ClarkM.A., “This Little Piggy Went to Market: The Xenotransplantation and Xenozoonose Debate,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 27 (1999): 137–52.
2.
Id. at 137.
3.
See id. at 138, 143, 139, 144.
4.
See PlattJ.L., “New Directions for Organ Transplantation,”Nature, 392, Supp. (1998): A11–A17; and WeissR.A., “Science, Medicine, and the Future: Xenotransplantation,”British Medical Journal, 317 (1998): 931–32.
5.
See Clark, supra note 1, at 138.
6.
See RanjitJ.ArtripJ.H.MichlerR.E., “Genetically Engineered Organs,”Advances in Cardiac Surgery, 10 (1998): 229–44.
7.
See VanderpoolH.Y., “Critical Ethical Issues in Clinical Trials with Xenotransplants,”Lancet, 351 (1998): 1347–50.
8.
See ChapmanL.E., “Xenotransplantation and Xenogeneic Infections,”N. Engl. J. Med., 333 (1995): 1498–501.
9.
See AllanJ.S., “Xenograft Transplantation and the Infectious Disease Conundrum,”ILAR Journal, 37 (1995): 37–48; WeiglerB.J., “Biology of B Virus in Macaque and Human Hosts: A Review,”Clinical Infectious Disease, 14 (1992): 55–67; HeneineW, “Identification of a Human Population Infected with Simian Foamy Viruses,”Nature Medicine, 4 (1998): 403–07; and “Guidance for Industry: Public Health Issues Posed by the Use of Nonhuman Primate Xenografts in Humans,” 64 Fed. Reg. 16,743–44 (1999).
10.
64 Fed. Reg. 16,743–44.
11.
See Le TissierP., “Two Sets of Human-Trophic Pig Retrovirus,”Nature, 389 (1997): 681–82; and PatienceC.TakeuchiY.WeissR.A., “Infection of Human Cells by an Endogenous Retrovirus of Pigs,”Nature Medicine, 3 (1997): 282–86.
12.
See Letter from RissoS.T., “FDA Letter to Sponsors of Porcine Xenograft” (Oct. 16, 1997).
13.
See HeneineW., “No Evidence of Infection with Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus in Recipients of Porcine Islet-Cell Xenografts,”Lancet, 352 (1998): 695–99; and PatienceC., “No Evidence of Pig DNA or Retroviral Infection in Patients with Short-Term Extracorporeal Connection to Pig Kidneys,”Lancet, 352 (1998): 699–701.
14.
See MartinU., “Expression of Pig Endogenous Retrovirus by Primary Porcine Endothelial Cells and Infection of Human Cells,”Lancet, 352 (1998): 692–94; and MartinU., “Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus (PERV) Was Not Transmitted from Transplanted Porcine Endothelial Cells to Baboons In Vivo,”Transplantation International, 11 (1998): 247–51.
15.
See Clark, supra note 1, at 145.
16.
See Committee on Xenograft Transplantation Ethical Issues and Public Policy, Institute of Medicine, Xenotransplantation: Science, Ethics, and Public Policy (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1996) [hereinafter Institute of Medicine]; and Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Animal-to-Human Transplants: The Ethics of Xenotransplantation (London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 1996).
17.
See Vanderpool, supra note 7; Institute of Medicine, supra note 16; and McCarthyC.R., “Ethical Aspects of Animal-to-Human Xenografts,”ILAR Journal, 37 (1995): 3–9.
18.
See Clark, supra note 1, at 148.
19.
See id. at 144.
20.
See ZanerR.M., “Surprise! You're Just Like Me?: Reflections on Cloning, Eugenics, and Other Utopias,” in HumberJ.M.AlmederR.F., eds., Human Cloning (Totowa: Humana Press, 1998): 105–51.
21.
See Clark, supra note 1, at 141.
22.
See CaplanA.L., “Is Xenografting Morally Wrong?,”Transplantation Proceedings, 24 (1992): 722–27.
23.
See BuckleS., “Natural Law,” in SingerP., ed., A Companion to Ethics (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1993): 161–74.
24.
Id. at 172.
25.
See Nuffield Council on Bioethics, supra note 16; and VeatchR.M., “The Ethics of Xenografts,”Transplantation Proceedings, 3 (1986): 93–97.
26.
See Clark, supra note 1, at 137.
27.
Id. at 148.
28.
See RanjitArtripMichler, supra note 6.
29.
See Weiss, supra note 4.
30.
See RanjitArtripMichler, supra note 6.
31.
See Institute of Medicine, supra note 16, at 57–61.
32.
Id. at 71.
33.
See Platt, supra note 4; and DorlingA., “Clinical Xenotransplantation of Solid Organs,”Lancet, 349 (1997): 867–75.