In 2009, President Barack Obama signed into law the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, which aims for the universal adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) in primary care settings and “meaningful use” of this technology. The objectives of “meaningful use” are well defined and executed in stages; one of the objectives of stage 2, beginning in 2014, was implementation of a secure messaging system between patients and providers. Secure messaging has been shown to positively affect patients who struggle with managing chronic diseases on a day to day basis. This review aims to assess the clinical evidence supporting the use of secure messaging in EHRs in self-management of diabetes.Methods:A systematic search of PubMed was conducted, and 320 results were returned. Of these, 11 were selected based on outlined criteria.Conclusions:Evidence from 7 of the 11 included studies suggests significant improvement in patients' hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) with the use of secure messaging. However, improvements in patients' secondary outcomes, such as blood pressure and cholesterol, were inconsistent. Further work must be done to determine how to best maximize the potential of available tools such as secure messaging and EHRs to improve patient outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HITECH Answers. CMS EHR Incentive Program for Eligible Professionals, Eligible Hospitals and CAHs. Available at www.hitechanswers.net/ehr-incentive-program/ (last accessed August9, 2015).
2.
HealthIT. What is an electronic health record (EHR)? Available at www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/faqs/what-electronic-health-record-ehr (last accessed August10, 2015).
3.
HealthIT. Meaningful use definition & objectives. Available at www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/meaningful-use-definition-objectives (last accessed August10, 2015).
4.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.. Stage 2 overview tipsheet. August. 2012. Available at www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/Stage2Overview_Tipsheet.pdf (last accessed August9, 2015).
5.
Department of Health and Human Services and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program—Stage 2. Final rule. Fed Regist, 2012; 77:53967–54162.
6.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.. Stage 2 eligible professional meaningful use core measures, measure 17 of 17. October. 2012. Available at www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/downloads/Stage2_EPCore_17_UseSecureElectronicMessaging.pdf (last accessed August10, 2015).
7.
NeunerJ, et al.Meaningful use and the patient portal: Patient enrollment, use, and satisfaction with patient portals at a later-adopting center. Am J Med Qual, 2015; 30:105–113.
8.
LamR, et al.Older adult consumers' attitudes and preferences on electronic patient-physician messaging. Am J Manag Care, 2013; 19:eSP7–eSP11.
9.
RiippaI, LinnaM, RonkkoI. The effect of a patient portal with electronic messaging on patient activation among chronically ill patients: Controlled before-and-after study. J Med Internet Res, 2014; 16:e257.
10.
MakaiP, et al.Evaluation of an eHealth intervention in chronic care for frail older people: Why adherence is the first target. J Med Internet Res, 2014; 16:e156.
11.
TenfordeM, JainA, HicknerJ. The value of personal health records for chronic disease management: What do we know?. Fam Med, 2011; 43:351–354.
12.
American Diabetes Association.. Statistics about diabetes. June 10, 2014. Available at www.diabetes.org/diabetes-basics/statistics/ (last accessed August9, 2015).
13.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.. Number (in millions) of civilian, noninstitutionalized persons with diagnosed diabetes, United States, 1980–2011. March 28, 2013. Available at www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/prev/national/figpersons.htm (last accessed August9, 2015).
14.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.. National Diabetes Statistics Report. 2014. Available at www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/statsreport14/national-diabetes-report-web.pdf (last accessed August9, 2015).
15.
DorrD, et al.Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: A literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2007; 14:156–163.
16.
BondGE, et al.The effects of a web-based intervention on the physical outcomes associated with diabetes among adults age 60 and older: A randomized trial. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2007; 9:52–59.
17.
SmithKE, et al.Impact of MyCareTeam for poorly controlled diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2004; 6:828–835.
18.
McMahonGT, et al.Web-based care management in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2005; 28:1624–1629.
19.
FondaSJ, et al.Changes in diabetes distress related to participation in an internet-based diabetes care management program and glycemic control. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2009; 3:117–124.
KlonoffDC. Twelve modern digital technologies that are transforming decision making for diabetes and all areas of health care. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2013; 7:291–295.
