This clinical review article presents clinical and scientific data on cobalt sensitization and dermatitis. It is concluded that cobalt despite being a strong sensitizer and a prevalent contact allergen to come up on patch testing should be regarded as a very complex metal to test with. Exposure data together with clinical data from metal workers heavily exposed to cobalt suggest that patch-test reactions are sometimes false positive and that patch testers should carefully evaluate their clinical relevance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WahlbergJE, BomanA. Sensitization and testing of guinea pigs with cobalt chloride. Contact Dermatitis, 1978; 4 (3): 128-132.
2.
ScansettiG, BottaGC, SpinelliP, et al.Absorption and excretion of cobalt in the hard metal industry. Sci Total Environ, 1994; 150 (1-3): 141-144.
3.
LinnainmaaM, KiilunenM. Urinary cobalt as a measure of exposure in the wet sharpening of hard metal and stellite blades. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 1997; 69 (3): 193-200.
4.
LareseFF, MainaG, AdamiG, et al.In vitro percutaneous absorption of cobalt. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 2004; 77 (2): 85-89.
5.
ThyssenJP, LinnebergA, MenneT, et al.Contact allergy to allergens of the TRUE-test (panels 1 and 2) has decreased modestly in the general population. Br J Dermatol, 2009; 161 (5): 1124-1129.
6.
UterW, RamschC, AbererW, et al.The European baseline series in 10 European countries, 2005/2006—results of the European Surveillance System of Contact Allergies (ESSCA). Contact Dermatitis, 2009; 61: 31-38.
7.
ZugKA, WarshawEM, FowlerJFJr, et al.Patch-test results of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005-2006. Dermatitis, 2009; 20 (3): 149-160.
LidénC, BruzeM, ThyssenJP, et al.Metals. In: JohansenJD, LepoittevinJ-P, FroschPJ, eds. Contact Dermatitis. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer; 2011.
10.
FischerT, RystedtI. Cobalt allergy in hard metal workers. Contact Dermatitis, 1983; 9 (2): 115-121.
11.
PiriläV.Sensitization to cobalt in pottery workers. Acta Derm Venereol, 1953; 33: 193-198.
12.
FregertS, GruvbergerB. Blue and black pottery as a potential source of cobalt. Contact Dermatitis, 1984; 10 (1): 50.
13.
ChristensenJM, PoulsenOM. A 1982-1992 surveillance programme on Danish pottery painters. Biological levels and health effects following exposure to soluble or insoluble cobalt compounds in cobalt blue dyes. Sci Total Environ, 1994; 150 (1-3): 95-104.
14.
ThyssenJP, JohansenJD, JellesenMS, et al.Cobalt spot test used for diagnosis of occupationally-related exposure to cobalt-containing powder. Contact Dermatitis, 2012; 66 (4): 228-229.
FregertS, RorsmanH. Allergy to chromium, nickel and cobalt. Acta Derm Venereol, 1966; 46: 144-148.
17.
UterW, RuhlR, PfahlbergA, et al.Contact allergy in construction workers: results of a multifactorial analysis. Ann Occup Hyg, 2004; 48 (1): 21-27.
18.
WahlbergJE, LindstedtG, EinarssonO. Chromium, cobalt and nickel in Swedish cement, detergents, mould and cutting oils. Berufsdermatosen, 1977; 25 (6): 220-228.
19.
VilaplanaJ, GrimaltF, RomagueraC, et al.Cobalt content of household cleaning products. Contact Dermatitis, 1987; 16 (3): 139-141.
20.
BasketterDA, Briatico-VangosaG, KaestnerW, et al.Nickel, cobalt and chromium in consumer products: a role in allergic contact dermatitis?. Contact Dermatitis, 1993; 28 (1): 15-25.
21.
FischerT, BohlinS, EdlingC, et al.Skin disease and contact sensitivity in house painters using water-based paints, glues and putties. Contact Dermatitis, 1995; 32 (1): 39-45.
22.
AthavaleP, ShumKW, ChenY, et al.Occupational dermatitis related to chromium and cobalt: experience of dermatologists (EPIDERM) and occupational physicians (OPRA) in the U.K. over an 11-year period (1993-2004). Br J Dermatol, 2007; 157 (3): 518-522.
23.
KanervaL, JolankiR, EstlanderT, et al.Incidence rates of occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by metals. Am J Contact Dermat, 2000; 11 (3): 155-160.
24.
