Abstract
Commentary
Several types of data indicate a close anatomical and functional connection between the hippocampus and temporal neo-cortex. First, anatomical studies have shown that hippocampal projections to the temporal neocortex are mediated through the subiculum and the entorhinal cortex; the anterior part of the superior temporal gyrus and the temporal polar cortex appear to be the principal lateral temporal recipients in primates (3,6). Second, extrahippocampal temporal lobe atrophy has been described in association with hippocampal sclerosis (HS) in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (7). Third, PET studies in patients with mesial temporal epilepsy have revealed that temporal lobe hypometabolism extends over both its mesial and lateral aspects (8). Additionally, combined depth and subdural EEG recordings of hippocampal-originating seizures in humans found principal spread to temporal neocortex (9).
Some studies of verbal memory deficits after left temporal lobectomy correlate verbal memory loss with the extent of lateral temporal removal, while other studies correlate it with the amount of mesial temporal resection (3). Evidence is similarly mixed for naming. As in the current study, multiple prior reports have linked pathology and reduced function in the hippocampus to poor naming (10). Others have found postoperative naming changes associated with resection of larger volumes of neocortical tissue, regardless of whether or not surgery involved sparing of language eloquent cortex, as determined by stimulation mapping or anatomy (i.e., superior temporal gyrus) (11). Further, although strict damage to mesial structures from herpes simplex encephalitis often results in specific amnesia without deficits in naming or other measures of semantic memory, naming may be affected if lateral temporal cortex also is compromised (12).
The foregoing data suggest that naming and other verbal memory functions are the product of concerted mesial and lateral temporal activity. Hamberger et al. discuss further evidence of this hypothesis, which melds well with a more recent model of memory, called multiple trace theory, which emphasizes different strengths in the interactions and connections between these brain areas depending on whether the information was learned recently or more remotely. The multiple trace theory asserts that hippocampal regions may be involved in retrieving certain aspects of semantic memory (including object names), even if they are stored primarily in extrahippocampal cortex (13). This interactionist view helps interpret an interesting pattern reported in this and other studies (14), that is, the apparent greater sensitivity of the Boston Naming Test to postlobectomy changes compared with other visual naming measures. Hamberger et al. suggested that the greater proportion of low-frequency words in the Boston Naming Test might partly explain this finding. This theory is consistent with hypotheses in multiple trace theory and with the finding that words learned later in life are more susceptible to loss after anterior medial temporal lobectomy (15).
The current study found better post–temporal lobectomy naming among HS patients with as compared with non-HS patients, which correlated with a preoperative displacement of auditory naming posterior to usual dominant temporal lobe resections, as shown by preoperative or intraoperative mapping. No such displacement occurred among non-HS temporal lobe epilepsy patients. This finding is in alignment with the possibility that the persistent dysfunction associated with HS epilepsy will more effectively engender cortical reorganization than will intermittent disruptions associated with non-HS focal epilepsy. Furthermore, despite a greater total number of neocortical temporal naming areas in patients with HS, including anterior regions, naming was less affected by temporal resection. It has been suggested that cortical reorganization may produce a protective factor against postoperative decline, possibly because those additional language sites are redundant (11); however, cortical reorganization possibly may represent migration of functions normally mediated by nonsclerotic hippocampal tissue. Further investigation is necessary to better understand this apparent greater neuroplasticity.
Despite the lack of any study specifically linking post-temporal lobectomy naming ability with quality of life, the displacement of auditory naming sites to a more posterior distribution is good news for HS patients and their caregivers. The presence of HS is the most consistently demonstrated predictor of a good seizure outcome (16), substantially better than that for temporal lobectomy for which no lesion has been identified (17) and often predicts lower risk of postsurgical memory decline (18). Thus, HS may be the major factor linking the presence of three beneficial outcomes to left temporal lobectomy: 1) seizure freedom, 2) minimal change in verbal memory or naming, and 3) satisfactory quality of life (19,20). Results of the current study may underlie this favorable constellation.
