EFSA, EscherSE, PartoschF, et al. Development of a roadmap for action on new approach methodologies in risk assessment. EFSA supporting publication, 2022. doi: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2022.EN-7341. Available from: https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/sp.efsa.2022.EN-7341. Accessed September12, 2022.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. Guidance for industry and test method developers: CPSC staff evaluation of alternative test methods and integrated testing approaches and data generated from such methods to support FHSA labeling requirements. Bethesda, MD. 2022. Available from: https://www.regulations.gov/document/CPSC-2021-0006-0002. Accessed September12, 2022.
8.
EskesC. The usefulness of integrated strategy approaches in replacing animal experimentation. Ann Ist Super Sanita, 2019; 55(4):400–404; doi: 10.4415/ANN_19_04_16. PMID: 31850870.
9.
BrackenMB Why animal studies are often poor predictors of human reactions to exposure. J R Soc Med, 2009; 102(3):120–122; doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2008.08k033.
10.
LeistM, HartungT. Inflammatory findings on species extrapolations: Humans are definitely no 70-kg mice. Arch Toxicol, 2013; 87(4):563–567; doi: org/10.1007/s00204-013-1038-0.
11.
CohenSM. The relevance of experimental carcinogenicity studies to human safety. Curr Opin Toxicol, 2017; 3:6–11; doi; 10.1016/j.cotox.2017.04.002.
12.
LeenaarsCHC, KouwenaarC, StafleuFR, et al. Animal to human translation: A systematic scoping review of reported concordance rates. J Transl Med, 2019; 17(1):223; doi; 10.1186/s12967-019-1976-2.
13.
Ritskes-HoitingaM, BarellaY, Kleinhout-VliekT. The promises of speeding up: Changes in requirements for animal studies and alternatives during COVID-19 vaccine approval—A case study. Animals (Basel), 2022; 12(13):1735; doi: 10.3390/ani12131735.
14.
ClerbauxLA, AmigóN, AmorimMJ, et al. COVID-19 through adverse outcome pathways: Building networks to better understand the disease—3rd CIAO AOP Design Workshop. ALTEX, 2022; 39(2):322–335; doi: 10.14573/altex.2112161.
15.
van der ZalmAJ, BarrosoJ, BrowneP, et al. A framework for establishing scientific confidence in new approach methodologies. Arch Toxicol 2022; doi: 10.1007/s00204-022-03365-4 Available from: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00204-022-03365-4.pdf. Accessed on 12 September 2022.
16.
UlreyA, KolleS, LandsiedelR, et al. How a GIVIMP certification program can increase confidence in in vitro methods. ALTEX, 2021; 38(2):316–318; doi: 10.14573/altex.2102261.