Abstract:Background:Mentha piperita (MP; peppermint) oil has many commercial uses.
Objective: To characterize the epidemiology of contact allergy to MP oil 2% petrolatum.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data (2009–2020).
Results: Of 28,128 patients tested to MP, 161 (0.6%) had an allergic reaction. Most allergic patients were female (77.0%) and/or over 40 years of age (71.4%). The most common anatomical sites of dermatitis included face (31.7%; of these, one-third specified lips), hands (17.4%), and scattered/generalized (18.6%). Nearly one-third (30.4%) of reactions were strong (++)/extreme (+++), and 80.1% were considered currently relevant. Common sources included oral hygiene preparations, foods, and lip products. Co-reaction with at least 1 of the other 19 fragrance/plant-related screening test preparations occurred in 82.6% (133/161) of MP-allergic patients, most commonly Cananga odorata oil (42.9%), fragrance mix I (41.0%), hydroperoxides of linalool (35.7%), Compositae mix (35.4%), Jasminum officinale oil (31.9%), Myroxylon pereirae (31.7%), and propolis (28.1%). Co-reaction with at least 1 of the 3 most commonly used fragrance screening allergens (fragrance mix I, fragrance mix II, and/or Myroxylon pereirae) was 59.6%.
Conclusions: Twelve-year prevalence of MP allergy was 0.6%. Approximately 40% of cases would have been missed if only fragrance screening allergens were tested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
de GrootA, SchmidtE. Essential oils, part V: Peppermint oil, lavender oil, and lemongrass oil. Dermatitis. 2016; 27(6):325–332; doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000218
2.
UterW, SchmidtE, GeierJ, et al.Contact allergy to essential oils: Current patch test results (2000–2008) from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK). Contact Dermatitis. 2010; 63(5):277–283; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01768.x
ThomsonKF, WilkinsonSM. Allergic contact dermatitis to plant extracts in patients with cosmetic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2000; 142(1):84–88; doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03245.x
12.
WöhrlS, HemmerW, FockeM, et al.The significance of fragrance mix, balsam of Peru, colophony and propolis as screening tools in the detection of fragrance allergy. Br J Dermatol. 2001; 145(2):268–273; doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04345.x
13.
GuinJD. Use of consumer product ingredients for patch testing. Dermatitis. 2005; 16(2):71–76.
14.
FettigJ, TaylorJ, SoodA. Post-surgical allergic contact dermatitis to compound tincture of benzoin and association with reactions to fragrances and essential oils. Dermatitis. 2014; 25(4):211–212; doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000057
15.
Dooms-GoossensA, DegreefH, HolvoetC, et al.Turpentine-induced hypersensitivity to peppermint oil. Contact Dermatitis. 1977; 3(6):304–308; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1977.tb03692.x
16.
WilkinsonSM, BeckMH. Allergic contact dermatitis from menthol in peppermint. Contact Dermatitis. 1994; 30(1):42–43; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1994.tb00728.x
17.
LewisFM, ShahM, GawkrodgerDJ. Contact sensitivity to food additives can cause oral and perioral symptoms. Contact Dermatitis. 1995; 33(6):429–430; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb02082.x
18.
MortonCA, GariochJ, ToddP, et al.Contact sensitivity to menthol and peppermint in patients with intra-oral symptoms. Contact Dermatitis. 1995; 32(5):281–284; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00781.x
19.
SelvaagE, HolmJO, ThuneP. Allergic contact dermatitis in an aroma therapist with multiple sensitizations to essential oils. Contact Dermatitis. 1995; 33(5):354–355; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb02058.x
20.
ShahM, LewisFM, GawkrodgerDJ. Contact allergy in patients with oral symptoms: A study of 47 patients. Am J Contact Dermat. 1996; 7(3):146–151.
21.
DownsAM, LearJT, SansomJE. Contact sensitivity in patients with oral symptoms. Contact Dermatitis. 1998; 39(5):258–259; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05921.x
22.
FlemingCJ, ForsythA. D5 patch test reactions to menthol and peppermint. Contact Dermatitis. 1998; 38(6):337; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05770.x
23.
