KlevitHarvey D.BatesAlan C.CastanaresTinaPaul KirkE.Sipes-MetzlerPiage R.WopatRichard, “Prioritization of Health Care Services: A Progress Report by the Oregon Health Services Commission,”Archives of Internal Medicine, 151 (1991): 912–16.
2.
VeatchRobert M., “Should Basic Care Get Priority? Doubts About Rationing the Oregon Way,”Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1, no. 3 (1991): 187–206.
3.
SaltusRichard, “Who Lives, Who Dies—And Who Pays?,”The Washington Post Health, Aug. 31, 1993, p. 7.
4.
Ibid.
5.
RawlsJohn, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971); and VeatchRobert M., “Justice and the Right to Health Care: An Egalitarian Account,” in BoleThomas J.IIIBondesonWilliam B., eds., Rights to Health Care (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991), pp. 83–102.
6.
For a fuller discussion of the difference between the “moment-in-time” and “over-a-lifetime” perspectives, see VeatchRobert M., “Distributive Justice and the Allocation of Technological Resources to the Elderly,”Life-Sustaining Technologies and the Elderly: Working Papers, Volume 3, Legal and Ethical Issues, Manpower and Training, and Classification Systems for Decisionmaking (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, 1987), pp. 87–189; and VeatchRobert M., “How Age Should Matter: Justice as the Basis for Limiting Care to the Elderly,” in WinslowGerald R.WaltersJames W., eds., Facing Limits: Ethics and Health Care for the Elderly (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1993), pp. 211–29.
