Infants show an interesting asymmetry in face processing: They are more fluent in processing female faces than they are at processing male faces. We hypothesize that such processing asymmetry results from greater experience with female faces than with male faces early in development. Asymmetrical face processing may have long-lasting implications for development of face recognition, development of knowledge structures regarding females and males, and social-information processing. We encourage researchers to use both female and male faces in their face-perception research and to conduct separate analyses for female and male faces.
QuinnP.C. (2002). Beyond prototypes: Asymmetries in infant categorization and what they teach us about the mechanisms guiding knowledge acquisition. In KailR.ReeseH. (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior: Vol. 29 (pp. 161–193). San Diego: Academic Press.
13.
QuinnP.C.YahrJ.KuhnA.SlaterA.M.PascalisO. (2002). Representation of the gender of human faces by infants: A preference for female. Perception, 31, 1109–1121.
RamseyJ.L.SimmonsR.E. (2005). [Two, 5, 8, and 11 month olds' interactions with familiar and unfamiliar individuals during a typical week]. Unpublished raw data.
16.
RubensteinA.J.KalakanisL.LangloisJ.H. (1999). Infant preferences for attractive faces: A cognitive explanation. Developmental Psychology, 35, 848–855.
17.
SangrigoliS.de SchonenS. (2004). Recognition of own-race and other-race faces by three-month-old infants. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1219–1227.
18.
WinkielmanP.CacioppoJ.T. (2001). Mind at ease puts smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 989–1000.
19.
YoungerB.A.FearingD.D. (1999). Parsing items into separate categories: Developmental change in infant categorization. Child Development, 70, 291–303.
