CrossSS, DennisT, StartRD. Telepathology: Current status and future prospects in diagnostic histopathology. Histopathology, 2002; 41:91–109.
9.
WeinsteinRS, GrahamAR, RichterLC, BarkerGP, KrupinskiEA, LopezAM, ErpsKA, BhattacharyyaAK, YagiY, GilbertsonJR. Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: Prospects for the future. Hum Pathol, 2009; 40:1057–1069.
10.
EvansAJ, KiehlTR, CroulS. Frequently asked questions concerning the use of whole-slide imaging telepathology for neuropathology frozen sections. Semin Diagn Pathol, 2010; 27:160–166.
11.
WilliamsS, HenricksWH, BecichMJ, ToscanoM, CarterAB. Telepathology for patient care: What am I getting myself into?. Adv Anat Pathol, 2010; 17:130–149.
12.
Della MeaV. 25 years of telepathology research: A bibliometric analysis. Diagn Pathol, 2011; 6(Suppl 1):S26.
13.
PantanowitzL, WileyCA, DemetrisA, LesniakA, AhmedI, CableW, ContisL, ParwaniAV. Experience with multimodality telepathology at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. J Pathol Inform, 2012; 3:45.
14.
WeinsteinRS, GrahamAR, LianF, BraunhutBL, BarkerGR, KrupinskiEA, BhattacharyyaAK. Reconciliation of diverse telepathology system designs. Historic issues and implications for emerging markets and new applications. APMIS, 2012; 120:256–275.
15.
WinokurTS, McClellanS, SiegalGP, ReddyV, ListinskyCM, ConnerD, GoldmanJ, GrimesG, VaughnG, McDonaldJM. An initial trial of a prototype telepathology system featuring static imaging with discrete control of the remote microscope. Am J Clin Pathol, 1998; 110:43–49.
FisherSI, NandedkarMA, WilliamsBH, AbbondanzoSL. Telehematopathology in a clinical consultative practice. Hum Pathol, 2001; 32:1327–1333.
18.
EvansAJ, ChettyR, ClarkeBA, CroulS, GhazarianDM, KiehlTR, Perez OrdonezB, IlaalaganS, AsaSL. Primary frozen section diagnosis by robotic microscopy and virtual slide telepathology: The University Health Network experience. Hum Pathol, 2009; 40:1070–1081.
19.
WilburDC, MadiK, ColvinRB, DuncanLM, FaquinWC, FerryJA, FroschMP, HouserSL, KradinRL, LauwersGY, LouisDN, MarkEJ, Mino-KenudsonM, MisdrajiJ, NielsenGP, PitmanMB, RosenbergAE, SmithRN, SohaniAR, StoneJR, TambouretRH, WuCL, YoungRH, ZembowiczA, KlietmannW. Whole-slide imaging digital pathology as a platform for teleconsultation: A pilot study using paired subspecialist correlations. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2009; 133:1949–1953.
20.
ThrallM, PantanowitzL, KhalbussWE. Telecytology: Clinical applications, current challenges and future benefits. J Pathol Inform, 2011; 2:51.
21.
NakayamaI, MatsumuraT, KamatakiA, UzukiM, SaitoK, HobbsJ, AkasakaT, SawaiT. Development of a teledermatopathology consultation system using virtual slides. Diagn Pathol, 2012; 7:177.
22.
GouldPV, SaikaliS. A comparison of digitized frozen section and smear preparations for intraoperative neurotelepathology. Anal Cell Pathol, 2012; 35:85–91.
23.
KhuranaKK. Telecytology and its evolving role in cytopathology. Diagn Cytopathol, 2012; 40:498–502.
24.
CollinsBT. Telepathology in cytopathology: Challenges and opportunities. Acta Cytol, 2013; 57:221–232.
25.
HedvatCV. Digital microscopy: Past, present, and future. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2010; 134:1666–1670.
26.
WeinsteinRS. Static image telepathology in perspective. Hum Pathol, 1996; 27:99–101.
27.
DunnBE, ChoiH, ReclaDL, KerrSE, WagenmanBL. Robotic surgical telepathology between the Iron Mountain and Milwaukee Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers: A 12-year experience. Hum Pathol, 2009; 40:1092–1099.
28.
KaplanKJ, BurgessJR, SandbergGD, MyersCP, BigottTR, GreenspanRB. Use of robotic telepathology for frozen-section diagnosis: A retrospective trial of a telepathology system for intraoperative consultation. Mod Pathol, 2002; 15:1197–1204.
29.
BaakJP, van DiestPJ, MeijerGA. Experience with a dynamic inexpensive video-conferencing system for frozen section telepathology. Anal Cell Pathol, 2000; 21:169–175.
30.
SinardJH. Practical pathology informatics. New York: Springer, 2006:265–286.
31.
BuxbaumJL, EloubeidiMA, LaneCJ, VaradarajuluS, LinderA, CroweAE, JhalaD, JhalaNC, CroweDR, EltoumIA. Dynamic telecytology compares favorably to rapid onsite evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspirates. Dig Dis Sci, 2012; 57:3092–3097.
32.
PantanowitzL, ValensteinPN, EvansAJ, KaplanKJ, PfeiferJD, WilburDC, CollinsLC, ColganTJ. Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology. J Pathol Inform, 2011; 2:36.
GhaznaviF, EvansA, MadabhushiA, FeldmanM. Digital imaging in pathology: Whole-slide imaging and beyond. Annu Rev Pathol, 2013; 8:331–359.
35.
Della MeaV, CataldiP, PertoldiB, et al.Combining dynamic- and static-robotic techniques for real-time telepathology. In: KumarS, DunnBE, eds. Telepathology. Berlin: Springer, 2009:79–89.
