The Influence of Space Discretization on the Accuracy of Numerical Simulation of Heat and Moisture Transport in Porous Building Materials

Abstract

It is well recognised that the accuracy of numerical solutions for coupled heat and moisture transport problems are highly dependent upon the space discretization regime adopted. While a range of possible space discretization methods are outlined in the literature, most of the commonly available simulation models for heat and moisture transfer through building constructions adopt the oneway expansion method. As part of the process of developing a new simulation model based on the Control Volume technique, the Authors have conducted a range of computer simulations to study the influence of space discretization on modelling results. Comparisons between different space discretization methods are presented which show that the two-way expansion method generally produces the best solution. This method has now been adopted by the Authors and has the advantage of avoiding the need to use extremely fine grids even when modelling complex building structures.

Keywords

numerical model space discretization heat and moisture transfer building materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bear, J. and Corapcioglu, M.Y. (1989). Transport Processes in Porous Media. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Greenkorn, R.A. (1983). Flow Phenomena in Porous Media. New York: Marcel Dekker Incorporation.

Galbraith, G.H. (1992). Heat and mass transfer within porous building materials. PhD Thesis, University of Strathclyde, UK.

Bear, J. and Bachmat, Y. (1991). Introduction to Modelling of Transport Phenomena in Porous Media. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Hirsch, C. (1997). Numerical computation of internal and external flows. Vol. 1: Fundamentals of numerical discretization. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Burch, D.M. (1997). Manual of MOIST – A PC program for predicting heat and moisture transfer in building envelopes (Release 3.0), Building and Fire Research Laboratory, National Research of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

Patankar, S.V. (1980). Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York.

Anderson, J.D. (1995). Computational Fluid Dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Pedersen, C.R. (1990). Combined heat and moisture transfer in building constructions. PhD Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.

10.

Carmeliet, J. (1992). Some critical remarks on the numerical modelling of the coupled heat and vapour transfer by the control volume method, International Energy Agency Annex 24, Vol. 5, Task 1.

11.

Grunewald, J. (1999). Development of a new methodology to analyse the durability of facade repair and retrofitting systems – Full document of the numerical simulation program DIM3.1, Final report, Volume 5, Institute of Building Climatology, Technical University of Dresden, Germany.

12.

Galbraith, G.H. , Tao, Z. and McLean, R.C. (1993). Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 14 (3): 107–113.

13.

Kunzel, H.M. (1995). One and two dimensional heat and moisture transport in building components using simple parameters, IBP-Bericht FtB-39e/1995, Fraunhofer Instute for Building Physics, Germany.

14.

Galbraith, G.H. , Guo, J.S. , McLean, R.C. Lee, C.K. and Kelly, D.J. (1999). The temperature dependence of moisture permeability, CIBW40Conference, Prague, Czech Republic.

15.

Galbraith, G.H. , McLean, R.C. and Tao, Z. (1993). Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 2 (2): 67–70.

16.

McLean, R.C. , Galbraith, G.H. and Sanders, C.H. (1990) Building research and practice. The Journal of CIB, 2: 82–91.