In 2017, the Food and Drug Administration banned the marketing of triclosan and triclocarban in antibacterial soaps, citing inefficacy and concerns of systemic absorption and antibacterial resistance. As a result, there is an anticipated decrease in the number of triclosan-containing products on the market with an associated increase in antibacterial alternatives (eg, benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, chloroxylenol, chlorhexidine) and cases of allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
Objectives
The aims of the study were to determine the extent that triclosan and triclocarban are being used in the consumer and medical industries after the Food and Drug Administration marketing ban and to appraise the risk of allergic contact dermatitis to triclosan alternatives.
Methods
The National Drug Code Directory (NDCD), Google, Amazon, Target, Walgreens, Walmart, CVS, and Colorado hospitals were surveyed for antibacterial soap use. Antibiotics surveyed include triclosan, triclocarban, benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, chloroxylenol, and chlorhexidine.
Results
The most common antibiotics reported by the NDCD, consumer sites, and Colorado hospitals were benzalkonium chloride, chloroxylenol, and triclosan, respectively. Triclosan accounted for the second most prevalent antibacterial in the NDCD- and consumer site–surveyed products.
Conclusions
The triclosan marketing ban may instigate increased exposure to triclosan alternatives. The addition of antibacterial products to hand soaps does not improve soap effectiveness and may cause harm by contributing to antibiotic resistance and the development of allergic conditions. Additional studies are needed to elucidate the benefits and harms of antibacterial soaps.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ClaytonEM, ToddM, DowdJB, et al. The impact of bisphenol A and triclosan on immune parameters in the U.S. population, NHANES 2003–2006. Environ Health Perspect, 2011; 119(3):390–396.
2.
RundleCW, BergmanD, GoldenbergA, et al.Contact dermatitis considerations in atopic dermatitis. Clin Dermatol, 2017; 35(4):367–374.
3.
KimSA, RheeMS. Microbicidal effects of plain soap vs triclocarban-based antibacterial soap. J Hosp Infect, 2016; 94(3):276–280.
CareyDE, McNamaraPJ. The impact of triclosan on the spread of antibiotic resistance in the environment. Front Microbiol, 2015; 5:780.
6.
SreevidyaVS, LenzKA, SvobodaKR, et al.Benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, and chloroxylenol—three replacement antimicrobials are more toxic than triclosan and triclocarban in two model organisms. Environ Pollut Barking Essex 1987, 2018; 235:814–824.
7.
World Health Organization. Skin reactions related to hand hygiene. In: WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care: First Global Patient Safety Challenge Cleaner Care Is Safer Care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009:14.
8.
Economics Staff, Office of the Commissioner, Office of Planning, Office of Policy, Planning, Legislation, and Analysis. Safety and effectiveness of consumer antiseptics; topical antimicrobial drug products for over-the-counter human use. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/aboutfda/reportsmanualsforms/reports/economicanalyses/ucm519798.pdf. Accessed August21, 2018.
9.
DaoHJ, FrickerC, NedorostST. Sensitization prevalence for benzalkonium chloride and benzethonium chloride. Dermat Contact Atopic Occup Drug, 2012; 23(4):162–166.
HaldenRU, LindemanAE, AielloAE, et al.The Florence statement on triclosan and triclocarban. Environ Health Perspect, 2017; 125(6):064501.
12.
WongCS, BeckMH. Allergic contact dermatitis from triclosan in antibacterial handwashes. Contact Dermatitis, 2001; 45(5):307.
13.
SadakaneK, IchinoseT. Effect of the hand antiseptic agents benzalkonium chloride, povidone-iodine, ethanol, and chlorhexidine gluconate on atopic dermatitis in NC/Nga mice. Int J Med Sci, 2015; 12(2):116–125.
14.
OisoN, FukaiK, IshiiM. Irritant contact dermatitis from benzalkonium chloride in shampoo. Contact Dermatitis, 2005; 52(1):54.
15.
UterW, LessmannH, GeierJ, et al.Is the irritant benzalkonium chloride a contact allergen? A contribution to the ongoing debate from a clinical perspective. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 58(6):359–363.
16.
HannS, HughesTM, StoneNM. Flexural allergic contact dermatitis to benzalkonium chloride in antiseptic bath oil. Br J Dermatol, 2007; 157(4):795–798.
17.
WongDA, WatsonAB. Allergic contact dermatitis due to benzalkonium chloride in plaster of Paris. Australas J Dermatol, 2001; 42(1):33–35.
18.
CusanoF, LucianoS. Contact allergy to benzalkonium chloride and glutaraldehyde in a dental nurse. Contact Dermatitis, 1993; 28(2):127.
19.
SunejaT, BelsitoDV. Occupational dermatoses in health care workers evaluated for suspected allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 58(5):285–290.
20.
FisherAA.Allergic contact dermatitis and conjunctivitis from benzalkonium chloride. Cutis, 1987; 39(5):381–383.
21.
WentworthAB, YianniasJA, DavisMD, et al.Benzalkonium chloride: a known irritant and novel allergen. Dermatitis, 2016; 27(1):14–20.
BrittonJER, WilkinsonSM, EnglishJSC, et al.The British standard series of contact dermatitis allergens: validation in clinical practice and value for clinical governance. Br J Dermatol, 2003; 148(2):259–264.
26.
