Evaluating patients with potential metal hypersensitivity reactions is challenging. Clear evidence-based guidelines based on randomized studies are lacking. A pragmatic approach to evaluation of these patients is useful due to this lack of evidence. Patch testing remains the gold standard for evaluating type IV reactions on the skin and is also likely the best test for metal reactions to implanted devices until more hard data is available.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Basko-PlluskaJL, ThyssenJP, SchalockPC. Cutaneous and systemic hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants—an update. Dermatitis, 2011; 22: 65–79.
2.
HonariG, EllisSG, WilkoffBL, AronicaMA, et al.Hypersensitivity reactions associated with endovascular devices. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 59: 7–22.
ThyssenJP, MennéT, SchalockPC, et al.Pragmatic approach to the clinical work-up of patients with putative allergic disease to metallic orthopaedic implants before and after surgery. Br J Dermatol, 2011; 164: 473–478.
5.
SchalockPC, MennéT, JohansenJ, et al.Hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants—diagnostic algorithm and suggested patch test series for clinical use. Contact Dermatitis, 2012; 66: 4–19.
6.
ZugKA, WarshawEM, FowlerJFJr, et al.Patch-test results of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005–2006. Dermatitis, 2009; 20: 149–160.
