Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-03
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Electrolyzed Waters and Chlorine-Based Disinfectants: The Role of pH,Free Chlorine,and Oxidation–Reduction Potential Over Time
This study evaluated the antimicrobial efficacy of electrolyzed water (EW) and chlorine-based disinfectant (CLD) over time, focusing on the impact of pH, free chlorine (FCL), and oxidation–reduction potential (ORP). EW and CLD are commonly used for wound care and surgical instrument disinfection, but their chemical instability limits their use. The study was conducted in the Microbiology Laboratory of the University of Guanajuato, using Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 as the test organism. Disinfectants were maintained at 40°C, with systematic monitoring of pH, FCL, and ORP. Minimum bactericidal concentration was used to assess antimicrobial activity before and after thermal exposure. Statistical analyses included Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA, and the Friedman test. Results showed that the antimicrobial activity of EW depended on FCL concentration, with a significant correlation between the absence of FCL and increased minimum bactericidal concentration (p < 0.01). Disinfectants with alkaline pH demonstrated greater stability over time (p < 0.01). The findings highlight the importance of FCL, pH, and ORP in the effectiveness of these disinfectants and underscore their limitations due to chemical instability in clinical settings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MaillardJY, PascoeM. Disinfectants and antiseptics: Mechanisms of action and resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2024; 22(1):4–17; doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00958-3
2.
YanP, DaliriEBM, OhDH. New clinical applications of electrolyzed water: A review. Microorganisms, 2021; 9(1); doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010136
3.
AmpiawRE, YaqubM, LeeW. Electrolyzed water as a disinfectant: A systematic review of factors affecting the production and efficiency of hypochlorous acid. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2021; 43:102228; doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102228
4.
ChenBK, WangCK. Electrolyzed water and its pharmacological activities: A mini-review. Molecules, 2022; 27(4); doi: 10.3390/molecules27041222
5.
LiuQ, WuJ, LimZY, et al.Evaluation of the metabolic response of Escherichia coli to electrolysed water by 1H NMR spectroscopy. LWT, 2017; 79:428–436; doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.01.066
6.
TanakaH, HirakataY, KakuM, et al.Antimicrobial activity of superoxidized water. J Hosp Infect, 1996; 34(1):43–49; doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(96)90124-3
7.
Ortega-PeñaS, Hidalgo-GonzálezC, RobsonMC, et al.In vitro microbicidal, anti-biofilm and cytotoxic effects of different commercial antiseptics. Int Wound J, 2017; 14(3):470–479; doi: 10.1111/iwj.12625
8.
GallandatK, KolusRC, JulianTR, et al.A systematic review of chlorine-based surface disinfection efficacy to inform recommendations for low-resource outbreak settings. Am J Infect Control, 2021; 49(1):90–103; doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.05.014
9.
SlaughterRJ, WattsM, ValeJA, et al.The clinical toxicology of sodium hypochlorite. Clin Toxicol, 2019; 57(5):303–311; doi: 10.1080/15563650.2018.1543889
10.
Landa-SolisC, González-EspinosaD, Guzmán-SorianoB, et al.MicrocynTM: A novel super-oxidized water with neutral pH and disinfectant activity. Journal of Hospital Infection, 2005; 61(4):291–299; doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.04.021
11.
LenSV, HungYC, ChungD, et al.Effects of storage conditions and pH on chlorine loss in electrolyzed oxidizing (EO) water. J Agric Food Chem, 2002; 50(1):209–212; doi: 10.1021/jf010822v
12.
XuanXT, WangMM, AhnJ, et al.Storage stability of slightly acidic electrolyzed water and circulating electrolyzed water and their property changes after application. J Food Sci, 2016; 81(3):E610–E617; doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13230
13.
LeeHW, ParkB, YoonSR, et al.Physicochemical stability and virucidal effect of diluted, slightly acidic electrolyzed water against human norovirus. Food Sci Biotechnol, 2022; 31(1):131–138; doi: 10.1007/s10068-021-01011-w
14.
CuiX, ShangY, ShiZ, et al.Physicochemical properties and bactericidal efficiency of neutral and acidic electrolyzed water under different storage conditions. J Food Eng, 2009; 91(4):582–586; doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.10.006
15.
Perez-AyalaMS, AlvarezJA, MacIasAE, et al.How does time affect the antimicrobial activity of super-oxidized commercial antiseptic solutions? An In Vitro test. Microb Drug Resist, 2023; 29(7):309–315; doi: 10.1089/mdr.2022.0212
16.
