Abstract
Background
In the treatment of partial thickness burns in pediatrics, silver sulfadiazine (SSD) has been widely used. Biobrane, a biosynthetic dressing, has gained popularity for treatment as well for its promotion of epithelial growth. Nonetheless, there is limited information on the comparison of SSD and Biobrane for the treatment of partial-thickness burns in children. This literature review aimed to provide objective data on increased epithelial growth and decreased infection risk of SSD and Biobrane.
Purpose
The aim of this study was to conduct a literature review to examine the use of Biobrane dressings in comparison with SSD for the treatment of partial-thickness burns in children to improve epithelial growth and decrease risk of infection as compared with SSD.
Results
Seven systemic reviews were included in the literature review. Evidence showed that there was limited high-quality evidence to confirm the effectiveness of Biobrane compared with SSD in the pediatric population with partial thickness burns in regard to fewer dressing changes, improved healing time, and reduced wound infections. Some evidence exists showing Biobrane's ease in use and improved healing time when compared with SSD.
Recommendations for Practice
Future research is necessary to investigate Biobrane and SSD within large pediatric burn populations to establish its effectiveness and provide high-quality evidence for the treatment of pediatric partial-thickness burns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.