FreemanS, StephensR. Cheilitis: Analysis of 75 cases referred to a contact dermatitis clinic. Am J Contact Dermat. 1999; 10(4):198–200; doi: 10.1053/AJCD01000198
24.
FrancalanciS, SertoliA, GiorginiS, et al.Multicentre study of allergic contact cheilitis from toothpastes. Contact Dermatitis. 2000; 43(4):216–222; doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.043004216.x
25.
FotiC, ConservaA, AntelmiA, et al.Contact dermatitis from peppermint and menthol in a local action transcutaneous patch. Contact Dermatitis. 2003; 49(6):312–313; doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.0251i.x
26.
KalavalaM, HughesTM, GoodwinRG, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis to peppermint foot spray. Contact Dermatitis. 2007; 57(1):57–58; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01078.x
27.
VermaatH, SmienkF, RustemeyerT, et al.Anogenital allergic contact dermatitis, the role of spices and flavour allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 2008; 59(4):233–237; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01417.x
28.
TranA, PrattM, DeKovenJ. Acute allergic contact dermatitis of the lips from peppermint oil in a lip balm. Dermatitis. 2010; 21(2):111–115.
29.
NardelliA, DriegheJ, ClaesL, et al.Fragrance allergens in ‘specific’ cosmetic products. Contact Dermatitis. 2011; 64(4):212–219; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01877.x
30.
TravassosAR, ClaesL, BoeyL, et al.Non-fragrance allergens in specific cosmetic products. Contact Dermatitis. 2011; 65(5):276–285; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01968.x
31.
BourgeoisP, GoossensA. Allergic contact cheilitis caused by menthol in toothpaste and throat medication: A case report. Contact Dermatitis. 2016; 75(2):113–115; doi: 10.1111/cod.12571
GriggsJ, AlmohannaH, AhmedA, et al.“Fresh Breath” on toothpaste: Peppermint as cause of cheilitis. Dermatitis. 2019; 30(1):74–75; doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000433
HjorthN, JervoeP. Allergisk kontaktstomatitis og kontaktdermatis fremkaldt af smagsstoffer i tandpasta [Allergic contact stomatitis and dermatitis from flavour of toothpaste]. Tandlaegebladet. 1967; 71(10):937–942.
38.
ParysBT. Chemical burns resulting from contact with peppermint oil mar: A case report. Burns Incl Therm Inj. 1983; 9(5):374–375; doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(83)90087-6
SantucciB, CristaudoA, CannistraciC, et al.Contact dermatitis to fragrances. Contact Dermatitis. 1987; 16(2):93–95; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1987.tb01386.x
41.
PaulsenE, AndersenKE. Colophonium and Compositae mix as markers of fragrance allergy: Cross-reactivity between fragrance terpenes, colophonium and compositae plant extracts. Contact Dermatitis. 2005; 53(5):285–291; doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00704.x
42.
WetterDA, YianniasJA, PrakashAV, et al.Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: An analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010; 63(5):789–798; doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.11.033
43.
DeKovenJG, SilverbergJI, WarshawEM, et al.North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2017-2018. Dermatitis. 2021; 32(2):111–123; doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000729
44.
UterW, SchwitullaJ, ThyssenJP, et al.The ‘overall yield’ with the baseline series - a useful addition to the array of MOAHLFA factors describing departmental characteristics of patch tested patients. Contact Dermatitis. 2011; 65(6):322–328; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01964.x
Jackson-DavisA, WhiteS, KassamaLS, et al.A review of regulatory standards and advances in essential oils as antimicrobials in foods. J Food Prot. 2023; 86(2):100025; doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2022.100025
de GrootAC, SchmidtE. Essential oils, part IV: Contact allergy. Dermatitis. 2016; 27(4):170–175; doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000197
49.
LepoittevinJP. Metabolism versus chemical transformation or pro- versus prehaptens? Contact Dermatitis. 2006; 54(2):73–74; doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00795.x
50.
SabroeRA, HoldenCR, GawkrodgerDJ. Contact allergy to essential oils cannot always be predicted from allergy to fragrance markers in the baseline series. Contact Dermatitis. 2016; 74(4):236–241; doi: 10.1111/cod.12528
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
