Abstract
Purpose:
Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is currently treated surgically. Reliable pharmaceutical options would be desirable, and numerous drugs have been proposed. This in vitro study is intended to systematically compare and determine the most promising candidates for the treatment of PVR.
Methods:
A structured literature review was conducted in the “PubMed” database to identify previously published agents proposed for medical treatment of PVR -36 substances that met the inclusion criteria. Toxicity and antiproliferative effects were evaluated on primary human retinal pigment epithelial (hRPE) using colorimetric viability assays. The seven substances with the widest therapeutic range between toxicity and no longer detectable antiproliferative effect were then validated with a bromodeoxyuridine assay and a scratch wound healing assay using primary cells derived from surgically excised human PVR membranes (hPVR).
Results:
Among 36 substances, 12 showed no effect on hRPE at all. Seventeen substances had a significant (P < 0.05) toxic effect of which nine did not have an antiproliferative effect. Fifteen substances significantly reduced hRPE proliferation (P < 0.05). The seven most promising drugs with the highest difference between toxicity and antiproliferative effects on hRPE were dasatinib, methotrexate, resveratrol, retinoic acid, simvastatin, tacrolimus, and tranilast. Whereof resveratrol, simvastatin, and tranilast additionally showed antiproliferative and dasatinib, resveratrol, and tranilast antimigratory effects on hPVR (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
This study presents a systematic comparison of drugs that have been proposed for PVR treatment in a human disease model. Dasatinib, resveratrol, simvastatin, and tranilast seem to be promising and are well-characterized in human use.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