WarshawEM, SchramSE, MaibachHI, et al.Occupation-related contact dermatitis in North American health care workers referred for patch testing: cross-sectional data, 1998 to 2004. Dermatitis, 2008; 19(5):261–274.
27.
YamanoT, ShimizuM, NodaT. Allergenicity evaluation of p-chloro-m-cresol and p-chloro-m-xylenol by non-radioactive murine local lymph-node assay and multiple-dose guinea pig maximization test. Toxicology, 2003; 190(3):259–266.
GoonATJ, WhiteIR, RycroftRJG, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis from chlorhexidine. Dermatitis, 2004; 15(1):45–47.
30.
WattsTJ, LiPH, UeKL, et al.Chronic allergic contact dermatitis due to chlorhexidine. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2018; 6(1):254–255.
31.
LiippoJ, KousaP, LammintaustaK. The relevance of chlorhexidine contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis, 2011; 64(4):229–234.
32.
OpstrupMS, JohansenJD, ZachariaeC, et al.Contact allergy to chlorhexidine in a tertiary dermatology clinic in Denmark. Contact Dermatitis, 2016; 74(1):29–36.
33.
EkorM.The growing use of herbal medicines: issues relating to adverse reactions and challenges in monitoring safety. Front Pharmacol, 2014; 4:177.
34.
ChandraH, BishnoiP, YadavA, et al.Antimicrobial resistance and the alternative resources with special emphasis on plant-based antimicrobials—a review. Plants (Basel), 2017; 6(2):16.
35.
FerreiraM, TeixeiraM, SilvaE, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis to Aloe vera. Contact Dermatitis, 2007; 57(4):278–279.
36.
SchalockPC, DunnickCA, NedorostS, et al.American Contact Dermatitis Society Core Allergen Series: 2017 update. Dermatitis, 2017; 28(2):141–143.
37.
AthibanPP, BorthakurBJ, GanesanS, et al.Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of Aloe vera and its effectiveness in decontaminating gutta percha cones. J Conserv Dent JCD, 2012; 15(3):246–248.
38.
HeggersJP, CottinghamJ, GusmanJ, et al.The effectiveness of processed grapefruit-seed extract as an antibacterial agent: II. Mechanism of action and in vitro toxicity. J Altern Complement Med N Y N, 2002; 8(3):333–340.
MulyaningsihS, SporerF, ReichlingJ, et al.Antibacterial activity of essential oils from Eucalyptus and of selected components against multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens. Pharm Biol, 2011; 49(9):893–899.
41.
BleaselN, TateB, RademakerM. Allergic contact dermatitis following exposure to essential oils. Australas J Dermatol, 2002; 43(3):211–213.
42.
NaikMI, FomdaBA, JaykumarE, et al.Antibacterial activity of lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) oil against some selected pathogenic bacterias. Asian Pac J Trop Med, 2010; 3(7):535–538.
43.
CardulloAC, RuszkowskiAM, DeLeoVA. Allergic contact dermatitis resulting from sensitivity to citrus peel, geraniol, and citral. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1989; 21(2 Pt 2):395–397.
44.
AibinuI, AdenipekunT, AdelowotanT, et al.Evaluation of the antimicrobial properties of different parts of Citrus aurantifolia (lime fruit) as used locally. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med AJTCAM, 2006; 4(2):185–190.
45.
LiuY, McKeeverLC, MalikNSA. Assessment of the Antimicrobial Activity of Olive Leaf Extract Against Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens. Front Microbiol, 2017; 8:113.
46.
IsakssonM, BruzeM. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from olive oil in a masseur. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1999; 41(2 Pt 2):312–315.
47.
SaeedS, TariqP.Antibacterial activity of oregano (Origanum vulgare Linn.) against gram positive bacteria. Pak J Pharm Sci, 2009; 22(4):421–424.
48.
ThosarN, BasakS, BahadureRN, et al.Antimicrobial efficacy of five essential oils against oral pathogens: An in vitro study. Eur J Dent, 2013; 7(Suppl 1):S71–S77.
49.
SinghR, ShushniMAM, BelkheirA. Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of Mentha piperita L. Arab J Chem, 2015; 8(3):322–328.
50.
Martínez-GonzálezMC, Goday BujánJJ, Martínez GómezW, et al.Concomitant allergic contact dermatitis due to Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary) and Thymus vulgaris (thyme). Contact Dermatitis, 2007; 56(1):49–50.
51.
NietoG, RosG, CastilloJ. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis, L.): A Review. Med Basel Switz, 2018; 5(3):98.
52.
BonamonteD, MundoL, DaddabboM, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis from Mentha spicata (spearmint). Contact Dermatitis, 2001; 45(5):298.
53.
de GrootAC, SchmidtE. Essential Oils, Part IV: Contact Allergy. Dermat Contact Atopic Occup Drug, 2016; 27(4):170–175.
54.
CarsonCF, HammerKA, RileyTV. Melaleuca alternifolia (Tea Tree) oil: a review of antimicrobial and other medicinal properties. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2006; 19(1):50–62.
55.
FaniM, KohantebJ. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Thymus vulgaris Essential Oil Against Major Oral Pathogens. J Evid-Based Complement Altern Med, 2017; 22(4):660–666.
56.
SiegelJ, MounessaJS, DellavalleRP, et al.Comparison of contact allergens in bar soaps and liquid body washes. Dermatitis, 2018; 2(1):51–53.
