Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper is based on the results of a random sample survey of the adult population of Britain. The survey was designed to explore public interest in, attitudes towards and understanding of science. The paper operationalizes the notion of scientific understanding, and applies the understanding measure in the analysis of social representations of science. The results suggest: first, that a so-called `deficit model' of public understanding of science is useful for certain well-defined analytical purposes; second, that there are significant differences between professional and popular representations of science, and third, that medical science may be paradigmatic for the popular representation of science in Britain.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boy, D., 1987, Today's myth of science: how sciences are perceived, categorized, and evaluated by contemporary society (unpublished work).

National Science Board , 1988, Science and Engineering Indicators—1987 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office).

Evans, G. A. , and Durant, J. R. , Understanding of science in Britain and the USA. British Social Attitudes: Special International Report, edited by R. Jowell et al. (Aldershot: Gower Publishing), pp. 105-119.

Ziman, J. , 1991, Public understanding of science. Science, Technology & Human Values, 16(1), 99-105.

Wynne, B. , 1992, Public understanding of science research: new horizons or hall of mirrors? Public Understanding of Science, 1, 37-43.

Wynne, B. , 1991, After Chernobyl: science made too simple? New Scientist, 26 January, 44-46.

Lévy-Leblond, J.-M. , 1992, About misunderstandings about misunderstandings. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 17-21.

Fayard, P. , 1992, Let's stop persecuting people who don't think like Galileo! Public Understanding of Science, 1, 15-16.

See Durant, J. R. , 1990, Copernicus and Conan Doyle. Or, why should we care about the public understanding of science? Science and Public Affairs, 5(1), 7-22.

10.

Gould, S. J. , 1981, The Mismeasure of Man (New York, London: W. W. Norton), pp. 146-158.

11.

Wynne, B. , 1991, Knowledges in context. Science, Technology & Human Values, 16, 111-121.

12.

Hazen, R. , and Trefil, J. , 1990, Science Matters. Achieving Scientific Literacy (New York: Doubleday).

13.

Miller, J. D. , 1983, Scientific literacy: a conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112, 29-48.

14.

Nunnally, J. C. , 1978, Psychometric Theory (New York: McGraw-Hill).

15.

Boy, D. , 1987, Today's myth of science: how sciences are perceived, categorized, and evaluated by contemporary society (unpublished work).

16.

Moscovici, S. , 1984, The phenomenon of social representations. Social Representations, edited by R. Farr and S. Moscovici (Cambridge University Press), pp. 3-69.

Public understanding of science in Britain: the role of medicine in the popular representation of science

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References