Abstract
Commentary
Many topics are rendered less intriguing by involuntary, early exposure. It is possible that for many neuroscientists the sodium channel could be included in this category. Qualitative treatments of Hodgkin and Huxley analysis of the sodium currents underlying the action potential in squid giant axon are found in introductory texts and universally taught, just following explanations of the Nernst equation and the resting membrane potential (1). Although useful for introducing many essential concepts, this early positioning forces shortcuts and simplifications. Information on the s4 positive charge-bearing helical voltage sensor, voltage-dependent opening (activation), and closing (deactivation) is taught, as is how the channels rapidly enter an inactivated state that prevents reopening. Indeed, this process of inactivation and the associated refractory period ensures the unidirectional flow of the nerve impulse. Pedagogy that emphasizes the reliable, uniform, all-or-none aspects of sodium channel function during nondecremental propagation of action potentials leaves them seeming a little bland. The new studies reviewed here describe sodium channels that behave in unexpected and perplexing ways. Although confusing, these findings hold the potential for provoking broader interest in these seemingly well-known channels.
Over the past 15 years, mutations in genes encoding several skeletal muscle, cardiac, and nerve sodium channel subunits have been identified in patients with disorders characterized by paroxysmal hyperexcitability, including forms of periodic paralysis, hereditary ventricular arrhythmia, and epilepsy (2). Electrophysiological analysis in heterologous cells has revealed that many of the disease-provoking mutant channels increase channel openings, sometimes by enhanced activation but most commonly by causing abnormally delayed and/or incomplete inactivation. These observations fit with the view that sodium channels in mammalian excitable cells, as in squid axon, must function in a uniform way and that even slight excesses above the normal activity level could lead to symptomatic hyperexcitability (3).
As the number of known epilepsy-linked sodium channel mutations has grown and the spectrum of associated syndromes has broadened (see Stafstrom Basic Review in this issue), it has become clear that the model of how channel dysfunction can lead to epilepsy is oversimplified. Alekov et al. showed that an epilepsy mutation could be associated with enhanced inactivation predicted to result in a decrease in sodium channel currents (4). Most dramatically, a large number of frame-shift mutations expected to result in truncated, nonconducting channel proteins have been found in cases of severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (SMEI) (2). How can mutations that increase and decrease the activity in the same channel lead to epilepsy syndromes of variable but overlapping severity, from mild (simple febrile seizures) to catastrophic (SMEI)?
The current papers highlight this nettlesome issue through rigorous biophysical study of additional mutations in SCN1A, encoding the channel subunit Nav1.1. The R859C mutant channels described by Barela and Waddy et al. require greater membrane depolarization for activation than the wild type, a change predicted to reduce currents in vivo. The eight mutants analyzed by Rhodes et al. include two that fail to form functional channels; the others exhibit quite heterogeneous changes in properties. Vanoye et al. use elegant single-channel recordings to define the kinetic changes underlying the behavior of two mutations involving neighboring residues on the same transmembrane segment of Nav1.1. Consistent with previous whole-cell patch-clamp studies of the mutations, one increases openings, reflecting a defect in inactivation gating, while the other shows normal opening and closing kinetics but a lowered total number of functional numbers.
Although reductive approaches of this kind are invaluable, the contribution of an ion channel to behavior can only be discerned once its functional profile is understood at several levels—molecular, subcellular, cellular, and neuronal network. Given its importance, it is surprising how little is known about the cell biology of neuronal Nav1.1. Unlike in skeletal muscle and heart where a single type of sodium channel predominates, in brain, individual neurons simultaneously express multiple varieties of sodium channels (5). The classic role of initiation and propagation of action potentials in axons is mainly the responsibility of Nav1.6 (and in some instances Nav1.2), channels that so far only rarely have been implicated in human epilepsy (6). Nav1.1 (encoded by SCN1A, for which over 100 human epilepsy mutations are known) appears to be expressed at low-to-moderate densities but not typically on axons. Instead, Nav1.1 appears to contribute to the excitability of neuronal somata and dendrites, helping to shape excitatory postsynaptic potentials and supporting the backpropagation of action potentials into dendrites; however, the specific in vivo functional profile of Nav1.1 needs to be far better understood.
Much can by learned by combining molecular, cell biological, and electrophysiological approaches to analyze function of mutant neuronal channels in vivo. For example, one of the mysteries regarding benign familial neonatal seizures (BFNS) has been that the mutations in KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 potassium channel subunits, which cause the disorder, often have very little effect on channel function when expressed in cell lines or Xenopus oocytes (7). New work suggests that these channels have previously unsuspected roles on axons and that some of the BFNS mutants are transported quite inefficiently to their proper axonal targets (8,9). A way in which a sodium channel loss-of-function mutation could lead to hyperexcitability in a neuronal circuit is illuminated by other recent studies involving Nav1.1 knockout mice (10). Hippocampal inhibitory neurons from the mutants (but not excitatory pyramidal cells) show a dramatic reduction in detectable sodium channel current, suggesting that seizures in these mice could result from a loss of inhibition in cortical circuits. The inhibitory neurons also show a remarkable compensatory increase in expression of Nav1.3, a sodium channel isoform with biophysical properties quite different from the missing Nav1.1 channels. Further analysis of these mutant mice and of mice bearing missense mutations associated with human epilepsy may answer the unsettled questions about Nav1.1 raised by the current papers. Along the way, investigators will likely have to discard the simplified notion that the function of sodium channels in the neurons is restricted to faithfully “reporting out” the decisions made by synapses—instead, these channels may well be found in the thick of the action.