ThyssenJP, JohansenJD, MenneT, et al.A new spot test for detection of cobalt release—early experience and findings. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 63 (2): 63-69.
25.
ThyssenJP, SkareL, LundgrenL, et al.Sensitivity and specificity of the nickel spot (dimethylglyoxime) test. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 62 (5):\ 279-288.
26.
LidenC, SkareL, LindB, et al.Assessment of skin exposure to nickel, chromium and cobalt by acid wipe sampling and ICP-MS. Contact Dermatitis, 2006; 54 (5): 233-238.
27.
LidénC, SkareL, NiseG, et al.Deposition of nickel, chromium, and cobalt on the skin in some occupations—assessment by acid wipe sampling. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 58 (6): 347-354.
28.
JulanderA, SkareL, MulderM, et al.Skin deposition of nickel, cobalt, and chromium in production of gas turbines and space propulsion components. Ann Occup Hyg, 2010; 54 (3): 340-350.
29.
JulanderA, HindsenM, SkareL, et al.Cobalt-containing alloys and their ability to release cobalt and cause dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 2009; 60 (3): 165-170.
30.
ThyssenJP, JensenP, LidenC, et al.Assessment of nickel and cobalt release from 200 unused hand-held work tools for sale in Denmark—sources of occupational metal contact dermatitis?. Sci Total Environ, 2011; 409 (22): 4663-4666.
31.
DayGA, VirjiMA, StefaniakAB. Characterization of exposures among cemented tungsten carbide workers. Part II: assessment of surface contamination and skin exposures to cobalt, chromium and nickel. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 2009; 19 (4): 423-434.
HamannC, HamannD, HamannKK, et al.Cobalt release from inexpensive earrings from Thailand and China. Contact Dermatitis, 2011; 64 (4): 238-240.
34.
ThyssenJP, JellesenMS, MenneT, et al.Cobalt release from inexpensive jewellery: has the use of cobalt replaced nickel following regulatory intervention?. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 63 (2): 70-76.
35.
ThyssenJP, MenneT, LidenC, et al.Cobalt release from implants and consumer items and characteristics of cobalt sensitized patients with dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 2012; 66 (3): 113-122.
36.
HamannD, HamannC, LiL-F, et al.The Sino-American Belt Study: nickel and cobalt exposure, epidemiology and clinical considerations. Dermatitis, 2012; 23 (3): 117-123.
37.
PerrymanJH, FowlerJFJr. A patch test study to evaluate the allergenicity of a metallic jewelry alloy in patients allergic to cobalt. Cutis, 2006; 77 (2): 77-80.
38.
BoccaB, ForteG, SenofonteO, et al.A pilot study on the content and the release of Ni and other allergenic metals from cheap earrings available on the Italian market. Sci Total Environ, 2007; 388 (1-3): 24-34.
39.
HindsenM, PerssonL, GruvbergerB. Allergic contact dermatitis from cobalt in jewellery. Contact Dermatitis, 2005; 53 (6): 350-351.
40.
LidenC.Nickel in jewellery and associated products. Contact Dermatitis, 1992; 26 (2): 73-75.
41.
GoossensA, BedertR, ZimersonE. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by nickel and cobalt in green plastic shoes. Contact Dermatitis, 2001; 45 (3): 172.
SainioEL, JolankiR, HakalaE, et al.Metals and arsenic in eye shadows. Contact Dermatitis, 2000; 42 (1): 5-10.
44.
BasketterDA, AngeliniG, IngberA, et al.Nickel, chromium and cobalt in consumer products: revisiting safe levels in the new millennium. Contact Dermatitis, 2003; 49 (1): 1-7.
45.
CorazzaM, BaldoF, PagnoniA, et al.Measurement of nickel, cobalt and chromium in toy make-up by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Acta Dermatovenereol, 2009; 89 (2): 130-133.
46.
VeienNK, KaaberK. Nickel, cobalt and chromium sensitivity in patients with pompholyx (dyshidrotic eczema). Contact Dermatitis, 1979; 5 (6): 371-374.
47.
VeienNK, HattelT, JustesenO, et al.Oral challenge with metal salts. (II). Various types of eczema. Contact Dermatitis, 1983; 9 (5): 407-410.
48.
VeienNK, HattelT, JustesenO, et al.Oral challenge with nickel and cobalt in patients with positive patch tests to nickel and/or cobalt. Acta Derm Venereol, 1987; 67 (4): 321-325.
49.
