Advances in computer technology have made it possible to customize communication, including health-education materials, to the specific needs and interests of any individual. Studies show that individually tailored health-education materials are more effective than generic materials in promoting changes in a variety of health-related behaviors. Theory and research in information processing provide an explanation for why such materials are effective. This article discusses current research on how individuals process tailored health information, and discusses directions for future research in this area.
BrugJ.GlanzK.VanAssemaP.KokG.Van BreukelenG.J.P. (1998). The impact of computer-tailored feedback and iterative feedback on fat, fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Education and Behavior, 25, 517–531.
2.
BrugJ.SteenhausI.VanAssemaP.DeVriesH. (1996). The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Preventive Medicine, 25, 236–242.
3.
BullF.C.KreuterM.W.ScharffD.P. (1999). Effects of tailored, personalized, and general materials on physical activity. Patient Education and Counseling, 36, 181–192.
4.
CacioppoJ.T.StrathmanA.J.PriesterJ.R. (1994). To think or not to think: Exploring two routes to persuasion. InShavittS.BrockT.C. (Eds.), Persuasion: Psychological insights and perspectives (pp. 113–147). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
5.
CampbellM.K.DeVellisB.M.StrecherV.J.AmmermanA.S.DeVellisR.F.SandlerR.S. (1994). Improving dietary behavior: The effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 783–787.
6.
HoltC.L.ClarkE.M.KreuterM.W.ScharffD.P. (2000). Does locus of control moderate the effects of tailored health education materials?Health Education Research, 15, 393–403.
7.
KreuterM.W.BullF.C.ClarkE.M.OswaldD.L. (1999). Understanding how people process health information: A comparison of tailored and untailored weight loss materials. Health Psychology, 18, 487–494.
8.
KreuterM.W.OswaldD.L.BullF.C.ClarkE.M. (2000). Are tailored health education materials always more effective than non-tailored materials?Health Education Research, 15, 305–316.
9.
KreuterM.W.SkinnerC.S. (2000). Tailoring: What's in a name?Health Education Research, 15, 1–3.
10.
KreuterM.W.StrecherV.J. (1995). Changing inaccurate perceptions of health risk: Results from a randomized trial. Health Psychology, 14, 56–63.
11.
KreuterM.W.StrecherV.J. (1996). Do tailored behavior change messages enhance the effectiveness of health risk appraisal? Results from a randomized trial. Health Education Research, 11, 97–105.
12.
PettyR.T.CacioppoJ.T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches.Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
13.
SkinnerC.S.CampbellM.K.RimerB.K.CurryS.ProchaskaJ.O. (1999). How effective is tailored print communication?Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 290–298.
14.
SkinnerC.S.StrecherV.J.HospersH. (1994). Physician recommendations for mammogra-phy: Do tailored messages make a difference?American Journal of Public Health, 84, 43–49.
15.
StrecherV.J.KreuterM.W.Den BoerD.J.Ko-brinS.HospersH.J.SkinnerC.S. (1994). The effects of computer-tailored smoking cessation messages in family practice settings. Journal of Family Practice, 39, 262–268.
