Contact dermatitis is a common disease that is associated with impaired quality of life.
Objective
We examined the effect of travel distance and other socioeconomic factors on duration of dermatitis before presentation at the Duke Contact Dermatitis and Patch Testing Center.
Methods
This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent patch testing from March 1, 2012, to August 1, 2018. Associations between duration of dermatitis, distance to clinic, and socioeconomic factors (age, race, payor group, county poverty rate, rural-urban status) were examined.
Results
The median duration of dermatitis was 14 months (Q1 = 7 months; Q3 = 36 months), and the median distance to clinic was 18 miles (Q1 = 7 miles; Q3 = 45.9 miles). For a 50-mile increase in the distance from the patient's zip code to the clinic, the median duration of dermatitis increased by 17.9% (P < 0.001). For every 5% increase in the county poverty rate, the median duration of dermatitis increased by 16.3% (n = 29; P = 0.032). Trends were noted for a longer duration of dermatitis based on insurance payor, rural-urban status, and race.
Conclusions
Distance to patch test provider and county poverty status are important measures of access for patients with dermatitis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LimHW, CollinsSAB, ResneckJSJr, et al.The burden of skin disease in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2017; 76(5):958–972.e952.
2.
AyalaF, NinoM, FabbrociniG, et al.Quality of life and contact dermatitis: a disease-specific questionnaire. Dermatitis, 2010; 21(2):84–90.
3.
WooPN, HayIC, OrmerodAD. An audit of the value of patch testing and its effect on quality of life. Contact Dermatitis, 2003; 48(5):244–247.
4.
HeisterbergMV, MennéT, JohansenJD. Fragrance allergy and quality of life - development and validation of a disease-specific quality of life instrument. Contact Dermatitis, 2014; 70(2):69–80.
5.
KadykDL, McCarterK, AchenF, et al.Quality of life in patients with allergic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2003; 49(6):1037–1048.
6.
KalboussiH, KacemI, ArouiH, et al.Impact of allergic contact dermatitis on the quality of life and work productivity. Dermatol Res Pract, 2019; 1–8.
7.
KadykDL, HallS, BelsitoDV. Quality of life of patients with allergic contact dermatitis: an exploratory analysis by gender, ethnicity, age, and occupation. Dermatitis, 2004; 15(3):117–124.
8.
StitzenbergKB, ThomasNE, DaltonK, et al.Distance to diagnosing provider as a measure of access for patients with melanoma. Arch Dermatol, 2007; 143(8):991–998.
9.
CashmanMW, ReutemannPA, EhrlichA. Contact dermatitis in the United States: epidemiology, economic impact, and workplace prevention. Dermatol Clin, 2012; 30(1):87–98.
10.
KeegelT, MoyleM, DharmageS, et al.The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis (1990–2007): a systematic review. Int J Dermatol, 2009; 48(6):571–578.
11.
MorroneA, BordignonV, BarnabasGA, et al.Clinical-epidemiological features of contact dermatitis in rural and urban communities in northern Ethiopia: correlation with environmental or occupational exposure. Int J Dermatol, 2014; 53(8):975–980.
12.
ThyssenJP, LinnebergA, MenneT, et al.The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population—prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis, 2007; 57(5):287–299.
13.
DeLeoVA, AlexisA, WarshawEM, et al.The association of race/ethnicity and patch test results: North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998–2006. Dermatitis, 2016; 27(5):288–292.
SnyderBM, MounessaJS, FazzariM, et al.Greater distance to an academic medical center is associated with poorer melanoma prognostic factors: the University of Colorado experience. Dermatol Online J, 2017; 23(11):1–6.
16.
WengQY, BuzneyE, JoyceC, et al.Distance of travel to phototherapy is associated with early nonadherence: a retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2016; 74(6):1256–1259.
17.
JainR, MenzinJ, LachanceK, et al.Travel burden associated with rare cancers: the example of merkel cell carcinoma. Cancer Med, 2019; 8(5):2580–2586.
18.
MulcahyA, MehrotraA, EdisonK, et al.Variation in dermatologist visits by sociodemographic characteristics. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2017; 76(5):918–924.
19.
AdamsonAS, ZhouL, BaggettCD, et al.Association of delays in surgery for melanoma with insurance type. JAMA Dermatol, 2017; 153(11):1106–1113.
20.
HorvathMM, WinfieldS, EvansS, et al.The DEDUCE guided query tool: providing simplified access to clinical data for research and quality improvement. J Biomed Inform, 2011; 44(2):266–276.
VetterleinMW, LöppenbergB, KarabonP, et al.Impact of travel distance to the treatment facility on overall mortality in US patients with prostate cancer. Cancer, 2017; 123(17):3241–3252.
24.
WillsMJ, WhitmanMV, EnglishTM. Travel distance to cancer treatment facilities in the deep south. J Healthc Manag, 2017; 62(1):30–43.
25.
RingstromMJ, ChristianJ, BushML, et al.Travel distance: impact on stage of presentation and treatment choices in head and neck cancer. Am J Otolaryngol, 2018; 39(5):575–581.
26.
CasaleJC, WolfF, PeiY, et al.Socioeconomic and ethnic disparities in the use of biventricular pacemakers in heart failure patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Ethn Dis, 2013; 23(3):275–280.
27.
DelgadoDJ, LinWY, CoffeyM. The role of Hispanic race/ethnicity and poverty in breast cancer survival. P R Health Sci J, 1995; 14(2):103–116.
28.
RenZ, HsuDY, BrievaJ, et al.Hospitalization, inpatient burden and comorbidities associated with bullous pemphigoid in the U.S.A.Br J Dermatol, 2016; 176(1):87–99.
29.
GoldenbergA, MousdicasN, SilverbergN, et al.Pediatric contact dermatitis registry inaugural case data. Dermatitis, 2016; 27(5):293–302.
30.
Black demographics: the African American population. 2017. Available at: https://blackdemographics.com/. Accessed May23, 2019.
KooistraL, ChiangK, DawesS, et al.Racial disparities and insurance status: an epidemiological analysis of Ohio melanoma patients. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2018; 78(5):998–1000.
34.
UhlenhakeE, BrodellR, MostowE. The dermatology work force: a focus on urban versus rural wait times. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2009; 61(1):17–22.