36.
YagiY, WeinsteinR, GilbertsonJ; ATA's Telepathology Special Interest Group. Clinical guidelines for telepathology. American Telemedicine Association. 1999. Available at www.americantelemed.org/docs/default-source/standards/clinical-guidelines-for-telepathology.pdf?sfvrsn=4 (last accessed September12, 2014).
37.
BernardC, ChandrakanthSA, CornellIS, DaltonJ, EvansA, GarciaBM, et al.Guidelines from the Canadian Association of Pathologists for establishing a telepathology service for anatomic pathology using whole-slide imaging. J Pathol Inform, 2014; 5:15.
38.
LoweJ. Telepathology: Guideline from the Royal College of Pathologists. 2013. Available at www.rcpath.org/Resources/RCPath/Migrated%20Resources/Documents/G/G026_Telepathology_Oct13.pdf (last accessed September12, 2014).
39.
DoolittleMH, DoolittleKW, WinkelmanZ, WeinbergDS. Color images in telepathology: How many colors do we need?. Hum Pathol, 1997; 28:36–41.
40.
KrupinskiEA. Optimizing the pathology workstation “cockpit”: Challenges and solutions. J Pathol Inform, 2010; 1:19.
41.
YagiY. Color standardization and optimization in whole slide imaging. Diagn Pathol, 2011; 6(Suppl 1):S15.
42.
BautistaPA, HashimotoN, YagiY. Color standardization in whole slide imaging using a color calibration slide. J Pathol Inform, 2014; 5:4.
SpeiserJJ, HughesI, MehtaV, WojcikEM, HutchensKA. Mobile teledermatopathology: Using a tablet PC as a novel and cost-efficient method to remotely diagnose dermatopathology cases. Am J Dermatopathol, 2014; 36:54–57.
45.
Romero LauroG, CableW, LesniakA, TseytlinE, McHughJ, ParwaniA, PantanowitzL. Digital pathology consultations—A new era in digital imaging, challenges and practical applications. J Dig Imag, 2013; 26:668–677.
46.
MarceloA, FonteloP, FarolanM, CualingH. Effect of image compression on telepathology. A randomized clinical trial. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2000; 124:1653–165.
47.
KrupinskiEA, JohnsonJP, JawS, GrahamAR, WeinsteinRS. Compressing pathology whole-slide images using a human and model observer evaluation. J Pathol Inform, 2012; 3:17.
48.
PantanowitzL, SinardJH, HenricksWH, FathereeLA, CarterAB, ContisL, BeckwithBA, EvansAJ, LalA, ParwaniAV; College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: Guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2013; 137:1710–1722.
49.
BauerTW, SchoenfieldL, SlawRJ, YerianL, SunZ, HenricksWH. Validation of whole slide imaging for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2013; 137:518–524.
50.
JenKY, OlsonJL, BrodskyS, ZhouXJ, NadasdyT, LaszikZG. Reliability of whole slide images as a diagnostic modality for renal allograft biopsies. Hum Pathol, 2013; 44:888–894.
51.
EvansAJ, Perez-OrdonezB, AsaSL. Primary diagnosis by whole slide imaging (WSI) telepathology: University Health Network (UHN) goes live [abstract]. Mod Pathol, 2014; 27(Suppl 2):399A.
52.
ReyesC, IkpattOF, NadjiM, CoteRJ. Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies. J Pathol Inform, 2014; 5:5.
53.
DangottB, ParwaniA. Whole slide imaging for teleconsultation and clinical use. J Pathol Inform, 2010; 1:7.
54.
CampbellWS, LeleSM, WestWW, LazenbyAJ, SmithLM, HinrichsSH. Concordance between whole-slide imaging and light microscopy for routine surgical pathology. Hum Pathol, 2012; 43:1739–1744.
55.
StathonikosN, VetaM, HuismanA, van DiestPJ. Going fully digital: Perspective of a Dutch academic pathology lab. J Pathol Inform, 2013; 4:15.
56.
PantanowitzL, ParwaniAV, KhalbussWE. Digital imaging for cytopathology: Are we there yet?. Cytopathology, 2011; 22:73–74.
57.
WilburDC. Digital cytology: Current state of the art and prospects for the future. Acta Cytol, 2011; 55:227–238.
58.
AlmagroUA, DunnBE, ChoiH, ReclaDL, WeinsteinRS. The gross pathology workstation: An essential component of a dynamic-robotic telepathology system. Cell Vision, 1996; 3:470–473.
GiansantiD, CastrichellaL, GiovagnoliMR. Telepathology requires specific training for the technician in the biomedical laboratory. Telemed J E Health, 2008; 14:801–807.
61.
Food and Drug Administration mobile guidance document. 2013. Available at www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/…/UCM263366.pdf (last accessed September12, 2014).
62.
LoweA, ChlipalaE, ElinJ, KawanoY, LongRE, TillmanD. Validation of digital pathology in a healthcare environment. White paper. Digital Pathology Association. 2011. Available at http://digitalpathologyassociation.org/_data/files/DPA-Healthcare-White-Paper-FINAL_v1.0.pdf (last accessed September12, 2014).
63.
LeungST, KaplanKJ. Medicolegal aspects of telepathology. Hum Pathol, 2009; 40:1137–1142.
64.
LongRE, SmithA, MachotkaSV, ChlipalaE, CannJ, KnightB, KawanoY, EllinJ, LoweA. Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee (SRPC) paper: Validation of digital pathology systems in the regulated nonclinical environment. Toxicol Pathol, 2013; 41:115–124.
