This article investigates the role of expert knowledge in integration policy-making in the case of Sweden and Denmark. The two countries have developed very different integration policies and therefore provide an interesting comparison of the research–policy nexus. It is argued that social scientists play a role in the construction of policy narratives, but that their role can be very different. In Sweden, social scientists have been influential in agenda-setting and conceptual rethinking of immigrant integration policies. In Denmark social science research has been utilised in a more selective ‘pick-and-choose’ manner to legitimate government policies.
ÅlundA. and SchierupC. (1991) Paradoxes of Multiculturalism (Aldershot: Avebury).
2.
AMID (2002) Integrationsforskningen I Danmark 1980–2002 (København: Ministeriet for flygtninge, indvandrere og integration).
3.
BerghA. and ErlingssonG. (2009) ‘Liberalization without retrenchment: Understanding the consensus on Swedish welfare state reforms’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 32:1, 71–93.
4.
BoswellC. (2008) ‘The political functions of expert knowledge: Knowledge and legitimation in European Union immigration policy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 15:4, 471–488.
5.
BrekkeJ. and BorchgrevinkT. (2007) Talking about Integration: Discources, Alliances and Theories on Labour Market Integration in Sweden. Institute for Social Research: Report 2007: 9.
6.
BrintS. (1994) In an Age of Experts: The Changing Role of Professionals in Politics and Public Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Goul AndersenJ. (2006) ‘Immigration and the legitimacy of the Scandinavian welfare state: Some preliminary Danish findings’, AMID Working Paper Series 53/2006.
9.
HammarT. (1980) ‘Immigration research in Sweden’, International Migration Review, 14:1, 93–115.
10.
HammarT. (2003) ‘Migration and refugee studies: Reflections about the field's political impact and university status’, in DoomernikJ. and KnippenbergH. (eds), Migration and Migrants: Between Policy and Reality (Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis), 9–18.
11.
HoppeR. (2005) ‘Rethinking the science–policy nexus: From knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements’, Poiesis & Praxis, 3, 199–215.
12.
JørgensenM. B. (2009) National and Transnational Identities: Turkish Organising Processes and Identity construction in Denmark, Sweden and Germany (AMID/SPIRIT: Aalborg University, Ph.D. thesis, unpublished).
13.
LoftagerJ. (1987) Policy-analyse—Svaret på den politiske videnskabs tragedie? (Århus: Institut for Statskundskab).
14.
LundqvistÅ. (2008) ‘Family policy between science and politics’, in MelbyK.RavnA. and WetterbergC. (eds), Gender Equality and Welfare Politics in Scandinavia (Bristol: The Policy Press), 85–100.
15.
(OECD) (2005) Trends in International Migration: Annual Report 2004 Edition (Paris: OECD).
16.
RasmussenH. K. (2007) ‘Fjern 24 års-reglen’, Information, 1 November.
17.
Regeringen (2005) En ny Chance til alle: Regeringens Integrationsplan (København: Ministeriet for flygtninge, indvandrere og integration).
18.
Regeringens Proposition (1997/98) Regeringens Proposition 1997/98:16, ‘Sverige, framtiden och mångfalden—från invandrerpolitik till integrationspolitik’.
19.
RicciD. (1984) The Tragedy of Political Science (New Haven: Yale University Press).
20.
Riksrevisionen (2005) Från invandrarpolitik till invandrarpolitik, RiR2005:5.
21.
RomanC. (2008) ‘Academic discourse, social policy and the construction of new families’, in MelbyK.RavnA. and WetterbergC. (eds), Gender Equality and Welfare Politics in Scandinavia (Bristol: The Policy Press), 101–118.
22.
SchierupC-U.HansenP. and CastlesS. (2006) Migration, Citizenship, and the European Welfare State: A European Dilemma (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
23.
SchmidtV. (2008) ‘Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse’, Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.
24.
SNS (2002) Arbete? Var god dröj! (Stockholm: SNS Förlag).
25.
SoininenM. (1999) ‘The “Swedish model” as an institutional framework for immigrant membership rights’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 25:4, 685–702.
26.
SOU (2005) 56: Det blågula glashuset—strukturell diskriminering i Sverige.
27.
SOU (2006) 79: Integrationens svarta bok. Agenda för jämlikhet och social sammanhållning.
28.
StoneD. A. (1988) Policy Paradox and Political Reason (New York: HarperCollins).
29.
Tænketanken (2001) Udlændinges integration i det danske samfund—Tænketanken om udfordringer for integrationsindsatsen i Danmark (København: Indenrigsministeriet).
