Abstract
Commentary
A key reason that antiepileptogenic therapies have not yet been established is that current seizure medications act primarily on molecular mechanisms that generate the end-stage symptoms of epilepsy, that is, the seizures themselves. Many antiepileptic medications were identified through screening assays that assessed efficacy against acutely provoked seizures in nonepileptic animals. As a result, they inhibit seizures through mechanisms that directly decrease neuronal excitability, such as by modulating neurotransmitter receptors and ion channels. Since most of these drugs were not tested in chronic, preventative assays of epileptic animals, it is not unexpected that they may be less effective at modulating underlying mechanisms of epileptogenesis than at ameliorating seizures.
A better strategy for developing antiepileptogenic therapies might be to interrupt the initial mechanistic events that trigger downstream cellular and molecular changes in the brain that lead to seizures. This approach is particularly plausible and clinically relevant for acquired epilepsies that are caused by a remote brain injury (e.g., head trauma, stroke), with seizures starting after a prolonged period, from months to years later. During the latent period of epileptogenesis, histopathological and molecular changes (e.g., neuronal death, synaptic reorganization) that promote epileptogenesis occur and could be targeted for correction by an antiepileptogenic therapy.
The search for antiepileptogenic treatments might utilize a number of strategies. In the most rational, hypothesis-driven approach, drugs are developed to target a specific mechanism of action implicated in epileptogenesis. On the other extreme is a screening method, akin to the NIH Anticonvulsant Screening Program, in which potentially effective substances are randomly assessed, irrespective of the mechanism of action. An intermediate, pragmatic approach is to utilize compounds that have known or suspected biological properties or clinical efficacy for other conditions or diseases that intuitively would appear to have relevance for epilepsy, although the specific mechanism of action may not be known. In this respect, there has been recent interest in investigating compounds derived from plants and other natural products that may have medicinal applications. Although herbal therapy for epilepsy and other neurological disorders has a long tradition in some cultures, the mechanisms of action of most of these treatments have remained unknown, largely because research on this topic is rare (4). Recent studies, however, have begun to elucidate potential neuroprotective and antiepileptogenic actions of substances of botanical origin.
Resveratrol is a polyphenol chemical found in a number of plant species, including peanuts and grapes, but with significant amounts in red wine. In normal plant physiology, resveratrol is produced as a defensive response to injury or parasitic attacks. Resveratrol has diverse biological properties and actions with potential clinical applications, including antiinflammatory, antioxidant, antiproliferative, and neuroprotective effects. Based primarily on animal models and cell culture, there is some evidence that resveratrol could be a potential treatment for a variety of diseases, ranging from cancer, cardiac disease, and neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer's, Huntington's, and Parkinson's, although rigorous clinical data in people are sparse (5).
A number of biological properties of resveratrol suggest that it could also be beneficial for epilepsy, particularly as an antiepileptogenic treatment. Previous studies indicated that resveratrol protects against neuronal death and acute seizures induced by the glutamate agonist, kainate (6,7). The recent study by Wu et al. examined the effect of resveratrol on epileptogenesis in the chronic kainate model, in which spontaneous seizures develop after a latent period following an episode of kainate-induced status epilepticus. Resveratrol treatment prevented the development of epilepsy in most rats and correspondingly decreased kainate-induced neuronal death, mossy fiber sprouting, and kainate receptor upregulation—all putative mechanisms of epileptogenesis, consistent with a strong antiepileptogenic action.
A very similar story has emerged for another polyphenol compound, curcumin, which originates from the Curcuma longa plant and is the principal ingredient in the popular Indian spice, tumeric. Tumeric has been used for centuries in parts of India as an herbal therapy for a variety of symptoms and medical conditions, ranging from infections and inflammatory diseases to cancer; however, it also is used to treat neurological diseases, such as Alzheimer's and epilepsy. Although, again, controlled clinical trials documenting efficacy are lacking, intense interest in curcumin as a potential therapeutic agent has stemmed from accumulating information on its diverse biological properties, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and chemotherapeutic activity (8). Similar to resveratrol, curcumin has been shown to inhibit acute seizures and neuronal death in the kainate model (9). The recent study by Jvoti et al. investigated the effect of curcumin on epileptogenesis in a rat model of posttraumatic epilepsy, in which iron injections into the neocortex mimics neuronal injury that occurs with blood extravasation during traumatic brain injury. Curcumin treatment decreased the development and progression of EEG abnormalities and seizures following the iron injection as well as improved deficits in spatial learning.
These two studies suggest that both resveratrol and cur-cumin retard epileptogenesis and could be considered potential antiepileptogenic therapies for epilepsies caused by acquired brain injury. However, a number of steps must be taken before the findings can be translated from animal models to human studies. First, the specific mechanisms of the neuroprotective or antiepileptogenic actions of the compounds need to be fully understood. In the Jvoti et al. study, correlative data suggested that antioxidant properties of curcumin, such as its effects on lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation, might account for a neuroprotective effect, but multiple other mechanisms could also be involved. One intriguing possibility arises from the recent finding that curcumin is an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, which has been implicated in mediating epileptogenesis in other models of epilepsy (10). Identification of the specific mechanisms will be helpful in optimizing treatments, leading to targeted therapies that are more effective than those currently available for brain injury and providing information on adverse effects. Second, the pharmacokinetics of these compounds need to be elaborated and optimized for humans. For example, although the biological actions of a low-dose regimen of curcumin in the Jvoti et al. study was comparable to that documented in other studies, substantially higher doses were required to see a maximal effect on epileptogenesis. Furthermore, while water insoluble curcumin readily permeates the blood–brain barrier, it has notoriously poor gastrointestinal tract absorption. Third, the critical therapeutic window for optimal application following brain injury remains to be defined. Most importantly, as promising drug effects in animal models frequently have not been reproduced in clinical trials, controlled data on the efficacy and safety of resveratrol and curcumin in humans are needed. Although the idea of natural, dietary therapies is inherently attractive to many people, time will tell whether herbal remedies have an established place in epilepsy therapy.
