For a good summary of their development, see BrownTheodore M., “An Historical View of Health Care Teams,” in AgichGeorge, ed., Responsibility in Health Care (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1982), pp. 3–21.
2.
NagiSaad Z., “Teamwork in Health Care in the United States: A Sociological Perspective,”Milbank Mem. Fund Quarterly, 53 (1975): 75–91.
3.
RothbergJune, “Nurses and Team Practice,” in LeccaP.J.McNeilJ.S., eds., Interdisciplinary Team Practice, Issues and Trends (New York: Praeger, 1985), pp. 23–24.
4.
BrillN., Teamwork: Working Together in the Human Services (Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1976).
5.
To set this modern understanding of teamwork into the larger context of interprofessional relationships in health care, see PurtiloRuth, “Support and Challenge in Professional Peer Relationships,” in PurtiloRuth, Ethical Dimensions in the Health Professions (Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 2d ed., 1993), ch. 13. I am grateful to Steven Miles for suggesting the language of “instrumental and moral functions.” It captures aptly the focus of my comments in the above chapter.
6.
For a thorough historical and contemporary treatment of this phenomenon in a collection that includes numerous case studies from many dimensions of health care, see ReiserStanley J.AnbarMichael, eds., The Machine at the Bedside: Strategies for Using Technology in Patient Care (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).
7.
Many have written on the ways in which reliance on technology has affected health care delivery. For a treatment of this issue from the point of view of its effect on the rehabilitation team, see PurtiloRuth, “Rehabilitation and Technology: Ethical Considerations,”International J. of Technol. and Aging, 4, no. 2 (1991): 163–70.
8.
CassellEric, “The Sorcerer's Broom: Medicine's Rampant Technology,”Hastings Center Report, 23 (1993): 32–39.
9.
ShineKenneth, president of the Institute of Medicine, made this observation in a presentation entitled “Health Care Reform and Academic Health Centers,”which was given at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, March 15, 1994.
10.
ClintonBill, “The Clinton Health Care Plan,”N. Engl. J. Med., 327 (1992): 804–07.
11.
For a discussion of how stresses from the outside can have a deleterious effect on team spirit and function, see PurtiloRuth B.MeierRobert H., “Regulatory Constraints and Patient Empowerment,”J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 72 (1993): 327–30. A portion of the chapter by CassemNed, “Treatment Decisions in Irreversible Illness,” in HackettThomasCassemEdwin H., eds., The Massachusetts General Hospital Handbook of General Hospital Psychiatry (St. Louis: Mosby, 1978), pp. 562–75, is devoted to the effects of team stresses in the intensive care unit.
12.
As one of the architects of the approach, Paul Ellwood makes this claim in “Outcomes Management: A Technology of Patient Experience,”N. Engl. J. Med., 318 (1988): 1549–56.
13.
Personal communication with MilesSteven M.D., March 14, 1994.
14.
The addition of patient satisfaction scales will help to alter this skew in the direction of a higher valuation on moral functions. At present, patient satisfaction scales are imperfectly developed, or are not used at all, in many health services research settings.
15.
For a thorough critique of the major principles that were proposed by the Ethical Foundations Working Group of the Clinton Health Care Task Force, see GostinLarry, “Foreword: Health Care Reform in the United States—The Presidential Task Force,”Am. J. of Law & Med., 19, no. 1–2 (1993): 1–7.
16.
HadornDavid, “The Problem of Discrimination in Health Care Priority Setting,”JAMA, 268 (1992): 1454–59.
17.
This issue seldom is addressed directly, but it can be implied in several themes, most notably those addressing the need for a shift from specialty to primary care and community-oriented practices. For one example that combines both, see WrightRichard A., “Community-Oriented Primary Care: The Cornerstone of Health Care Reform,”JAMA, 269 (1993): 2544–47.
18.
EmanuelEzekielBrettDavid, “Managed Competition and the Patient-Physician Relationship,”N. Engl. J. Med., 329 (1993): 879–82.
19.
EpsteinArnold M., “The Framework of Heatlh Care Reform,”N. Engl. J. Med., 329 (1993): 1666–76 (italics mine). Dr. Epstein is by no means the only one whose writing suggests this role for outcomes research. I chose to cite him because of his ability to influence policy as one of the domestic policy advisors. The sources are too numerous to list here.
20.
For a debate on the value of enterprise liability, see Douglas PetersJ.JohnsonKirk B., “Can Enterprise Liability Ease America's Malpractice Problem?,”ASLME Briefings, no. 8 (1993): 1–3.