22.
CorserW, et al.A shared decision-making primary care intervention for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ, 2007; 33:700–708.
23.
BrandaME, et al.Shared decision making for patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial in primary care. BMC Health Serv Res, 2013; 13:301.
24.
JovellAJ. Navarro-RubioMD. [Evaluation of scientific evidence]. Med Clin (Barc), 1995; 105:740–743.
25.
HaileyD, RoineR, OhinmaaA. Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare, 2002; 8(Suppl 1):1–30.
26.
TangPC, et al.Online disease management of diabetes: Engaging and motivating patients online with enhanced resources-diabetes (EMPOWER-D), a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2013; 20:526–534.
27.
RalstonJD, et al.Web-based collaborative care for type 2 diabetes: A pilot randomized trial. Diabetes Care, 2009; 32:234–239.
28.
GreenwoodDA, et al.A comparison of in-person, telephone, and secure messaging for type 2 diabetes self-management support. Diabetes Educ, 2014; 40:516–525.
29.
LauM, et al.Impact of patient use of an online patient portal on diabetes outcomes. Can J Diabetes, 2014; 38:17–21.
30.
TenfordeM, et al.The association between personal health record use and diabetes quality measures. J Gen Intern Med, 2012; 27:420–424.
31.
Wade-VuturoAE, MayberryLS, OsbornCY. Secure messaging and diabetes management: Experiences and perspectives of patient portal users. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2013; 20:519–525.
32.
ChenL, et al.Evaluating self-management behaviors of diabetic patients in a telehealthcare program: Longitudinal study over 18 months. J Med Internet Res, 2013; 15:e266.
33.
ShawRJ, FerrantiJ. Patient-provider internet portals—patient outcomes and use. Comput Inform Nurs, 2011; 29:714–718; quiz 719–720.
34.
OsbornCY, et al.Understanding patient portal use: Implications for medication management. J Med Internet Res, 2013; 15:e133.
35.
HarrisLT, et al.Glycemic control associated with secure patient-provider messaging within a shared electronic medical record: A longitudinal analysis. Diabetes Care, 2013; 36:2726–2733.
36.
HarrisLT, et al.Diabetes quality of care and outpatient utilization associated with electronic patient-provider messaging: A cross-sectional analysis. Diabetes Care, 2009; 32:1182–1187.
37.
ZhaiYK, et al.Clinical- and cost-effectiveness of telemedicine in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 2014; 93:e312.
38.
GreenwoodDA, YoungHM, QuinnCC. Telehealth remote monitoring systematic review: Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose and impact on A1C. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2014; 8:378–389.
39.
ArnholdM, QuadeM, KirchW. Mobile applications for diabetics: A systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older. J Med Internet Res, 2014; 16:e104.
40.
AmanteDJ, et al.A systematic review of electronic portal usage among patients with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2014; 16:784–793.
41.
DangS, et al.Differential resource utilization benefits with Internet-based care coordination in elderly veterans with chronic diseases associated with high resource utilization. Telemed J E Health, 2006; 12:14–23.
42.
McMahonGT, et al.A randomized comparison of online- and telephone-based care management with internet training alone in adult patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2012; 14:1060–1067.
43.
LiedermanEM, et al.The impact of patient-physician Web messaging on provider productivity. J Healthc Inf Manag, 2005; 19:81–86.
44.
DangS, et al.Integration MyHealtheVet into the management of heart failure patients in the Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACTs). J Am Ger Soc, 2015; 63:S1–S65. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13439.
45.
HaunJN, et al.Evaluating user experiences of the secure messaging tool on the Veterans Affairs' patient portal system. J Med Internet Res, 2014; 16:e75.
46.
LylesCR, et al.Patient-provider communication and trust in relation to use of an online patient portal among diabetes patients: The Diabetes and Aging Study. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2013; 20:1128–1131.
47.
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation. General diabetes facts. Available at http://jdrf.org/about-jdrf/fact-sheets/general-diabetes-facts/ (last accessed August9, 2015).
