Serodiscordant Heterosexual Couples: Serostatus, Stigma and Sex,”AIDS Care, 10 (1998): 533–48; SnyderM.OmotoA.M., and CrainA.L., “Punished for Their Good Deeds: Stigmatization of AIDS Volunteers,”American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1175–92.
44.
Herek, supra note 35; Herek and Capitanio, supra note 35; PryorJ.B.ReederG.D., and LandauS., “A Social-Psychological Analysis of HIV-Related Stigma: A Two-Factor Theory,”American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1193–211.
45.
See generally SontagS., Illness as Metaphor (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1978); SontagS., AIDS and Its Metaphors (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1989).
46.
Goldin, supra note 16; Malcolm, supra note 16; MannTarantola, and Netter, supra note 16. Panos Institute, supra note 16; SabatierR., Blaming Others: Prejudice, Race and Worldwide AIDS (Philadelphia: New Society, 1988).
47.
Herek, supra note 35; Herek and Capitanio, supra note 26.
48.
Herek and Capitanio, supra note 26.
49.
Capitanio and Herek, supra note 26; FulliloveM.T. and FulliloveR.E.I., “Stigma as an Obstacle to AIDS Action,”American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1117–29.
50.
For a review, see BrownL.TrujilloL., and MacintyreK., Interventions to Reduce HIV/AIDS Stigma: What Have We Learned? (New York: Population Council, 2001).
51.
The total 1999 sample included 666 respondents who were recontacted after participating in a similar 1997 survey as well as 669 new respondents. Some data from the 1999 interviews with the recontacted participants have been reported elsewhere (HerekCapitanio, and Widaman, supra note 21). Respondents were included in the present analyses only if they identified themselves as heterosexual in a screening question. Because of missing data for some variables, the sample size for the correlation coefficients shown in Table 1 ranged from 1, 197 to 1, 258. For the regression analysis, the sample size was 1, 185. Details about the sampling methods, response rates, interview procedures, and other aspects of the methodology, including the wording of individual items, are reported in HerekCapitanio, and Widaman, supra note 21; HerekG.M., “Gender Gaps in Public Opinion About Lesbians and Gay Men,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 66 (2002): 40–66; HerekG.M., “Heterosexuals' Attitudes Toward Bisexual Men and Women in the United States,”Journal of Sex Research, 39 (2002): In press.
52.
This index was computed by counting the number of stigmatizing responses each person gave to nine different items designed to measure various aspects of AIDS-related stigma. The items assessed the extent to which respondents felt angry, disgusted, and afraid of people with AIDS; would avoid interacting with a person with AIDS in an office; would have their child avoid an HIV-infected schoolmate; would refrain from shopping at a neighborhood grocery store whose owner had AIDS; supported quarantining people with AIDS; believed that the names of those with AIDS should be made public; and believed that those who were infected through sex or drug use got what they deserved. More information about this measure is reported in HerekCapitanio, and Widaman, supra note 21.
53.
The variables listed in Table 1 were derived from a series of exploratory analyses with a larger number of variables. The variables of marital status, number of children, race, and political party affiliation displayed negligible correlations with AIDS stigma and were dropped from the analysis. A “negligible” correlation was operationally defined as r <0.10 (i.e., the variable shared less than 1 percent of variance with the AIDS stigma index).
54.
The coefficients can potentially range from −1.00 to +1.00, with values near zero indicating little or no association between the two variables and values near −1.00 or +1.00 indicating a strong association. The sign of the coefficient indicates the direction of the relationship. A positive coefficient means that as values of one variable increased, values of the other also increased; a negative coefficient means that as values of one variable increased, values of the other decreased.
55.
See generally AdornoT.W., The Authoritarian Personality (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1950); AltemeyerB., Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1988).
56.
A correlation coefficient less than r = 0.14 means that the variable shares only about 1 percent of its variance with AIDS stigma scores. These associations are statistically significant mainly because the sample for the survey was relatively large, but they have little substantive importance in the present analysis.
