A higher candidate turnover among women may be one of the reasons why quota rules seldom succeed in attaining full legislative parity. This proposition is tested on the basis of a longitudinal analysis of 11,678 candidates for legislative elections during the period 1987–2019 in the Flemish region of Belgium. It is shown that male candidates have shorter careers than women, contrary to expectations. The duration of the career as a candidate depends on the electoral performance, but only for men. In the long run, the introduction of a strict quota rule prolongs the candidate careers of both men and women, but the effect for women is much stronger. This finding contradicts the allegation that quota lead to an influx of unmotivated women candidates with a high turnover.
AllenPCuttsD (2020) Personality and the gender gap in political ambition. European Journal of Politics and Gender3(1): 11–32.
2.
AndréADepauwSShugartMS, et al. (2017) Party nomination strategies in flexible-list systems: Do preference votes matter?Party Politics23(5): 589–600.
3.
BarneaSRahatG (2011) Out with the old, in with the “new”: What constitutes a new party?Party Politics17(3): 303–320.
4.
BernsteinRA (1986) Why are there so few women in the house?The Western Political Quarterly39(1): 155–164.
5.
BlondelJ (1985) Government Ministers in the Contemporary World. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
6.
ButlerDMPreeceJR (2016) Recruitment and perceptions of gender bias in party leader support. Political Research Quarterly69(4): 842–851.
7.
CarsonJLRobertsJM (2005) Strategic politicians and US House elections, 1874–1914. The Journal of Politics67(2): 474–496.
8.
ChengCTavitsM (2011) Informal influences in selecting female political candidates. Political Research Quarterly64(2): 460–471.
9.
CofféH (2013) Women stay local, men go national and global? Gender differences in political interest. Sex Roles69 (5–6): 323–338.
10.
CofféHBolzendahlC (2017) Avoiding the subject? Gender gaps in interpersonal political conflict avoidance and its consequences for political engagement. British Politics12(2): 135–156.
11.
DahlMNyrupJ (2020) Confident and cautious candidates: explaining under-representation of women in Danish municipal politics. European Journal of Political Research. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12396.
DahlerupDFreidenvallL (2005) Quotas as a “fast track” to equal representation for women: Why Scandinavia is no longer the model. International Feminist Journal of Politics7(1): 26–48.
14.
Davidson-SchmichL (2016) Gender Quotas and Democratic Participation: Recruiting Candidates for Elective Offices in Germany. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
15.
EriksonJJosefssonC (2019) The legislature as a gendered workplace: exploring members of parliament’s experiences of working in the Swedish parliament. International Political Science Review40(2): 197–214.
16.
FernándezJJJaime-CastilloAMMayrlD (2021) Societal religiosity and the gender gap in political interest, 1990–2014. British Journal of Sociology72: 252–269.
17.
Fortin-RittbergerJEderC (2013) Towards a gender-equal Bundestag? The impact of electoral rules on women’s representation. West European Politics36(5): 969–985.
18.
FranceschetSKrookMLPiscopoJM (2012) The impact of gender quotas. In: DahlerupD (ed), The Impact of Gender Quotas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
GoldenMAPicciL (2015) Incumbency effects under proportional representation: leaders and backbenchers in the postwar Italian chambers of deputies. Legislative Studies Quarterly4(40): 509–538.
20.
GóreckiMAKukołowiczP (2014) Gender quotas, candidate background and the election of women: a paradox of gender quotas in open-list proportional representation systems. Electoral Studies36: 65–80.
21.
GouglasAMaddensBBransM (2017) Determinants of legislative turnover in Western Europe, 1945–2015. European Journal of Political Research57(3): 637–661.
22.
HazanRRahatG (2010) Democracy Within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
HoboltSBHøylandB (2011) Selection and sanctioning in European parliamentary elections. British Journal of Political Science41(3): 477–498.
24.
HoxJJMoerbeekMvan de SchootR (2018) Multilevel Analysis. Techniques and Applications. London: Routledge.
25.
