In the aftermath of the recent economic crisis, scholarly discussions on the relationship between human rights, budgeting and budgets have been re-energised. This article focuses on the design of governing institutions in the context of public budgeting. More specifically, it introduces three institutional virtues, each of which can serve a facilitative function in the drafting of ‘human rights compatible budgets’ (i.e. budgets that take human rights obligations adequately into consideration). These institutional virtues are: instrumental deliberation, interpretative deliberation and evaluative deliberation.
AlexyR. (2005) ‘Balancing, Constitutional Review and Representation’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 3 (4), 572–581.
2.
BalakrishnanR.ElsonD. (2008) ‘Auditing Economic Policy in the Light of Obligations on Economic and Social Rights’, Essex Human Rights Review, 5 (1), 1–19.
3.
BalakrishnanR.ElsonD. (2011) ‘Introduction: Economic Policies and Human Rights Obligations’, in BalakrishnanR.ElsonD. (eds), Economic Policy and Human Rights: Holding Governments to Account. London: Zed Books, pp. 1–27.
4.
BalakrishnanR.ElsonD.HeintzJ.LucianiN. (2011) Maximum Available Resources and Human Rights. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Women’s Global Leadership.
5.
BlybergA. (2009) ‘The Case of Mislaid Allocation’, Sur, 6 (11), 123–138.
BuchananA. (2010) Human Rights, Legitimacy, and the Use of Force. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
DonnellyJ. (2003) Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9.
DryzekJ. S. (2010) Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
DworkinR. (1996) Freedom’s Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
ElsonD. (2004) ‘Engendering Government Budgets in the Context of Globalization(s)’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 6 (4), 623–642.
12.
ElsonD. (2012) ‘The Reduction of the UK Budget Deficit: A Human Rights Perspective’, International Review of Applied Economics, 26 (2), 177–190.
13.
ElsonD.NortonA. (2002) What’s Behind the Budget?London: Overseas Development Institute.
14.
ElsonD.BalakrishnanR.HeintzJ. (2013) ‘Public Finance, Maximum Available Resources and Human Rights’, in NolanA.O’ConnellR.HarveyC. (eds), Human Rights and Public Finance. Oxford: Hart, pp. 1–53.
15.
FerreiraN. (2012) ‘Feasibility Constraints and the South African Bill of Rights’, South African Law Journal, 129 (2), 274–302.
16.
FozzardA. (2001) The Basic Budgeting Problem. London: Overseas Development Institute.
17.
FredmanS. (2008) Human Rights Transformed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
FredmanS. (2013) ‘Adjudication as Accountability’, in BamforthN.LaylandP. (eds), Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–123.
19.
FullerL. (1978) ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication’, Harvard Law Review, 92 (2), 353–409.
20.
GoldfrankB. (2007) ‘Lessons from Latin America’s Experience with Participatory Budgeting’, in ShahA. (ed.), Participatory Budgeting. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 91–126.
21.
GoodinR. (1996) ‘Institutions and Their Design’, in GoodinR. (ed.), The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Press Syndicate, pp. 1–53.
22.
GriffinJ. (2008) On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
GuessG. M.LeloupL. T. (2010) Comparative Public Budgeting. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
24.
GutmannA. (2004) Why Deliberative Democracy?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
HarrisonJ.StephensonM. (2013) ‘Human Rights, Equality and Public Spending’, in NolanA.O’ConnellR.HarveyC. (eds), Human Rights and Public Finance. Oxford: Hart, pp. 219–241.
26.
HoffmanD. (2011) The Oligarchs: Wealth and Power in the New Russia. New York: PublicAffairs.
27.
HolmesS.SunsteinC. R. (1999) The Cost of Rights. New York: W.W. Norton.
28.
KoskenniemiM. (2010) ‘Human Rights Mainstreaming as a Strategy for Institutional Power’, Humanity, 1 (1), 47–58.
29.
LiebenbergS. (2001) ‘The Right to Social Assistance: The Implications of Grootboom for Policy Reform in South Africa’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 17, 232–257.
30.
LiebenbergS. (2008) ‘Adjudication of Social Rights under a Transformative Constitution’, in LangfordM. (ed.), Social Rights Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 75–101.
31.
McCruddenC. (2005) ‘Mainstreaming and Human Rights’, in HarveyC. (ed.), Human Rights in the Community. Oxford: Hart, pp. 9–28.
32.
NolanA.LusianiN. J.CourtisS. (2014) ‘Two Steps Forward, No Steps Back?’, in NolanA. (ed.), Economic and Social Rights after the Global Financial Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–145.
33.
O’ConnellP. (2013) ‘Let Them Eat Cake: Socio-Economic Rights in an Age of Austerity’, in NolanA.O’ConnellR.HarveyC. (eds), Human Rights and Public Finance. Oxford: Hart, pp. 59–76.
34.
O’ConnellR.. (2014) Applying An International Human Rights Framework to State Budget Allocations. Abingdon: Routledge.
35.
OhanyanA. (1999) ‘Negotiation Culture in a Post-Soviet Context’, Mediation Quarterly, 17 (1), 83–104.
36.
RamkumarV.ShapiroI. (2010) Guide to Transparency in Government Budget Reports. Washington, DC: International Budget Partnership.
37.
ReedH.ElsonD.HimmelweitS. (2013) An Adequate Standard of Living: A Child Rights Based Quantitative Analysis of Budgetary Decisions, 2010–2013. London: Office of the Children’s Commissioner.
38.
RooneyE.HarveyC. (2013) ‘Better on the Margins?’, in NolanA.O’ConnellR.HarveyC. (eds), Human Rights and Public Finance. Oxford: Hart, pp. 123–135.
39.
SaizI. (2009) ‘Rights in Recession?’, Journal of Human Rights Practice, 1 (2), 277–293.
40.
SaizI. (2013) ‘Resourcing Rights’, in NolanA.O’ConnellR.HarveyC. (eds), Human Rights and Public Finance. Oxford: Hart, pp. 77–104.
41.
SalomonM.ArnottC. (2014) ‘Better Development Decision-Making: Applying International Human Rights Law to Neoclassical Economics’, Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 32 (1), 44–74.
42.
SepúlvedaM. (2003) The Nature of the Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Cambridge: Intersentia.
43.
SunsteinC. R. (2002) ‘The Law of Group Polarization’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 10 (2), 175–195.
44.
SyrrettK. (2007) Law, Legitimacy and the Rationing of Health Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
TalpinJ. (2011) Schools of Democracy. Colchester: ECPR Press.