VeienNK, HattelT, LaurbergG. Placebo-controlled oral challenge with cobalt in patients with positive patch tests to cobalt. Contact Dermatitis, 1995; 33 (1): 54-55.
Basko-PlluskaJL, ThyssenJP, SchalockPC. Cutaneous and systemic hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants. Dermatitis, 2011; 22 (2): 65-79.
52.
KimRH, DennisDA, CarothersJT. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2008; 23 (suppl 7): 44-46.
53.
HallabN, MerrittK, JacobsJJ. Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001; 83-A (3): 428-436.
54.
ThyssenJP, MenneT, SchalockPC, et al.Pragmatic approach to the clinical work-up of patients with putative allergic disease to metallic orthopaedic implants before and after surgery. Br J Dermatol, 2011; 164 (3): 473-478.
55.
ThyssenJP, MenneT, MollerP, et al.A cobalt spot test was useful in the diagnostic work-up of a cobalt allergic patient suffering from oral hypersensitivity to cobalt. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2011; 65 (3): 659-660.
56.
JensenP, ThyssenJP, RetpenJB, et al.Cobalt allergy and suspected aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vascular-associated lesion following total hip arthroplasty. Contact Dermatitis, 2009; 61 (4): 238-239.
57.
RystedtI.Evaluation and relevance of isolated test reactions to cobalt. Contact Dermatitis, 1979; 5 (4): 233-238.
58.
KhamaysiZ, WeltfriendS, KhamaysiK, et al.Contact hypersensitivity in patients with primary cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders. Int J Dermatol, 2011; 50 (4): 423-427.
59.
FischerT, RystedtI. False-positive, follicular and irritant patch test reactions to metal salts. Contact Dermatitis, 1985; 12 (2): 93-98.
60.
StorrsFJ, WhiteCR. False positive “poral” cobalt patch test reactions reside in the eccrine acrosyringium. Cutis, 2000; 65 (1): 49-53.
61.
VeienNK, SvejgaardE. Lymphocyte transformation in patients with cobalt dermatitis. Br J Dermatol, 1978; 99 (2): 191-196.
62.
KatsarouA, BaxevanisC, ArmenakaM, et al.Study of persistence and loss of patch test reactions to dichromate and cobalt. Contact Dermatitis, 1997; 36 (2): 87-90.
63.
de FineOF, MenneT. Skin reactivity to metallic cobalt in patients with a positive patch test to cobalt chloride. Contact Dermatitis, 1992; 27 (4): 241-243.
ThyssenJP, JohansenJD, CarlsenBC, et al.Prevalence of nickel and cobalt allergy among female patients with dermatitis before and after Danish government regulation: a 23-year retrospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2009; 61 (5): 799-805.
66.
PiriläV, FörstromL. Pseudo cross-sensitivity between cobalt and nickel. Acta Derm Venereol, 1966; 46: 40-45.
67.
EpsteinE, ReesWJ, MaibachHI. Recent experience with routine patch test screening. Arch Dermatol, 1968; 98 (1): 18-22.
68.
EedyDJ, BurrowsD, McmasterD. The nickel content of certain commercially available metallic patch test materials and its relevance in nickel-sensitive subjects. Contact Dermatitis, 1991; 24 (1): 11-15.
HindsénM, SpirenA, BruzeM. Cross-reactivity between nickel and palladium demonstrated by systemic administration of nickel. Contact Dermatitis, 2005; 53 (1): 2-8.
71.
BraschJ, GeierJ. Patch test results in schoolchildren—results from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) and the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG). Contact Dermatitis, 1997; 37 (6): 286-293.
72.
UterW, FuchsT, HausserM, et al.Patch test results with serial dilutions of nickel sulfate (with and without detergent), palladium chloride, and nickel and palladium metal plates. Contact Dermatitis, 1995; 32 (3): 135-142.
73.
MenneT.Relationship between cobalt and nickel sensitization in females. Contact Dermatitis, 1980; 6 (5): 337-340.
74.
RystedtI, FischerT. Relationship between nickel and cobalt sensitization in hard metal workers. Contact Dermatitis, 1983; 9 (3): 195-200.
75.
ChristensenOB.Prognosis in nickel allergy and hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis, 1982; 8 (1): 7-15.
76.
LammintaustaK, PitkanenOP, KalimoK, et al.Interrelationship of nickel and cobalt contact sensitization. Contact Dermatitis, 1985; 13 (3): 148-152.