InglehartRNorrisP (2005) Modernization and gender equality: a response to Adams and Orloff. Politics & Gender1(3): 482–492.
26.
JacobsonGC (1989) Strategic politicians and the dynamics of US House elections, 1946–86. American Political Science Review83(3): 773–793.
27.
JacobsonGCSamuelK (1983) Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
KanthakKWoonJ (2015) Women don’t run? Election aversion and candidate entry. American Journal of Political Science59(3): 595–612.
29.
KrookML (2010) Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
KrookMLNorrisP (2014) Beyond quotas: strategies to promote gender equality in elected office. Political Studies62(1): 2–20.
31.
LawlessJLFoxRL (2010) It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32.
LuhisteM (2015) Party gatekeepers’ support for viable female candidacy in PR-list systems. Politics & Gender11(1): 89–116.
33.
MaddensBPutGJSmuldersJ (2014) Het DNA van de Kandidaten. Een Doorlichting van de Kandidaten Voor de Kamerverkiezingen van 1987 tot 2010. Leuven: Acco Uitgeverij.
34.
MarinoBDiodatiNMVerzichelliL (2018) From leaders to personalities? Evidence from an expert survey on personalisation of politics in Western Europe (1985–2016). Circap Occational Papares4: 1–41.
35.
MartínezIComaFLagoI (2021) “Sacrifical lambs” or candidate mimicking? Gender-based nomination strategies in elections. Party Politics, Online First.
36.
MatlandRE (2006) Electoral quotas: frequency and effectiveness. In: DahlerupD (ed), Women, Quotas, Politics. London: Routledge.
37.
MatlandREStudlarDT (2004) Determinants of legislative turnover: a cross-national analysis. British Journal of Political Science34(1): 87–108.
38.
MazurAGLépinardEDurovicA, et al. (2020) Party penalties for parity: less than meets the eye. French Politics18: 28–49.
39.
MeierP (2012) From laggard to leader: explaining the Belgian gender quotas and parity clause. West European Politics35(2): 362–379.
40.
MeserveSAPemsteinDBernhardWT (2018) Gender, incumbency and party list nominations. British Journal of Political Science50(1): 1–15.
41.
Moss-RacusinCARudmanLA (2010) Disruptions in women’s self-promotion: the backlash avoidance model. Psychology of Women Quarterly34(2): 186–202.
42.
MurrayR (2004) Why didn’t parity work? A closer examination of the 2002 election results. French Politics2(3): 347–362.
43.
NorrisP (2004) Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
NorrisPLovenduskiJ (1995) Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
PaxtonPKunovichSHughesMM (2007) Gender in politics. Annual Review of Sociology33: 263–284.
46.
PiscopoJMKerryM (2020) Rethinking the ambition gap. Gender and candidate emergence in comparative perspective. European Journal of Politics and Gender3 (1): 3–10.
47.
PreeceJStoddardO (2015) Why women don’t run: experimental evidence on gender differences in political competition aversion. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization117: 296–308.
48.
PutGJMaddensB (2013) The selection of candidates for eligible positions on PR lists: the Belgian/Flemish federal elections 1999–2010. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties23(1): 49–65.
49.
PutGJGouglasAMaddensB (2015) Candidate selection, intraparty competition and incumbency turnover: analysis of the Belgian lower house elections. MPSA Conference Paper2015: 1–30.
50.
RudmanLA (1998) Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74(3): 629–645.
51.
Schwindt-BayerLA (2009) Making quotas work: the effect of gender quotas laws on the election of women. Legislative Studies Quarterly34(1): 5–28.
52.
ThomasMBodetMA (2013) Sacrificial lambs, women candidates, and district competitiveness in Canada. Electoral Studies32(1): 153–166.
53.
TrippAMKangA (2008) The global impact of quotas: on the fast track to increased female legislative representation. Comparative Political Studies41(3): 338–361.
54.
WautersBMaddensBPutGJ (2014) It takes time: the long-term effects of gender quotas. Representation50(2): 143–159.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
