Introduction:Cloud-based videoconferencing versus traditional systems are described for possible use in telemedicine and distance learning.Materials and Methods:Differences between traditional and cloud-based videoconferencing systems are examined, and the methods for identifying and testing systems are explained. Findings are presented characterizing the cloud conferencing genre and its attributes versus traditional H.323 conferencing.Results:Because the technology is rapidly evolving and needs to be evaluated in reference to local needs, it is strongly recommended that this or other reviews not be considered substitutes for personal hands-on experience.Conclusions:This review identifies key attributes of the technology that can be used to appraise the relevance of cloud conferencing technology and to determine whether migration from traditional technology to a cloud environment is warranted. An evaluation template is provided for assessing systems appropriateness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MellP, GranceT. The NIST definition of cloud computing. Version 15.10.07. Gaithersburg, MD: Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2009.
2.
RodriguezP, CervifioJ, TrajkovskaI, SalvachuaJ. Advanced videoconferencing services based on webrtc. IADIS International Conferences Web Based Communities and Social Media 2012 and Collaborative Technologies. Prague, Czech Republic: IADIS, 2012; 180–184.
3.
EvansD. An introduction to unified communication: Challenges and opportunities. Aslib Proc New Inf Perspect, 2004; 56:308–314.
4.
RodriguezP, GallegoD, CervinoJ, EscribanoF, QuemadaJ, SalvachuaJ. Vaas: Videoconference as a service. 5th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing, 2009. CollaborateCom. Washington, DC: IEEE Xplore, 2009; 1–11.
5.
LiuW, ZhangK, LocatisC, AckermanM. Internet-based videoconferencing coder/decoders and tools for telemedicine. Telemed J E Health, 2011; 17:358–362.
6.
WiegandT, SullivanGJ, BjontegaardG, LuthraA. Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol, 2003; 13:560–576.
7.
HewageC, KarimH, WorrallS, DoganS, KondozA. Comparison of stereo video coding support in mpeg-4 mac, h.264/avc and h.264/svc. Proceedings of VIE2007. London: Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2007.
8.
HoJ, HuJ, SteenkisteP. A conference gateway supporting interoperability between SIP and H.323. Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Multimedia. New York: ACM, 2001; 421–430.
9.
MahoneyMV, ChanPK. Learning rules for anomaly detection of hostile network traffic. Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2003. ICDM 2003. New York: IEEE, 2003; 601–604.
