Based on a dataset of candidates from 488 party lists for Belgian lower house elections in the period 1987–2010, this contribution analyses the effects of electoral system-related and party-related determinants on the level of geographical representation on party lists. The results show that decentralised candidate selection methods lead to higher levels of geographical representation on the list in its entirety. With regard to realistic slots, it is found that the percentage of female candidates is negatively associated with geographical representation. Additionally, in districts where the largest city is dominant in terms of population size, it is more difficult for selectorates to realise geographical balance.
BirchA. (1993) Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy, London: Routledge.
2.
CaramaniD.CelisK.WautersB. (2014) ‘Representation of Old and New Groups, Old and New Cleavages’ in DeschouwerK.DepauwS. (eds.), Representing the People: A Survey among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 39–65.
3.
CareyJ.ShugartM. (1995) ‘Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas’, Electoral Studies14(4), pp. 417–439.
4.
CrispB.JensenK.ShomerY. (2007) ‘Magnitude and Vote Seeking’, Electoral Studies26(4), pp. 727–734.
5.
CrispB.OlivellaS.MaleckiM.SherM. (2013) ‘Vote-Earning Strategies in Flexible List Systems: Seats at the Price of Unity’, Electoral Studies32(4), pp. 658–669.
6.
DahlerupD. (2013) Women, Quotas and Politics, London: Routledge.
7.
De WinterL. (1988) ‘Belgium: Democracy or Oligarchy?’ in GallagherM.MarshM. (eds.), The Secret Garden of Politics: Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective, London: Sage, pp. 20–46.
8.
DeschouwerK. (1993) Organiseren of Bewegen? De Evolutie Van De Belgische Partijstructuren Sinds 1960, Brussels: VUB Press.
9.
DeschouwerK.RihouxB. (2008) ‘De Lokale Partijafdelingen van Hiërarchie naar Stratarchie’ in BuelensJ.RihouxB.DeschouwerK. (eds.), Tussen Kiezer en Hoofdkwartier: de Lokale Partijafdelingen en Gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van 2006, Brussels: VUB Press, pp. 19–30.
10.
GallagherM.MarshM. (eds.) (1988) The Secret Garden of Politics: Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective, London: Sage.
11.
HazanR. (1997) ‘The 1996 Intra-Party Elections in Israel: Adopting Party Primaries’, Electoral Studies16(1), pp. 95–103.
12.
HazanR.RahatG. (2010) Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
HolmstenS.MoserR.SlosarM. (2010) ‘Do Ethnic Parties Exclude Women?’, Comparative Political Studies43(10), pp. 1179–1201.
14.
HtunM. (2004) ‘Is Gender Like Ethnicity? The Political Representation of Identity Groups’, Perspectives on Politics2(3), pp. 439–458.
15.
KernellG. (2008) ‘Political Party Organizations and Representation: Party Responsiveness, Candidate Heterogeneity and Voter Behavior in Mature Parliamentary Democracies.’ Unpublished PhD Thesis, Colombia University.
16.
KooleR.LeijenaarM. (1988) ‘The Netherlands: The Predominance of Regionalism’ in GallagherM.MarshM. (eds.), The Secret Garden of Politics: Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective, London: Sage, pp. 190–209.
17.
LatnerM.McGannA. (2005) ‘Geographical Representation under Proportional Representation: The Cases of Israel and the Netherlands’, Electoral Studies24(4), pp. 709–734.
18.
LijphartA. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Democracies, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
LovenduskiJ.NorrisP. (1993) Gender and Party Politics, London: Sage.
20.
MaddensB.PutG.J.SmuldersJ. (2014) Het DNA van de kandidaten, Leuven: Acco.
21.
MatlandR. (1993) ‘Institutional Variables Affecting Female Representation in National Legislatures: The Case of Norway’, Journal of Politics55(3), pp. 737–755.
22.
MatlandR. (2005) ‘Enhancing Women’s Political Participation: Legislative Recruitment and Electoral Systems’ in KaramA. (ed.), Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, Stockholm: IDEA, pp. 93–111.
23.