57.
Like correlation coefficients, values for β can potentially range from −1.00 to +1.00, with values near zero indicating that the variable has little or no predictive power and values near −1.00 or +1.00 indicating that the variable helps to explain a substantial amount of variation in AIDS stigma scores. As with correlation coefficients, the sign of β (positive or negative) indicates the direction of the relationship (see note 54, supra).
58.
RosenbergC.E., The Cholera Years: The United States in 1832, 1849, and 1866 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).
59.
Id. at 13−98.
60.
Id. at 5, 101–225. See also RosenbergC.E., “Disease and Social Order in America: Perceptions and Expectations,” in FeeE. and FoxD.M., eds., AIDS: The Burdens of History (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988): 12–32.
61.
HerekCapitanio, and Widaman, supra note 21.
62.
HerekG.M., “The HIV Epidemic and Public Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men,” in LevineM.P.NardiP., and GagnonJ., eds., In Changing Times: Gay Men and Lesbians Encounter HIV/AIDS (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997): 191–218; Herek and Capitanio, supra note 26.
63.
Herek and Capitanio, supra note 26, at 1140–42.
64.
See generally ThomasS.B. and QuinnS.C., “The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932 to 1972: Implications for HIV Education and AIDS Risk Education Programs in the Black Community,”American Journal of Public Health, 81 (1991): 1498–505; TurnerP.A., I Heard It Through the Grapevine: Rumor in African-American Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993).
65.
HerekG.M. and CapitanioJ.P., “Conspiracies, Contagion, and Compassion: Trust and Public Reactions to AIDS,”AIDS Education and Prevention, 6 (1994): 365–75, at 370–72.
66.
ColeS.W., “Elevated Physical Health Risk Among Gay Men Who Conceal Their Homosexual Identity,”Health Psychology, 15 (1996): 243–51; ColeS.W.KemenyM.E., and TaylorS.E., “Social Identity and Physical Health: Accelerated HIV Progression in Rejection-Sensitive Gay Men,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72 (1997): 320–35; HerekG.M., “Why Tell If You're Not Asked? Self-Disclosure, Intergroup Contact, and Heterosexuals' Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men,” in HerekG.M.JobeJ., and CarneyR., eds., Out in Force: Sexual Orientation and the Military (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996): 197–225.
67.
AllportG.W., The Nature of Prejudice (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1954): at 261–82.
68.
PettigrewT.F. and TroppL.R., “Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice: Recent Meta-Analytic Findings,” in OskampS., ed., Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination (Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000): 93–114.
69.
HerekG.M. and CapitanioJ.P., “‘Some of My Best Friends’: Intergroup Contact, Concealable Stigma, and Heterosexuals' Attitudes Toward Gay Men and Lesbians,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22 (1996): 412–24; HerekG.M. and GluntE.K., “Interpersonal Contact and Heterosexuals' Attitudes Toward Gay Men: Results from a National Survey,”Journal of Sex Research, 30 (1993): 239–44; SchneiderW. and LewisI.A.“The Straight Story on Homosexuality and Gay Rights,”Public Opinion, February-March 1984, at 16–20, 59–60.
70.
GerbertB.SumserJ., and MaguireB.T., “The Impact of Who You Know and Where You Live on Opinions About AIDS and Health Care,”Social Science and Medicine, 32 (1991): 677–81; HenryK.CampbellS., and WillenbringK., “A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Variables Impacting on AIDS-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Among Employees of a Minnesota Teaching Hospital,”AIDS Education and Prevention, 2 (1990): 36–47; HerekG.M. and CapitanioJ.P., “AIDS Stigma and Contact with Persons with AIDS: The Effects of Personal and Vicarious Contact,”Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27 (1997): 1–36; ZimetG.D., “Attitudes of Teenagers Who Know Someone with AIDS,”Psychological Reports, 70 (1992): 1169–70; ZimetG.D., “Knowing Someone with AIDS: The Impact on Adolescents,”Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 16 (1991): 287–94.