BaerNS, FellerRL. Accelerated aging: Photochemical and thermal aspects. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 1996; 35(2):163; doi: 10.2307/3179994
MundimKC, BaraldiS, MachadoHG, et al.Temperature Coefficient (Q10) and its applications in biological systems: Beyond the Arrhenius theory. Ecol Modell, 2020:431; doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109127
19.
OficialN, NomM, AutorizadosT, et al.NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-073-SSA1-2015, Estabilidad de fármacos y medicamentos, así como remedios herbolarios. DOF Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2015.
20.
ZhuS, YangB, JiaY, et al.Comprehensive analysis of disinfectants on the horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes. J Hazard Mater, 2023; 453:131428; doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131428
21.
HouAM, YangD, MiaoJ, et al.Chlorine injury enhances antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa through over expression of drug efflux pumps. Water Res, 2019; 156:366–371; doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.035
22.
DangC, ZhangY, ZhengM, et al.Effect of chlorine disinfectant influx on biological sewage treatment process under the COVID-19 pandemic: Performance, mechanisms and implications. Water Res, 2023; 244:120453; doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120453
23.
NakaA, YakuboM, NakamuraK, et al.Effectiveness of slightly acidic electrolyzed water on bacteria reduction: In vitro and spray evaluation. PeerJ, 2020; 8(2):e8593; doi: 10.7717/peerj.8593
24.
GunaydinM, EsenS, KaradagA, et al.In vitro antimicrobial activity of Medilox® super-oxidized water. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 2014; 13(1):29; doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-13-29
25.
ZhangB, ZangY, MoQ, et al.Antibacterial activity and mechanism of slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW) combined with ultraviolet light against Staphylococcus aureus. Lwt, 2023; 182:114746; doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114746
26.
KimHJ, TangoCN, ChelliahR, et al.Sanitization Efficacy of Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water against pure cultures of Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, Typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus spores, in Comparison with Different Water Hardness. Sci Rep, 2019; 9(1):4348; doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40846-6
27.
Issa-ZachariaA. Application of slightly acidic electrolyzed water as a potential sanitizer in the food industry. J Food Qual, 2024; 2024:1–18; doi: 10.1155/2024/5559753
28.
YeZ, WangS, ChenT, et al.Inactivation mechanism of Escherichia coli induced by slightly acidic electrolyzed water. Sci Rep, 2017; 7(1):6279; doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06716-9
29.
ZhaoL, LiS, YangH. Recent advances on research of electrolyzed water and its applications. Curr Opin Food Sci, 2021; 41; doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2021.03.004
30.
LeBaronTW, SharpeR, OhnoK. Electrolyzed–Reduced water: Review I. molecular hydrogen is the exclusive agent responsible for the therapeutic effects. Int J Mol Sci, 2022; 23(23); doi: 10.3390/ijms232314750
31.
Cabrera-WroomanA, Ortega-PeñaS, SalgadoRM, et al.Antiseptic effects and biosafety of a controlled-flow electrolyzed acid solution involve electrochemical properties, rather than free radical presence. Microorganisms, 2022; 10(4); doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040745
32.
FadriquelaA, SajoMEJ, BajgaiJ, et al.Effects of strong acidic electrolyzed water in wound healing via inflammatory and oxidative stress response. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2020; 2020:2459826; doi: 10.1155/2020/2459826
33.
ReisR, SipahiH, DincO, et al.Toxicity, mutagenicity and stability assessment of simply produced electrolyzed water as a wound healing agent in vitro. Hum Exp Toxicol, 2021; 40(3):452–463; doi: 10.1177/0960327120952151
34.
GongoraK, VankerschaverJ, SampersI, et al.The influence of pH on the efficacy of oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) to predict chlorine disinfection of surrogate bacteria, Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes in oxidant demand free conditions and fresh produce wash water. Food Microbiol, 2024; 121:104516; doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2024.104516
35.
SeveringAL, RembeJD, KoesterV, et al.Safety and efficacy profiles of different commercial sodium hypochlorite/hypochlorous acid solutions (NaClO/HClO): Antimicrobial efficacy, cytotoxic impact and physicochemical parameters in vitro. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2019; 74(2):365–372; doi: 10.1093/jac/dky432
36.
OgunniyiAD, DandieCE, FerroS, et al.Comparative antibacterial activities of neutral electrolyzed oxidizing water and other chlorine-based sanitizers. Sci Rep, 2019; 9(1):19955; doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56248-7
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