MatlandR.StudlarD. (1996) ‘The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single-Member District and Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Canada and Norway’, Journal of Politics58(3), pp. 707–733.
24.
MillerJ.KrosnickJ. (1998) ‘The Impact of Candidate Name Order on Election Outcomes’, Public Opinion Quarterly62(3), pp. 291–330.
25.
NorrisP. (1997) Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
NorrisP. (2004) Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
NorrisP. (2006) ‘The Impact of Electoral Reform on Women’s Representation’, Acta Politica41(2), pp. 197–213.
28.
PiletJ.B. (2007) Changer Pour Gagner? Les Réformes des Lois Electorales en Belgique, Bruxelles: ULB.
29.
PitkinH. (1967) The Concept of Representation, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30.
PutG.J.MaddensB. (2013) ‘The Selection of Candidates for Eligible Positions on PR Lists: The Belgian/Flemish Federal Elections, 1999–2010’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties23(1), pp. 49–65.
31.
PutG.J.MaddensB. (2014) ‘The Effect of Municipality Size and Local Office on the Electoral Success of Belgian/Flemish Election Candidates: A Multilevel Analysis’, Government and Opposition, published online.
32.
RahatG.HazanR. (2001) ‘Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework’, Party Politics7(3), pp. 297–322.
33.
RahatG.HazanR.KatzR. (2008) ‘Democracy and Political Parties: On the Uneasy Relationships between Participation, Competition and Representation’, Party Politics14(6), pp. 663–683.
34.
RahatG.MalkaR. (2012) ‘Political Representation in Israel: Minority Sectors vs. Women’, Representation48(3), pp. 307–319.
35.
RuedinD. (2010) ‘The Relationship between Levels of Gender and Ethnic Group Representation’, Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism10(1), pp. 92–106.
36.
ShomerY. (2009) ‘Candidate Selection Procedures, Seniority and Vote-Seeking Behavior’, Comparative Political Studies42(7), pp. 945–970.
37.
ShomerY. (2014) ‘What Affects Candidate Selection Processes? A Cross-National Examination’, Party Politics20(4), pp. 533–546.
38.
ShugartM. (2005) ‘Comparative Electoral Systems Research: The Maturation of a Field and New Challenges Ahead’ in GallagherM.MitchellP. (eds.), The Politics of Electoral Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–55.
39.
SpiesD.KaiserA. (2014) ‘Does the Mode of Candidate Selection Affect the Representativeness of Parties?’, Party Politics20(4), pp. 576–590.
40.
TaageperaR. (1994) ‘Beating the Law of Minority Attrition’ in ZimmermanW.ZimmermanJ. (eds.), Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, pp. 235–245.
41.
TavitsM. (2010) ‘Effect of Local Ties on Electoral Success and Parliamentary Behavior: The Case of Estonia’, Party Politics16(2), pp. 215–235.
42.
TremblayM. (2012) Women and Legislative Representation: Electoral Systems, Political Parties and Sex Quotas, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
43.
ValdiniM. (2012) ‘A Deterrent to Diversity: The Conditional Effect of Electoral Rules on the Nomination of Women Candidates’, Electoral Studies31(4), pp. 740–749.
44.
VandeleeneA.De WinterL.MeulewaeterC.BaudewynsP. (2013) ‘Candidate Selection: Explorations beyond the Secret Garden of Politics – The Case of Belgium’. Paper presented at the 12th Dutch-Belgian Political Science Conference, 30–31 May.
45.
VerledenF. (2013) ‘De Toegang tot de Parlementaire Elite: Politieke Rekrutering en Lijstvorming in België in Historisch Perspectief.’ Paper Presented at the 12th Dutch-Belgian Political Science Conference, 30–31 May.
46.
WautersB.WeekersK.PiletJ. (2004) ‘Het Gebruik van de Voorkeurstem bij de Regionale en Europese Parlementsverkiezingen van 13 Juni 2004’, Res Publica46(2–3), pp. 377–412.
47.
YoungL. (1994) Electoral Systems and Representative Legislatures: Consideration of Alternative Electoral Systems, Ottawa: Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women.