71.
“From Hero to Crusader,”Newsweek, November 18, 1991, at 69.
72.
MontvilleL., “Like One of the Family,”Sports Illustrated, November 18, 1991, 44–45.
73.
KalichmanS.C., “Earvin ‘Magic’ Johnson's HIV Serostatus Disclosure: Effects on Men's Perceptions of AIDS,”Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61 (1993): 887–91
74.
DannemeyerW., Shadow in the Land: Homosexuality in America (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1989): at 217–23. Allan Brandt's study of the history of venereal disease in the United States probably offers a better model for symbolic AIDS stigma than Rosenberg's history of cholera. See BrandtA.M., No Magic Bullet: A Social History of Venereal Disease in the United States Since 1880 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).
75.
Dannemeyer, supra note 74; CameronP., Exposing the AIDS Scandal (Lafayette, Louisiana: Huntington House, 1988). See also BaileyW.A., “The Importance of HIV Prevention Programming to the Lesbian and Gay Community,” in HerekG.M. and GreeneB., eds., AIDS, Identity, and Community: The HIV Epidemic and Lesbians and Gay Men (Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 1995): 210–25.
76.
StevensonM.R., “Promoting Tolerance for Homosexuality: An Evaluation of Intervention Strategies,”The Journal of Sex Research, 25 (1988): 500–11; HerekG.M., “Stigma, Prejudice, and Violence Against Lesbians and Gay Men,” in GonsiorekJ.C. and WeinrichJ.D., eds., Homosexuality: Research Implications for Public Policy (Newbury Park, California: Sage, 1991): 60–80.
77.
See generally Stevenson, supra note 76; Herek, supra note 76.
78.
See id.
79.
Herek and Capitanio, supra note 69.
80.
Pettigrew and Tropp, supra note 68.
81.
The stigma associated with injecting drug use is quite different from that associated with homosexuality. The American public shows growing acceptance of its gay and lesbian members and is increasingly willing to support their civil rights and liberties in many areas. Whereas homosexuality is widely considered to be irrelevant to an individual's ability to function effectively in society, injecting drug use is generally considered a social evil and IDUs are regarded very negatively. See Capitanio and Herek, supra note 26.
82.
See generally BurrisS., “Studying the Legal Management of HIV-Related Stigma,”American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1229–43.
83.
Burris, supra note 82, at 1235. Regarding ballot initiatives that would have severely curtailed the civil liberties of people with HIV, see KriegerN. and LashofJ.C., “AIDS, Policy Analysis, and the Electorate: The Role of Schools of Public Health,”American Journal of Public Health, 78 (1988): 411–15; HerekG.M. and GluntE.K., “Public Attitudes Toward AIDS-Related Issues in the United States,” in PryorJ.B. and ReederG.D., eds., The Social Psychology of HIV Infection (Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993): 229–61.
84.
See, e.g., “Interventions to Prevent HIV Risk Behaviors,”NIH Consensus Statement, 15, no. 2 (1997): 1–41; MillerH.G.TurnerC.F., and MosesL.E., eds., AIDS: The Second Decade (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1990).
85.
Burris, supra note 83; Bailey, supra note 75; HerediaC., “S.F.'s HIV Fight May Be Too Sexy: Feds to Review City's Prevention Programs,”San Francisco Chronicle, November 16, 2001, at A25; OrnsteinC., “Explicit Ads Prompt a Review of U.S. AIDS Prevention Grants,”Los Angeles Times, January 4, 2002, at A1.
86.
“Interventions to Prevent HIV Risk Behaviors,”supra note 84; Des JarlaisD.C., “Research, Politics, and Needle Exchange,”American Journal of Public Health, 90 (2000): 1392–94.
87.
For example, see EpsteinS., Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996).
88.
ParkerR.G., “Sexuality, Culture, and Power in HIV/AIDS Research,”Annual Review of Anthropology, 30 (2001): 163–79.