OECD. Guidance Document for the Conduct of Skin Absorption Studies. Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 28. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2004.
2.
Schäefer-KortingM, BockU, DiembeckW, et al.The use of reconstructed human epidermis for skin absorption testing: Results of the validation study. ATLA, 2008:36; 161–187.
3.
EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues. Guidance on dermal absorption. EFSA J, 2012:10; 2665.
4.
OECD. Guidance Notes on Interpreting Dermal Absorption. Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 156. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2011.
5.
StoickK, NitschkeK, SanduskyC. Systemic testing by the dermal route can be precluded by new non-animal percutaneous absorption strategies. AATEX, 2007:14; 561–564.
6.
BouwmanT, CroninMT, BessemsJG, et al.Improving the applicability of (Q)SARs for percutaneous penetration in regulatory risk assessment. Hum Exp Toxicol, 2008:27; 269–276.
7.
FasanoWJ, ten BergeWF, BantonMI, et al.Dermal penetration of propylene glycols: Measured absorption across human abdominal skin in vitro and comparison with a QSAR model. Toxicol In Vitro, 2011:25; 1664–1670.
8.
XuG, Hughes-OliverJM, BrooksJD, et al.Predicting skin permeability from complex chemical mixtures: Incorporation of an expanded QSAR model. SAR QSAR Environ Res, 2013:24; 711–731.
