National governments in Europe are increasingly resorting to civic integration policies in the search for solutions to modern integration problems. These policies are intended to improve the knowledge of national language and society among the immigrant population. Increasingly, however, and due to their mandatory nature, these policies have a direct impact on the legal, social and cultural position of immigrants. Passing a language test appears to be an essential prerequisite in order to enter a country, acquire a more secure residence status, and become eligible for naturalisation. The social dimension of integration seems to be more carefully dealt with, since the civic integration measures generally aim at increasing participation in society. The results so far, however, do not suggest highly optimistic conclusions. The cultural dimension is not left untouched either, since integration courses increasingly insist on social and cultural incorporation. As will be discussed in more detail for the Netherlands, the establishment of civic integration policies has abruptly ended the period of multiculturalism, and has had serious consequences for the position of immigrants in Dutch society.
ApapJ. (2006), ‘The Relationship between Integration and Citizenship’, in CarreraS. (ed.), The Nexus between Immigration, Integration and Citizenship in the EU, Collective Conference, April, Brussels, Centre for European Policy Studies.
2.
BroedersD. (2002), ‘Immigratie in Nederland. Normaliseren door differentiëren?’, in Grenzeloze Solidariteit. Naar een migratiebestendige verzorgingsstaat, Amsterdam, de Balie.
3.
CarreraS. (2006), ‘A Typology of Different Integration Programmes in the EU’, Briefing Paper, No. IP/2005-167, Brussels, Centre for European Policy Studies.
4.
CastlesS. (1998), ‘Globalization and the Ambiguities of National Citizenship’, in BauböckR. and RundellJ. (eds.), Blurred Boundaries: Migration, Ethnicity, Citizenship, Vienna, European Centre.
5.
CastlesS. and DavidsonA. (2000), Citizenship and Migration: Globalization and the Politics of Belonging, London, Macmillan.
6.
Council of the European Union (2004), Press release, 2618th Council Meeting, Justice and Home Affairs, Brussels, 14615/04.
7.
Dutch Central Statistics (2007), Stateline Database, Population on 1 January by nationality, age and sex (reference period: 1996–2007), Official website of Dutch Central Statistics.
8.
Dutch Parliamentary Commission (2004), Bruggen Bouwen – Eindrapport, Den Haag, Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal, nr. 28 689.
9.
EntzingerH. (2004), ‘Integration and Orientation Courses in a European Perspective’, Expert Report prepared for the Sachsverständigenrat für Zuwanderung und Integration, Rotterdam, ERCOMER.
10.
EntzingerH. and BiezeveldR. (2003), ‘Benchmarking in Immigrant Integration’, Report prepared for the European Commission, Rotterdam, Erasmus University.
11.
European Commission (2005), Study on Immigration, Integration and Social Cohesion, Focus Consultancy Ltd/Erasmus University Rotterdam, EC/DG Employment and Social Affairs. Contract VC/2004/0171.
12.
FerminA. (2000), ‘Burgerschap en integratiebeleid’, Rapport voor het Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties, Utrecht, Faculteit Sociale Wetenschappen.
13.
GeddesA. (2003), ‘Migration and the Welfare State in Europe’, Political Quarterly, 74, Supplement 1, pp. 150–162.
14.
GroenendijkK. (2004), ‘Legal Concepts of Integration in EU Migration Law’, European Journal of Migration and Law, 6(2), pp. 111–126.
15.
GroenendijkK. (2005), ‘Integratie en uitsluiting in het Nederlandse vreemdelingenrecht’, in BoelesP. and LodderG. (eds.), Integratie en uitsluiting, Den Haag, Sdu uitgevers.
16.
de GrootG.R. (2006), ‘Reflexions on Integration and Access to Nationality through Naturalisation’, in CarreraS. (ed.), The Nexus between Immigration, Integration and Citizenship in the EU, Collective Conference, April, Brussels, Centre for European Policy Studies.
17.
JoppkeC. (2007), ‘Immigrants and Civic Integration in Western Europe’, in BantingK. (eds.), The Art of the State III: Belonging? Diversity, Recognition and Shared Citizenship in Canada, Montreal, Institute for Research on Public Policy.
18.
KlaverJ. and OdéA. (2007), ‘Inburgering in Nederland’, in Jaarrapport Integratie 2007, Den Haag, SCP/CBS/WODC.
19.
KoopmansR. (2002), ‘Zachte heelmeesters. Een vergelijking van de resultaten van de Nederlandse en Duitse integratiebeleid en wat de WRR daaruit niet concludeert’, Migrantenstudies, 18(2), pp. 87–92.
20.
KymlickaW. (1995), Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
21.
MarshallT.H. (1963), ‘Citizenship and Social Class’, in Sociology at the Crossroads, London, Heinemann, reprinted in ShafirG. (ed.) (1998), The Citizenship Debates. A Reader, Minneapolis and London, University of Minnesota Press.
22.
MichalowskiI. (2005), ‘Integration Requirements in the European Member States’, in BoelesP. and LodderG. (eds.), Integratie en uitsluiting, Den Haag, Sdu Uitgevers.
23.
NiessenJ. (2000), Diversity and Cohesion: New challenges for the integration of immigrants and minorities, Strasbourg, Council of Europe.
24.
OdéA.W.M. and BrinkM. (2002), ‘Verscheidenheid in integratie. Evaluatie van de Wet inburgering nieuwkomers’, Migrantenrecht, 2(5), pp. 154–158.
25.
OECD (2005), Trends in International Migration2004, Paris, OECD.
26.
PenninxR. (2004), ‘Integration Policies for Europe's Immigrants: Performance, conditions and challenges’, Expert Paper for the Sachverstandingenrat fur Zuwanderung und Integration.
27.
SpijkerboerT. (2007), Zeker weten: Inburgering en de fundamenten van het Nederlandse politieke bestel, Den Haag, Sdu Uitgevers.
28.
VermeulenB. (2007), ‘Uitgangspunten en randvoorwaarden inzake recente en toekomstige ontwikkelingen op het terrein van het vreemdelingen-, integratieen onderwijsbeleid’, Nederland migratiesamenleving 2025, Den Haag, Adviescommissie voor Vreemdelingenzaken.
29.
VonkG.J. (2001), ‘Migration, Social Security and the Law, Some European Dilemmas’, European Journal of Social Security, 3(4), pp. 315–332.
30.
WeilP. (2001), ‘Access to Citizenship: A comparison of twenty five nationality laws’, in AleinikoffT. and KlusmeyerD. (eds.), Citizenship Today: Global Perspectives and Practices, Washington DC, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
