See, for example, In re Requena, 213 N.J. Super. 443, 517 A.2d 869 (Super. Ct. App. Div. 1986); and Bouvia v. Superior Court, 179 Cal. App. 3d 1127, 225 Cal. Rptr. 297 (Ct. App. 1986).
4.
LevyJ.K., “Jehovah's Witnesses, Pregnancy, and Blood Transfusions: A Paradigm for the Autonomy of Rights of all Pregnant Women,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 27 (1999): 171–89.
5.
See In re DuBreuil, 629 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 1993).
6.
In re A.C., 573 A.2d 1235 (D.C. 1990).
7.
In re Baby Boy Doe, 632 N.E.2d 326 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994).
8.
A.C., 573 A.2d at 1239.
9.
Doe, 632 N.E.2d at 330.
10.
In re Fetus Brown, 689 N.E.2d 397 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997).
11.
Id. at 405.
12.
See In re DuBreuil, 629 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 1993).
13.
Johnson v. State, 602 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 1992).
14.
American Medical Association Board of Trustees, “Legal Interventions During Pregnancy: Court-Ordered Medical Treatments and Legal Penalties for Potentially Harmful Behavior by Pregnant Women,”JAMA, 264 (1990): 2663–70, at 2666.
15.
See Levy, supra note 4, at 178.
16.
Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority, 274 S.E.2d 457 (Ga. 1981).
17.
See, for example, DuBreuil, 629 So. 2d 819; and In re Fetus Brown, 689 N.E.2d 397 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997).
18.
See In re Quackenbush, 383 A.2d 785 (Morris County Ct. 1978); and Lane v. Candura, 376 N.E.2d 1232 (Mass. App. Ct. 1978).
19.
See Bouvia v. Superior Court, 179 Cal. App. 3d 1127, 225 Cal. Rptr. 297 (Ct. App. 1986); In re Requena, 213 N.J. Super. 443, 517 A.2d 869 (Super. Ct. App. Div. 1986); and In re Quinlan, 355 A.2d 647 (N.J. 1976), cert. denied. sub nom. Garger v. New Jersey, 429 U.S. 922 (1976).
20.
See Levy, supra note 4, at 184.
21.
Requena, 517 A.2d at 893.
22.
See Whitner v. State, 492 S.E.2d 777 (S.C. 1997), cert. denied (1998).
23.
See S.D. Codified Laws, §§ 34–23B-2, −20A-23 (Michie 1999).
