See, for example, RothenbergK.H.ThomsonE.J., eds., Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1994); OverallC., Ethics and Human Reproduction (Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1987); RothmanB.K., The Tentative Pregnancy: Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood (New York: Viking, 1986); CoreaG., The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs (New York: Harper & Row, 1985); StanworthM., ed., Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987); CallahanJ., ed., Reproduction, Ethics and the Law: Feminist Perspectives (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995); DanielsC.R., At Women's Expense: State Power and the Politics of Fetal Rights (Cambridge-Harvard University Press, 1993); BolingP., ed., Expecting Trouble: Surrogacy, Fetal Abuse & New Reproductive Technologies (Boulder: Westview Press, 1995); ArdittiR., eds., Test-Tube Women: What Future for Motherhood (Boston: Pandora, 1984); HolmesH.B., ed., Issues in Reproductive Technology I: An Anthology (New York: Garland, 1992); HolmesH.B., eds., The Custom-Made Child?—Women-Centered Perspectives (Clifton: Humana, 1981); ChadwickR.F., ed., Ethics, Reproduction and Genetic Control (London: Routledge, rev. ed., 1992); RaymondJ.G., Women as Wombs: Reproductive Technologies and the Battle Over Women's freedom (New York: Harper Collins, 1993); SenG.SnowR.C., eds., Power and Decision: The Social Control of Reproduction (Boston: Harvard University Press, 1994); RowlandR., Living Laboratories: Women and Reproductive Technologies (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992); and SpalloneP.SteinbergD.I., eds., Made to Order: The Myth of Reproductive and Genetic Progress (New York: Pergamon, 1987).
2.
TongR., Feminist Approaches to Bioethics (Boulder: Westview Press, 1997); MahowaldM.B., Women and Children in Health Care: An Unequal Majority (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993); HolmesH.B.PurdyL.M., eds., Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992); SherwinS., No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics and Health Care (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992); DulaA.GoeringS., eds., “It Just Ain't Fair”: The Ethics of Health Care for African Americans (Westport: Praeger, 1994); WhiteE.C., ed., The Black Women's Health Book: Speaking for Ourselves (Seattle: Seal Press, 1990); ToddA.D., Intimate Adversaries: Cultural Conflict Between Doctors and Women Patients (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989); FisherS., In the Patient's Best Interest: Women and the Politics of Medical Decisions (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1986); and DarvallL., Medicine, Law and Social Change: The Impact of Bioethics, Feminism and Bights Movements on Medical Decision-Making (Brookfield: Dartmouth Press, 1993).
3.
The endnotes to Susan Wolf's introductory essay provide an outstanding source for bioethical scholars and practitioners. See WolfS.M., “Introduction: Gender and Feminism in Bioethics,” in WolfS.M., ed., Feminism & Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996): At 33–43.
4.
SherwinS., “Feminism and Bioethics,” in Wolf, ed., supra note 3, at 47–66; TongR., “Feminist Approaches to Bioethics,” in Wolf, ed., supra note 3, at 67–94; and MahowaldM.B., “On Treatment of Myopia: Feminist Standpoint Theory and Bioethics,” in Wolf, ed., supra note 3, at 95–115. These three articles may seem repetitive to the schooled feminist reader who has read their books and/or other writings and has a grounding in feminist theory and bioethics.
5.
MertonV., “Ethical Obstacles to Participation of Women in Biomedical Research,” in Wolf, ed., supra note 3, at 216–51; and FadenR.KassN.McGrawD., “Women as Vessels and Vectors: Lessons from the HIV Epidemic,” in Wolf, ed., supra note 3, at 252–81.
6.
SmithJ.F., “Communicative Ethics in Medicine: The Physician-Patient Relationship,” in Wolf, ed., supra note 3, at 184–215.
7.
RobertsD.E., “Reconstructing the Patient: Starting with Women of Color,” in Wolf, ed., supra note 3, at 116–43; and DresserR., “What Bioethics Can Learn from the Women's Health Movement,” in Wolf, ed., supra note 3, at 144–59. Actually, both articles are in Part I, but they seem to fit better here in my review.
8.
AschA.GellerG., “Feminism, Bioethics, and Genetics,” in Wolf, ed., supra note 3, at 318–50.
9.
NelsonH.L.NelsonJ.L., “Justice in the Allocation of Health Care Resources: A Feminist Account,” in Wolf, ed., supra note 3, at 351–70.
10.
WolfS.M., “Gender, Feminism, and Death: Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia,” in Wolf, ed., supra note 3, at 282–317.
11.
PurdyL.M., “A Feminist View of Health,” in Wolf, ed., supra note 3, at 163–83.
12.
See, for example, RobertsD.E., “Unshackling Black Motherhood,”Michigan Law Review, 95 (1997): 938–64; RobertsD.E., “Race and the New Reproduction,”Hastings Law Journal, 47 (1996): 935–94; RobertsD.E., “Racism and Patriarchy in the Meaning of Motherhood,”American University Journal of Gender and the Law, 1 (1993): 1–38; and RobertsD.E., “Punishing Drug Addicts Who Have Babies: Women of Color, Equality, and the Right of Privacy,”Harvard Law Review, 104 (1991): 1419–82.
13.
See Dresser, supra note 7; and Boston Women's Health Book Collective, The New Our Bodies, Ourselves: A Book By and For Women (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992).
14.
Purdy, supra note 11, at 177.
15.
See Smith, supra note 6.
16.
See Merton, supra note 5.
17.
See FadenKassMcGraw, supra note 5.
18.
See id. at 260.
19.
See Wolf, supra note 10.
20.
Washington v. Glucksberg, 117 S. Ct. 37 (1996) (granting cert.); and Quill v. Vacco, 117 S. Ct. 36 (1996) (granting cert.).