Grade models built by traditional estimation or simulation methods often fail to reproduce the complex relationships between the variables. This work investigates the use of the multivariate transformation called Projection Pursuit Multivariate Transform (PPMT), which fully decorrelates the multiple variables of interest, allowing the independent conditional simulation of each variable in the transformed space. Finally, the simulated variables are back-transformed, reproducing the initial correlations of the data. The PPMT workflow was applied to a nickel laterite deposit considering five variables: nickel, iron, silica, magnesium, and calcium grades. Conditional simulations of each variable were run and validated. The back-transformed realisations reproduced the multivariate relationships of the data. To calculate the uncertainties, mining panels equivalent to two and four weeks of production were generated using the k-means clustering technique. Uncertainties were summarised by the coefficient of variation (CV) and the results were used to define classes of mineral resources.
AbzalovMZ, BowerJ.2014. Geology of bauxite deposits and their resource estimation practices.Appl Earth Sci. 123(2):118–134.
2.
BarnettRM.2015. Managing complex multivariate relations in the presence of incomplete spatial data. [Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy in Mining Engineering)]. Edmonton: University of Alberta.
BassaniMAA, Coimbra Leite CostaJF, DeutschCV.2018. Multivariate geostatistical simulation with sum and fraction constraints.Appl Earth Sci. 127(3):83–93.
8.
BattalgazyN, MadaniN.2019. Categorization of mineral resources based on different geostatistical simulation algorithms: a case study from an iron Ore deposit.Nat Resour Res. 28(4):1329–1351.
9.
DesbaratsAJ, DimitrakopoulosR.2000. Geostatistical simulation of regionalized pore-size distributions using min/max autocorrelation factors.Math Geol. 32(8):919–942.
10.
de SouzaLE, CostaJFCL, KoppeJC.2010. Comparative analysis of the resource classification techniques: case study of the conceição mine, Brazil.Appl Earth Sci. 119:166–175.
11.
DeutschCV, JournelAG.1998. GSLIB: geostatistical software library and user's guide. New York: Oxford University PressSage UK: London, England.
12.
DohmC.2004. Quantifiable mineral resource classification: A logical approach. In: LeuangthongO., DeutschC.V, editor. Geostatistics, banff. quantitative geology and geostatistics, v. 14. Dordrecht: SpringerSage UK: London, England; p. 333–342, 2005.
13.
FriedmanJH.1987. Exploratory projection pursuit.J Am Stat Assoc. 82(397):249–266.
14.
HwangJ, LayS, LippmanA.1994. Nonparametric multivariate density estimation: a comparative study.IEEE Trans Signal Process. 42(10):2795–2810.
15.
IsaaksEH.1990. The application of monte carlo methods to the analysis of spatially correlated data [Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy)]. Department of Applied Earth Sciences. Stanford University, Stanford.
16.
IsaaksEH, SrivastavaMR.1989. An Introduction to applied geostatistics. New York: Oxford University PressSage UK: London, England.
LeuangthongO, DeutschCV.2003. Stepwise conditional transformation for simulation of multiple variables.Math Geol. 35(2):155–173.
19.
LittleRJA, RubinDB.2002. Statistical analysis with missing data, 2nd ed. New York: WileySage UK: London, England.
20.
MacqueenJ.1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Le CamL.M., NeymanJ., editor. Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on Mathematical statistics and probabilities, v. 1. Berkeley: University of California PressSage UK: London, England; p. 281–297.
21.
MarciszM.2013. Practical application of coefficient of variation. In: SánchezA., KrzemieñA., FernándezP.R., RodríguezF.J.I., editor. Proceedings of the 13th international congress on energy and mineral resources (CIERM 2013). Santander: National Association of Spanish Mining EngineersSage UK: London, England; p. 202–208.
22.
MatheronG.1963. Principles of geostatistics.Econ Geol. 58(8):1246–1266.
23.
MeryN, EmeryX, CáceresA, RibeiroD, CunhaE.2017. Geostatistical modeling of the geological uncertainty in an iron ore deposit.Ore Geol Rev. 88:336–351.
24.
OwusuS, DagdelenK.2019. Critical Review of mineral resource classification techniques in the gold mining industry.Insights Min Sci Technology. 1(3):74–79.
25.
PearsonK.1901. On lines and planes of closest Fit to systems of points in space.Philos Mag. 6(2:11):559–572.
26.
SaldanhaAA.2020. Definição de estratégia de Sondagem para aumento na conversão de recursos e reservas [Master Dissertation (Master in Engineering)]. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Minas, Metalúrgica e de Materiais. Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
27.
SilvaCJE.2020. Influência do espaçamento da malha de Sondagem na incerteza do Recurso mineral [Master Dissertation (Master in Engineering)]. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of Alberta, Edmonton.
28.
SilvaDSF.2015. Mineral resource classification and drill hole optimization using novel geostatistical algorithms with a comparison to traditional techniques [Thesis (Master of Science in Mining Engineering)]. Edmonton: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of Alberta.
29.
SwitzerP, GreenA.1984. Min/max autocorrelation factors for multivariate spatial imagery. Technical Report No 6. Stanford: Department of Statistics, Stanford University.
