AndrewsL., New Conceptions: A Consumer's Guide to the Newest Infertility Treatments, Including In Vitro Fertilization, Artificial Insemination, and Surrogate Motherhood (St. Manin's Press, New York, N.Y.) (1984).
2.
RobertsonJ.A., Surrogate Mothers: Not So Novel After All, Hastings Center Report13(5): 28, 28 (October 1983).
3.
See RobertsonJ. A., Procreative Liberty and the Control of Conception, Pregnancy, and Childbirth, Virginia Law Review69(3): 405 (1983).
4.
For further arguments against surrogate parenting, see KrimmelH. T., The Case Against Surrogate Parenting, Hastings Center Report13(5): 35 (October 1983).
5.
Surrogate Mothers: Not So Novel After All, supra note 2, at 33.
6.
Legislative proposals have spanned the spectrum from prohibiting surrogate arrangements to facilitating them. New Jersey A. 3139 would make it a crime to participate in a surrogate mother arrangement. California, in A.B. 3771, aims to “facilitate the ability of infertile couples; to become parents through the employment of the services of a surrogate,” and allows reasonable compensation. H.B. 4114, in Michigan, aims to screen the surrogate and parents, to protect the natural mother's health, to spell out the contractual obligations of the parties, and to permit payment only of medical expenses and lost wages for the surrogate.
