For many decades, the focus of personnel selection research was on developing selection tests that maximized prediction of job performance; the approach was typically lacking in theoretical bases. The past two decades saw significant shifts in research to a focus on the nature of constructs and their interrelationships, characterized by an approach that emphasizes theoretical understanding of the phenomena under investigation. This article provides an overview of how a construct-oriented approach underlies major current directions in scientific research on personnel selection. Emerging trends that are likely to constitute issues of enduring importance are discussed.
BormanW.C.MotowidloS.J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In SchmittN.BormanW.C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
CampbellJ.P.McCloyR.A.OpplerS.H.SagerC.E. (1993). A theory of performance. In SchmittN.BormanW.C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
ChanD. (1998). The conceptualization of change over time: An integrative approach incorporating longitudinal means and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organizational Research Methods, 1, 421–483.
6.
ChanD. (2000). Understanding adaptation to changes in the work environment: Integrating individual difference and learning perspectives. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 18, 1–42.
7.
ChanD. (2005). Multilevel research. In LeongF.AustinJ. (Eds.), The psychology research handbook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
ChanD.SchmittN. (1997). Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: Subgroup differences in performance and face validity perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 143–159.
9.
ChanD.SchmittN. (2004). An agenda for future research on applicant reactions to selection procedures: A construct-oriented approach. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 9–23.
PulakosE.DAradS.DonovanM.A.PlamondonK.E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 612–624.
12.
SackettP.R. (2002). The structure of counterproductive work behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 5–11.
13.
SchmittN.ClauseC.S.PulakosE.D. (1996). Subgroup differences associated with different measures of some common job-relevant constructs. In CooperC.R.RobertsonI.T. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 115–140). New York: John Wiley.
14.
TeslukP.E.JacobsR.R. (1998). Toward an integrated model of work experience. Personnel Psychology, 51, 321–356.
